I. Shinko, Tetsuya Oda, Evjola Spaho, Vladi Koliçi, Makoto Ikeda, L. Barolli
{"title":"基于ONE和SUMO模拟器的仿真系统:首次接触、预测和喷雾等待DTN协议的性能评估","authors":"I. Shinko, Tetsuya Oda, Evjola Spaho, Vladi Koliçi, Makoto Ikeda, L. Barolli","doi":"10.1109/BWCCA.2015.60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we investigate the performance of First Contact, Prophet and Spray-and-Wait protocols in a Vehicular Delay Tolerant Network (VDTN) crossroad scenario. The mobility patterns of vehicles are generated by means of SUMO (Simulation of Urban MObility) and as communication protocol simulator is used ONE (Opportunistic Network Environment). For the simulations, we used IEEE 802.11p standard and TwoRayGround Propagation Loss Model. We use Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), Relay Delivery Ratio (RDR), hop count and delay as evaluation metrics. We compared the performance of three protocols and the simulation results show that for PDR the Prophet protocol has better performance than other protocols. Considering RDR, the performance of First Contact and Spray-and-Wait protocols is better than Prophet protocol. For hop count, the performance of Spray-and-Wait protocol is better than other protocols. While for delay, the performance of Prophet protocol is better than other protocols.","PeriodicalId":193597,"journal":{"name":"2015 10th International Conference on Broadband and Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications (BWCCA)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Simulation System Based on ONE and SUMO Simulators: Performance Evaluation of First Contact, Prophet and Spray-and-Wait DTN Protocols\",\"authors\":\"I. Shinko, Tetsuya Oda, Evjola Spaho, Vladi Koliçi, Makoto Ikeda, L. Barolli\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BWCCA.2015.60\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we investigate the performance of First Contact, Prophet and Spray-and-Wait protocols in a Vehicular Delay Tolerant Network (VDTN) crossroad scenario. The mobility patterns of vehicles are generated by means of SUMO (Simulation of Urban MObility) and as communication protocol simulator is used ONE (Opportunistic Network Environment). For the simulations, we used IEEE 802.11p standard and TwoRayGround Propagation Loss Model. We use Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), Relay Delivery Ratio (RDR), hop count and delay as evaluation metrics. We compared the performance of three protocols and the simulation results show that for PDR the Prophet protocol has better performance than other protocols. Considering RDR, the performance of First Contact and Spray-and-Wait protocols is better than Prophet protocol. For hop count, the performance of Spray-and-Wait protocol is better than other protocols. While for delay, the performance of Prophet protocol is better than other protocols.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 10th International Conference on Broadband and Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications (BWCCA)\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 10th International Conference on Broadband and Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications (BWCCA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BWCCA.2015.60\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 10th International Conference on Broadband and Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications (BWCCA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BWCCA.2015.60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
本文研究了车辆容忍延迟网络(VDTN)十字路口场景下的首次接触协议、先知协议和喷雾等待协议的性能。车辆的移动模式是通过SUMO (Simulation of Urban mobility)和ONE (Opportunistic Network Environment)作为通信协议模拟器生成的。仿真采用IEEE 802.11p标准和TwoRayGround传播损耗模型。我们使用分组传输比(PDR)、中继传输比(RDR)、跳数和延迟作为评估指标。对比了三种协议的性能,仿真结果表明,对于PDR, Prophet协议的性能优于其他协议。考虑RDR,第一次接触协议和喷雾等待协议的性能优于先知协议。对于跳数,Spray-and-Wait协议的性能优于其他协议。而在延迟方面,Prophet协议的性能优于其他协议。
A Simulation System Based on ONE and SUMO Simulators: Performance Evaluation of First Contact, Prophet and Spray-and-Wait DTN Protocols
In this paper, we investigate the performance of First Contact, Prophet and Spray-and-Wait protocols in a Vehicular Delay Tolerant Network (VDTN) crossroad scenario. The mobility patterns of vehicles are generated by means of SUMO (Simulation of Urban MObility) and as communication protocol simulator is used ONE (Opportunistic Network Environment). For the simulations, we used IEEE 802.11p standard and TwoRayGround Propagation Loss Model. We use Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), Relay Delivery Ratio (RDR), hop count and delay as evaluation metrics. We compared the performance of three protocols and the simulation results show that for PDR the Prophet protocol has better performance than other protocols. Considering RDR, the performance of First Contact and Spray-and-Wait protocols is better than Prophet protocol. For hop count, the performance of Spray-and-Wait protocol is better than other protocols. While for delay, the performance of Prophet protocol is better than other protocols.