帕金森数据中不同特征选择方法的比较分析

Edjola Naka, V. Guliashki, G. Marinova
{"title":"帕金森数据中不同特征选择方法的比较分析","authors":"Edjola Naka, V. Guliashki, G. Marinova","doi":"10.1109/TELSIKS52058.2021.9606398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a comparative analysis of different feature selection methods in a voice Parkinson dataset in order to find an optimal subset with relevant features which gives the higher accuracy. Filter and wrapper methods, and Genetic algorithm are considered for selecting the features. The performance of each feature selection method is evaluated through the accuracy of three popular supervised learning algorithms. Generalized Simulated Annealing (GSA) in used in improving the accuracy of the hyper-parameters of the classifiers. In conclusion, comparisons between the above mentioned methods are presented and the effect that has GSA in the accuracy for each subset.","PeriodicalId":228464,"journal":{"name":"2021 15th International Conference on Advanced Technologies, Systems and Services in Telecommunications (TELSIKS)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of Different Feature Selection Methods on a Parkinson Data\",\"authors\":\"Edjola Naka, V. Guliashki, G. Marinova\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TELSIKS52058.2021.9606398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides a comparative analysis of different feature selection methods in a voice Parkinson dataset in order to find an optimal subset with relevant features which gives the higher accuracy. Filter and wrapper methods, and Genetic algorithm are considered for selecting the features. The performance of each feature selection method is evaluated through the accuracy of three popular supervised learning algorithms. Generalized Simulated Annealing (GSA) in used in improving the accuracy of the hyper-parameters of the classifiers. In conclusion, comparisons between the above mentioned methods are presented and the effect that has GSA in the accuracy for each subset.\",\"PeriodicalId\":228464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 15th International Conference on Advanced Technologies, Systems and Services in Telecommunications (TELSIKS)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 15th International Conference on Advanced Technologies, Systems and Services in Telecommunications (TELSIKS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TELSIKS52058.2021.9606398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 15th International Conference on Advanced Technologies, Systems and Services in Telecommunications (TELSIKS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TELSIKS52058.2021.9606398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文对语音帕金森数据集的不同特征选择方法进行了对比分析,以期找到具有相关特征的最优子集,从而获得更高的准确率。采用过滤和包装方法以及遗传算法对特征进行选择。通过三种流行的监督学习算法的准确性来评估每种特征选择方法的性能。将广义模拟退火(GSA)用于提高分类器超参数的准确率。最后,对上述方法进行了比较,并分析了GSA对每个子集精度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Analysis of Different Feature Selection Methods on a Parkinson Data
This paper provides a comparative analysis of different feature selection methods in a voice Parkinson dataset in order to find an optimal subset with relevant features which gives the higher accuracy. Filter and wrapper methods, and Genetic algorithm are considered for selecting the features. The performance of each feature selection method is evaluated through the accuracy of three popular supervised learning algorithms. Generalized Simulated Annealing (GSA) in used in improving the accuracy of the hyper-parameters of the classifiers. In conclusion, comparisons between the above mentioned methods are presented and the effect that has GSA in the accuracy for each subset.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信