团体希望训练与神经语言规划(NLP)对癌症儿童希望和生活质量的影响比较

S. Aghakhani, F. Bahari
{"title":"团体希望训练与神经语言规划(NLP)对癌症儿童希望和生活质量的影响比较","authors":"S. Aghakhani, F. Bahari","doi":"10.18502/bccr.v13i3.11400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of group hope training and neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) on hope and quality of life among children with cancer. \nMethods: This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of group hopefulness and group training of psycho-neurological programming (NLP) on the level of hope and quality of life of children with cancer. This was a quasi-experimental study with pre-test, post-test, and follow-up with a control group. The study participants include all literate 7-18-year-old girls and boys with cancer treated at Amirkabir Hospital (Central Province Children’s Cancer Hospital) and Tabassum Cancer Association (Central Province Cancer Association) in 2016. In total, 60 people were selected by the available sampling method and randomly divided into three groups: group hope training (20 people), NLP (20 people), and a control group without any therapeutic intervention (20 people). The Children’s Quality of Life Questionnaire and the Snyder Children’s Hope Scale were used. Multivariate and one-way analyses of covariance were applied to analyze the data. \nResults: There was a significant difference between group hope training and the NLP group. Both interventions had almost the same effect on the quality of life, while group hope training had a higher effect on dependent variables. Results showed that LNP group training led to increased quality of life and hope, predicting 70% and 40% of their variances. In addition, findings showed the effectiveness of group hope training on increased quality of life and hope and could predict 53% and 84% of their variances, respectively. The findings showed that NLP training and group hope training increased quality of life and hope. \nConclusion: According to the findings from this study, LNP group training and hope group training can increase the quality of life and hope. Based on the findings of the present study and the results of previous studies, it can be concluded that group hope and group training of neuro-linguistic programming, based on their basic principles and techniques and changing beliefs and attitudes of individuals and hope for learning, helps children with cancer change the way they react to these events, thus reduce their stress and frustration, and set specific goals for the future that inspires them. These studies show that these psychological interventions lead to positive changes and increase hope and quality of life of children with cancer.","PeriodicalId":280576,"journal":{"name":"Basic & Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Between the Effectiveness of Group Hope Training and Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) on Hope and Quality of Life among Children with Cancer\",\"authors\":\"S. Aghakhani, F. Bahari\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/bccr.v13i3.11400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of group hope training and neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) on hope and quality of life among children with cancer. \\nMethods: This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of group hopefulness and group training of psycho-neurological programming (NLP) on the level of hope and quality of life of children with cancer. This was a quasi-experimental study with pre-test, post-test, and follow-up with a control group. The study participants include all literate 7-18-year-old girls and boys with cancer treated at Amirkabir Hospital (Central Province Children’s Cancer Hospital) and Tabassum Cancer Association (Central Province Cancer Association) in 2016. In total, 60 people were selected by the available sampling method and randomly divided into three groups: group hope training (20 people), NLP (20 people), and a control group without any therapeutic intervention (20 people). The Children’s Quality of Life Questionnaire and the Snyder Children’s Hope Scale were used. Multivariate and one-way analyses of covariance were applied to analyze the data. \\nResults: There was a significant difference between group hope training and the NLP group. Both interventions had almost the same effect on the quality of life, while group hope training had a higher effect on dependent variables. Results showed that LNP group training led to increased quality of life and hope, predicting 70% and 40% of their variances. In addition, findings showed the effectiveness of group hope training on increased quality of life and hope and could predict 53% and 84% of their variances, respectively. The findings showed that NLP training and group hope training increased quality of life and hope. \\nConclusion: According to the findings from this study, LNP group training and hope group training can increase the quality of life and hope. Based on the findings of the present study and the results of previous studies, it can be concluded that group hope and group training of neuro-linguistic programming, based on their basic principles and techniques and changing beliefs and attitudes of individuals and hope for learning, helps children with cancer change the way they react to these events, thus reduce their stress and frustration, and set specific goals for the future that inspires them. These studies show that these psychological interventions lead to positive changes and increase hope and quality of life of children with cancer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":280576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Basic & Clinical Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Basic & Clinical Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/bccr.v13i3.11400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic & Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/bccr.v13i3.11400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在探讨团体希望训练和神经语言规划(NLP)对癌症儿童希望和生活质量的影响。方法:本研究旨在探讨群体希望和群体心理神经规划(NLP)训练对癌症患儿希望水平和生活质量的影响。这是一项准实验研究,包括前测、后测和对照组随访。研究参与者包括2016年在Amirkabir医院(中部省儿童癌症医院)和Tabassum癌症协会(中部省癌症协会)接受过癌症治疗的所有识字的7-18岁男孩和女孩。采用现有的抽样方法,共选取60人,随机分为希望训练组(20人)、NLP组(20人)和不进行任何治疗干预的对照组(20人)。采用儿童生活质量问卷和施耐德儿童希望量表。采用多变量和单向协方差分析对数据进行分析。结果:希望训练组与NLP组之间存在显著性差异。两种干预对生活质量的影响几乎相同,而团体希望训练对因变量的影响更高。结果显示,LNP组训练提高了生活质量和希望,预测了70%和40%的方差。此外,研究结果显示,团体希望训练对提高生活质量和希望的有效性,可以分别预测53%和84%的方差。研究结果表明,NLP训练和团体希望训练提高了生活质量和希望。结论:根据本研究的发现,LNP组训练和希望组训练可以提高生活质量和希望。结合本研究的发现和以往的研究结果,可以得出结论,神经语言编程的小组希望和小组训练,基于其基本原理和技术,改变个人的信念和态度以及学习的希望,可以帮助癌症儿童改变他们对这些事件的反应方式,从而减少他们的压力和挫折,并为未来设定具体的目标,激励他们。这些研究表明,这些心理干预带来了积极的变化,增加了癌症儿童的希望和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison Between the Effectiveness of Group Hope Training and Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) on Hope and Quality of Life among Children with Cancer
Background: This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of group hope training and neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) on hope and quality of life among children with cancer. Methods: This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of group hopefulness and group training of psycho-neurological programming (NLP) on the level of hope and quality of life of children with cancer. This was a quasi-experimental study with pre-test, post-test, and follow-up with a control group. The study participants include all literate 7-18-year-old girls and boys with cancer treated at Amirkabir Hospital (Central Province Children’s Cancer Hospital) and Tabassum Cancer Association (Central Province Cancer Association) in 2016. In total, 60 people were selected by the available sampling method and randomly divided into three groups: group hope training (20 people), NLP (20 people), and a control group without any therapeutic intervention (20 people). The Children’s Quality of Life Questionnaire and the Snyder Children’s Hope Scale were used. Multivariate and one-way analyses of covariance were applied to analyze the data. Results: There was a significant difference between group hope training and the NLP group. Both interventions had almost the same effect on the quality of life, while group hope training had a higher effect on dependent variables. Results showed that LNP group training led to increased quality of life and hope, predicting 70% and 40% of their variances. In addition, findings showed the effectiveness of group hope training on increased quality of life and hope and could predict 53% and 84% of their variances, respectively. The findings showed that NLP training and group hope training increased quality of life and hope. Conclusion: According to the findings from this study, LNP group training and hope group training can increase the quality of life and hope. Based on the findings of the present study and the results of previous studies, it can be concluded that group hope and group training of neuro-linguistic programming, based on their basic principles and techniques and changing beliefs and attitudes of individuals and hope for learning, helps children with cancer change the way they react to these events, thus reduce their stress and frustration, and set specific goals for the future that inspires them. These studies show that these psychological interventions lead to positive changes and increase hope and quality of life of children with cancer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信