慢性抗抑郁药物和电休克对腹侧被盖多巴胺能神经元活动的影响:对Chenu et al.(2011)的回复。

C. H. West, J. Weiss
{"title":"慢性抗抑郁药物和电休克对腹侧被盖多巴胺能神经元活动的影响:对Chenu et al.(2011)的回复。","authors":"C. H. West, J. Weiss","doi":"10.1017/S1461145711001726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have read the letter commenting on our article entitled ‘Effects of chronic antidepressant drug administration and electroconvulsive shock on activity of dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmentum’. We offer the following response.\n\nThe authors of the letter direct attention to our mean spontaneous firing rate for dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA-DA neurons) being lower than typically found and particularly note that we included neurons with firing rates as low as 1.0 Hz. Our mean rates of firing are indeed somewhat lower than often reported by other investigators. We were clearly aware of this, specifically describing in our Methods section that we included slow-firing neurons. Our criteria for DA neurons in the VTA depended upon ( a ) stereotaxic location and then ( b ) the specific wave form of the unit as stated in the Procedure section, which is widely acknowledged for these neurons. Because we were recording multiple neurons in each animal, there was no way to mark individual neurons and identify their locations and/or characteristics histologically; consequently, we included neurons based on waveform. Given these criteria, we saw no basis for discarding neurons because their firing rate was slow and, consequently, such neurons were included.\n\nThe writers of the letter call attention to an article by Ungless et al. (2004), who described differences between DA and non-DA neurons in the VTA. The writers noted that our mean spontaneous firing rate was closer to that of non-dopaminergic cells than dopaminergic cells. However, the main point of the article by Ungless et al. was that VTA-DA neurons were inhibited by aversive or stressful stimuli whereas non-DA neurons were excited by such stimuli; they reported 10 of 12 DA neurons were inhibited by 10-s foot pinch whereas four of six non-DA neurons were excited by this stimulus. We have examined the …","PeriodicalId":394244,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of chronic antidepressant drug administration and electroconvulsive shock on activity of dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmentum: a reply to Chenu et al. (2011)\",\"authors\":\"C. H. West, J. Weiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1461145711001726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We have read the letter commenting on our article entitled ‘Effects of chronic antidepressant drug administration and electroconvulsive shock on activity of dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmentum’. We offer the following response.\\n\\nThe authors of the letter direct attention to our mean spontaneous firing rate for dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA-DA neurons) being lower than typically found and particularly note that we included neurons with firing rates as low as 1.0 Hz. Our mean rates of firing are indeed somewhat lower than often reported by other investigators. We were clearly aware of this, specifically describing in our Methods section that we included slow-firing neurons. Our criteria for DA neurons in the VTA depended upon ( a ) stereotaxic location and then ( b ) the specific wave form of the unit as stated in the Procedure section, which is widely acknowledged for these neurons. Because we were recording multiple neurons in each animal, there was no way to mark individual neurons and identify their locations and/or characteristics histologically; consequently, we included neurons based on waveform. Given these criteria, we saw no basis for discarding neurons because their firing rate was slow and, consequently, such neurons were included.\\n\\nThe writers of the letter call attention to an article by Ungless et al. (2004), who described differences between DA and non-DA neurons in the VTA. The writers noted that our mean spontaneous firing rate was closer to that of non-dopaminergic cells than dopaminergic cells. However, the main point of the article by Ungless et al. was that VTA-DA neurons were inhibited by aversive or stressful stimuli whereas non-DA neurons were excited by such stimuli; they reported 10 of 12 DA neurons were inhibited by 10-s foot pinch whereas four of six non-DA neurons were excited by this stimulus. We have examined the …\",\"PeriodicalId\":394244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1461145711001726\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1461145711001726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们已经阅读了这封评论我们题为“慢性抗抑郁药物和电休克对腹侧被盖多巴胺能神经元活动的影响”的文章的信。我们提供如下回应。这封信的作者直接注意到腹侧被盖区多巴胺能神经元(VTA-DA神经元)的平均自发放电率比通常发现的要低,并特别注意到我们包括了放电率低至1.0 Hz的神经元。我们的平均解雇率确实比其他研究者经常报道的要低一些。我们清楚地意识到这一点,在我们的方法部分中特别描述了我们包括慢燃神经元。我们对VTA内DA神经元的标准取决于(a)立体定向位置,然后(b)单元的特定波形,如程序部分所述,这在这些神经元中得到广泛认可。因为我们在每只动物中记录多个神经元,所以没有办法标记单个神经元并确定它们的位置和/或组织学特征;因此,我们基于波形纳入神经元。考虑到这些标准,我们没有看到丢弃神经元的依据,因为它们的放电速度很慢,因此,这些神经元被包括在内。这封信的作者提请注意unless等人(2004)的一篇文章,该文章描述了VTA中DA和非DA神经元之间的差异。作者注意到,我们的平均自发放电率比多巴胺能细胞更接近于非多巴胺能细胞。然而,Ungless等人的文章的主要观点是VTA-DA神经元受到厌恶或压力刺激的抑制,而非da神经元受到这种刺激的兴奋;他们报告说,12个DA神经元中有10个受到10秒脚挤压的抑制,而6个非DA神经元中有4个受到这种刺激。我们已经检查了……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of chronic antidepressant drug administration and electroconvulsive shock on activity of dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmentum: a reply to Chenu et al. (2011)
We have read the letter commenting on our article entitled ‘Effects of chronic antidepressant drug administration and electroconvulsive shock on activity of dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmentum’. We offer the following response. The authors of the letter direct attention to our mean spontaneous firing rate for dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA-DA neurons) being lower than typically found and particularly note that we included neurons with firing rates as low as 1.0 Hz. Our mean rates of firing are indeed somewhat lower than often reported by other investigators. We were clearly aware of this, specifically describing in our Methods section that we included slow-firing neurons. Our criteria for DA neurons in the VTA depended upon ( a ) stereotaxic location and then ( b ) the specific wave form of the unit as stated in the Procedure section, which is widely acknowledged for these neurons. Because we were recording multiple neurons in each animal, there was no way to mark individual neurons and identify their locations and/or characteristics histologically; consequently, we included neurons based on waveform. Given these criteria, we saw no basis for discarding neurons because their firing rate was slow and, consequently, such neurons were included. The writers of the letter call attention to an article by Ungless et al. (2004), who described differences between DA and non-DA neurons in the VTA. The writers noted that our mean spontaneous firing rate was closer to that of non-dopaminergic cells than dopaminergic cells. However, the main point of the article by Ungless et al. was that VTA-DA neurons were inhibited by aversive or stressful stimuli whereas non-DA neurons were excited by such stimuli; they reported 10 of 12 DA neurons were inhibited by 10-s foot pinch whereas four of six non-DA neurons were excited by this stimulus. We have examined the …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信