基于选择性小区丢弃的TCP/IP最大努力流量适应VBR业务类别广域网ATM的研究

S. Ano, T. Hasegawa, T. Kato
{"title":"基于选择性小区丢弃的TCP/IP最大努力流量适应VBR业务类别广域网ATM的研究","authors":"S. Ano, T. Hasegawa, T. Kato","doi":"10.1109/ATM.1999.786907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is important to establish the technology to accommodate best-effort TCP/IP traffic over wide area ATM networks. The UBR (unspecified bit rate) service category is the most typical service category for the best-effort traffic, especially in the LAN environment. On the other hand, the VBR (variable bit rate) service category with SCD (selective cell discard) option is considered as the service category which is appropriate for wide area networks due to its fairness and minimum guarantee of the cell transmission using not only PCR (peak cell rate) but SCR (sustainable cell rate) and MBS (maximum burst size). However, there is no actual evaluation for such service. We have, therefore, performed the experimental studies on TCP/IP over VBR with SCD service along with UBR and VBR without SCD cases. Through these experiments, we measured the link utilization of the effective data and the fairness between each obtained TCP/IP throughput during congestion of the ATM switch. From the results of the link utilization, the value is always over 90% under the various conditions. Therefore, even in the case of cell losses due to SCD or buffer overflow in ATM switch congestion, the average throughput is almost the same as the value which equals the trunk line speed divided by the number of the accommodated TCP/IP connections. From the results of the fairness, VBR with SCD has almost the same characteristics as UBR and obtains better TCP/IP throughput than VBR without SCD. Finally, we discuss the effectiveness of VBR with SCD and the other service categories, such as UBR and ABR (available bit rate), and conclude that VBR with SCD is one of the most suitable ATM service categories for wide area ATM networks.","PeriodicalId":266412,"journal":{"name":"IEEE ATM Workshop '99 Proceedings (Cat. No. 99TH8462)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study on accommodation of TCP/IP best-effort traffic to wide area ATM network with VBR service category using selective cell discard\",\"authors\":\"S. Ano, T. Hasegawa, T. Kato\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ATM.1999.786907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is important to establish the technology to accommodate best-effort TCP/IP traffic over wide area ATM networks. The UBR (unspecified bit rate) service category is the most typical service category for the best-effort traffic, especially in the LAN environment. On the other hand, the VBR (variable bit rate) service category with SCD (selective cell discard) option is considered as the service category which is appropriate for wide area networks due to its fairness and minimum guarantee of the cell transmission using not only PCR (peak cell rate) but SCR (sustainable cell rate) and MBS (maximum burst size). However, there is no actual evaluation for such service. We have, therefore, performed the experimental studies on TCP/IP over VBR with SCD service along with UBR and VBR without SCD cases. Through these experiments, we measured the link utilization of the effective data and the fairness between each obtained TCP/IP throughput during congestion of the ATM switch. From the results of the link utilization, the value is always over 90% under the various conditions. Therefore, even in the case of cell losses due to SCD or buffer overflow in ATM switch congestion, the average throughput is almost the same as the value which equals the trunk line speed divided by the number of the accommodated TCP/IP connections. From the results of the fairness, VBR with SCD has almost the same characteristics as UBR and obtains better TCP/IP throughput than VBR without SCD. Finally, we discuss the effectiveness of VBR with SCD and the other service categories, such as UBR and ABR (available bit rate), and conclude that VBR with SCD is one of the most suitable ATM service categories for wide area ATM networks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":266412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE ATM Workshop '99 Proceedings (Cat. No. 99TH8462)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE ATM Workshop '99 Proceedings (Cat. No. 99TH8462)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ATM.1999.786907\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE ATM Workshop '99 Proceedings (Cat. No. 99TH8462)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ATM.1999.786907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

重要的是建立一种技术,以适应广域ATM网络上的最佳TCP/IP流量。UBR(未指定比特率)业务类别是最典型的尽力而为流量服务类别,特别是在局域网环境中。另一方面,具有SCD(选择性小区丢弃)选项的VBR(可变比特率)服务类别被认为是适合于广域网的服务类别,因为它不仅使用PCR(峰值小区速率),而且使用SCR(可持续小区速率)和MBS(最大突发大小)对小区传输进行公平和最小保证。但是,对这种服务没有实际的评价。因此,我们对带SCD服务的VBR上的TCP/IP以及UBR和不带SCD的VBR进行了实验研究。通过这些实验,我们测量了ATM交换机在拥塞期间有效数据的链路利用率和每个获得的TCP/IP吞吐量之间的公平性。从链路利用率的结果来看,在各种条件下,该值都在90%以上。因此,即使在ATM交换机拥塞中由于SCD或缓冲区溢出导致cell丢失的情况下,平均吞吐量也几乎等于中继线速度除以可容纳的TCP/IP连接数的值。从公平性的结果来看,带SCD的VBR具有与UBR几乎相同的特性,并且比不带SCD的VBR获得更好的TCP/IP吞吐量。最后,我们讨论了VBR与SCD的有效性,以及其他业务类别,如UBR和ABR(可用比特率),得出VBR与SCD是最适合广域ATM网络的ATM业务类别之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A study on accommodation of TCP/IP best-effort traffic to wide area ATM network with VBR service category using selective cell discard
It is important to establish the technology to accommodate best-effort TCP/IP traffic over wide area ATM networks. The UBR (unspecified bit rate) service category is the most typical service category for the best-effort traffic, especially in the LAN environment. On the other hand, the VBR (variable bit rate) service category with SCD (selective cell discard) option is considered as the service category which is appropriate for wide area networks due to its fairness and minimum guarantee of the cell transmission using not only PCR (peak cell rate) but SCR (sustainable cell rate) and MBS (maximum burst size). However, there is no actual evaluation for such service. We have, therefore, performed the experimental studies on TCP/IP over VBR with SCD service along with UBR and VBR without SCD cases. Through these experiments, we measured the link utilization of the effective data and the fairness between each obtained TCP/IP throughput during congestion of the ATM switch. From the results of the link utilization, the value is always over 90% under the various conditions. Therefore, even in the case of cell losses due to SCD or buffer overflow in ATM switch congestion, the average throughput is almost the same as the value which equals the trunk line speed divided by the number of the accommodated TCP/IP connections. From the results of the fairness, VBR with SCD has almost the same characteristics as UBR and obtains better TCP/IP throughput than VBR without SCD. Finally, we discuss the effectiveness of VBR with SCD and the other service categories, such as UBR and ABR (available bit rate), and conclude that VBR with SCD is one of the most suitable ATM service categories for wide area ATM networks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信