决策树、随机森林和XGBoost预测光伏系统输出功率的比较研究

Audace B. K. Didavi, R. Agbokpanzo, M. Agbomahena
{"title":"决策树、随机森林和XGBoost预测光伏系统输出功率的比较研究","authors":"Audace B. K. Didavi, R. Agbokpanzo, M. Agbomahena","doi":"10.1109/BioSMART54244.2021.9677566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we make a comparative study of the performance of three methods for predicting the power output of a photovoltaic installation: Decision Tree, Random Forest and XGBoost. We performed these predictions in Python using as input meteorological data such as wind speed, sun position, temperature, direct irradiation, diffuse irradiation and reflected irradiation and as output data the power output of a 1000Wp panel. These data were downloaded from the PVGIS database for the city of Natitingou (Benin) and for a period of 12 years (from January 1st 2005 to December 31st 2016). We obtained as Mean Square Errors 2.195026, 3.058383 and 5.544319 respectively for the XGBoost, Random Forest and Decision Tree and for Regression Values 0.9999999194, 0.9999797366 and 0.9997013968 respectively for the XGBoost, Random Forest and Decision Tree. We conclude that all three models are effective for the forecasting task performed but that the XGBoost is the best performing model with Mean Square Error and Regression Value of 2.195026 and 0.9999999194 respectively.","PeriodicalId":286026,"journal":{"name":"2021 4th International Conference on Bio-Engineering for Smart Technologies (BioSMART)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of Decision Tree, Random Forest and XGBoost performance in forecasting the power output of a photovoltaic system\",\"authors\":\"Audace B. K. Didavi, R. Agbokpanzo, M. Agbomahena\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BioSMART54244.2021.9677566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we make a comparative study of the performance of three methods for predicting the power output of a photovoltaic installation: Decision Tree, Random Forest and XGBoost. We performed these predictions in Python using as input meteorological data such as wind speed, sun position, temperature, direct irradiation, diffuse irradiation and reflected irradiation and as output data the power output of a 1000Wp panel. These data were downloaded from the PVGIS database for the city of Natitingou (Benin) and for a period of 12 years (from January 1st 2005 to December 31st 2016). We obtained as Mean Square Errors 2.195026, 3.058383 and 5.544319 respectively for the XGBoost, Random Forest and Decision Tree and for Regression Values 0.9999999194, 0.9999797366 and 0.9997013968 respectively for the XGBoost, Random Forest and Decision Tree. We conclude that all three models are effective for the forecasting task performed but that the XGBoost is the best performing model with Mean Square Error and Regression Value of 2.195026 and 0.9999999194 respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 4th International Conference on Bio-Engineering for Smart Technologies (BioSMART)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 4th International Conference on Bio-Engineering for Smart Technologies (BioSMART)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BioSMART54244.2021.9677566\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 4th International Conference on Bio-Engineering for Smart Technologies (BioSMART)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BioSMART54244.2021.9677566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文对比研究了决策树、随机森林和XGBoost三种光伏发电系统输出功率预测方法的性能。我们在Python中使用气象数据(如风速、太阳位置、温度、直接照射、漫射照射和反射照射)作为输入,并使用1000Wp面板的输出功率数据进行这些预测。这些数据是从纳廷古市(贝宁)的PVGIS数据库下载的,时间为12年(2005年1月1日至2016年12月31日)。XGBoost、随机森林和决策树的均方误差分别为2.195026、3.058383和5.544319,XGBoost、随机森林和决策树的回归值分别为0.9999999194、0.9999797366和0.9997013968。我们得出结论,这三个模型都是有效的预测任务,但XGBoost是表现最好的模型,均方误差和回归值分别为2.195026和0.9999999194。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of Decision Tree, Random Forest and XGBoost performance in forecasting the power output of a photovoltaic system
In this paper, we make a comparative study of the performance of three methods for predicting the power output of a photovoltaic installation: Decision Tree, Random Forest and XGBoost. We performed these predictions in Python using as input meteorological data such as wind speed, sun position, temperature, direct irradiation, diffuse irradiation and reflected irradiation and as output data the power output of a 1000Wp panel. These data were downloaded from the PVGIS database for the city of Natitingou (Benin) and for a period of 12 years (from January 1st 2005 to December 31st 2016). We obtained as Mean Square Errors 2.195026, 3.058383 and 5.544319 respectively for the XGBoost, Random Forest and Decision Tree and for Regression Values 0.9999999194, 0.9999797366 and 0.9997013968 respectively for the XGBoost, Random Forest and Decision Tree. We conclude that all three models are effective for the forecasting task performed but that the XGBoost is the best performing model with Mean Square Error and Regression Value of 2.195026 and 0.9999999194 respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信