布兰德和奥特曼分析:机器性能检查输出

Aime M. Gloi, Vladimir Stankovich, Benjamin Rodriguez, Stanley Mayas
{"title":"布兰德和奥特曼分析:机器性能检查输出","authors":"Aime M. Gloi, Vladimir Stankovich, Benjamin Rodriguez, Stanley Mayas","doi":"10.53430/ijsru.2023.5.2.0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the variation in the daily output of a linac Varian Edge TrueBeam over a month, using a Daily QA3 (QA3) and machine performance check (MPC), after Task Group 51protocol and baseline data had been established. Methods and Materials: The daily output data were collected for all photons (6, 10 MV, and 6, 10 FFF) and electrons (6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV) energies. A Bland-Altman-Plot and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess agreement and reliability. Results: MPC data showed small random deviations of ≤ 2% and agreed with the QA3 measurements. The maximum mean absolute difference between the QA3 and MPC data was observed with 6 MeV (0.5633), with limits of agreement of (−0.5392–1.6658). Conclusion: These results suggest that MPC data closely track QA3 data and that the two forms are interchangeable","PeriodicalId":394579,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Scientific Research Updates","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bland and Altman analysis: Machine performance check output\",\"authors\":\"Aime M. Gloi, Vladimir Stankovich, Benjamin Rodriguez, Stanley Mayas\",\"doi\":\"10.53430/ijsru.2023.5.2.0046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the variation in the daily output of a linac Varian Edge TrueBeam over a month, using a Daily QA3 (QA3) and machine performance check (MPC), after Task Group 51protocol and baseline data had been established. Methods and Materials: The daily output data were collected for all photons (6, 10 MV, and 6, 10 FFF) and electrons (6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV) energies. A Bland-Altman-Plot and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess agreement and reliability. Results: MPC data showed small random deviations of ≤ 2% and agreed with the QA3 measurements. The maximum mean absolute difference between the QA3 and MPC data was observed with 6 MeV (0.5633), with limits of agreement of (−0.5392–1.6658). Conclusion: These results suggest that MPC data closely track QA3 data and that the two forms are interchangeable\",\"PeriodicalId\":394579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Scientific Research Updates\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Scientific Research Updates\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53430/ijsru.2023.5.2.0046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Scientific Research Updates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53430/ijsru.2023.5.2.0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是在任务组51协议和基线数据建立后,使用每日QA3 (QA3)和机器性能检查(MPC)评估直线瓦里安边缘TrueBeam一个月的日产量变化。方法和材料:收集所有光子(6,10 MV和6,10 FFF)和电子(6,9,12和15 MeV)能量的每日输出数据。使用Bland-Altman-Plot和类内相关系数来评估一致性和可靠性。结果:MPC数据随机偏差较小,≤2%,与QA3测量值一致。QA3和MPC数据的最大平均绝对差值为6 MeV(0.5633),一致性限为(- 0.5392-1.6658)。结论:这些结果表明MPC数据与QA3数据密切相关,两种形式是可互换的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bland and Altman analysis: Machine performance check output
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the variation in the daily output of a linac Varian Edge TrueBeam over a month, using a Daily QA3 (QA3) and machine performance check (MPC), after Task Group 51protocol and baseline data had been established. Methods and Materials: The daily output data were collected for all photons (6, 10 MV, and 6, 10 FFF) and electrons (6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV) energies. A Bland-Altman-Plot and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess agreement and reliability. Results: MPC data showed small random deviations of ≤ 2% and agreed with the QA3 measurements. The maximum mean absolute difference between the QA3 and MPC data was observed with 6 MeV (0.5633), with limits of agreement of (−0.5392–1.6658). Conclusion: These results suggest that MPC data closely track QA3 data and that the two forms are interchangeable
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信