正义战争的目的和公平对待

Yitzhak Benbaji, D. Statman
{"title":"正义战争的目的和公平对待","authors":"Yitzhak Benbaji, D. Statman","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199577194.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter discusses the just aims of defensive wars, and, by implication, the duty to end wars, viz., the jus ex bello. It starts with a discussion of the idea of ‘uncompromising wars’ according to which wars may go on until one’s enemy military forces is completely destroyed. We offer a contractarian argument for a rule that categorically prohibits such wars. We then develop two asymmetries between the justice of resort to war and the justice of continuing it. In particular, we show that the conditions of proportionality and of probability of success function differently in constraining resort to war and in constraining its continuation.","PeriodicalId":102911,"journal":{"name":"War By Agreement","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Aims of Just Wars and Jus Ex Bello\",\"authors\":\"Yitzhak Benbaji, D. Statman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780199577194.003.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The chapter discusses the just aims of defensive wars, and, by implication, the duty to end wars, viz., the jus ex bello. It starts with a discussion of the idea of ‘uncompromising wars’ according to which wars may go on until one’s enemy military forces is completely destroyed. We offer a contractarian argument for a rule that categorically prohibits such wars. We then develop two asymmetries between the justice of resort to war and the justice of continuing it. In particular, we show that the conditions of proportionality and of probability of success function differently in constraining resort to war and in constraining its continuation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":102911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"War By Agreement\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"War By Agreement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199577194.003.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"War By Agreement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199577194.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一章讨论了防御战争的正当目的,并由此暗示了结束战争的义务,即,当然战权。它首先讨论了“不妥协战争”的概念,根据这个概念,战争可能会持续到敌人的军事力量被完全摧毁。我们提供了一个契约主义的论点,明确禁止这种战争的规则。然后我们发展了诉诸战争的正义和继续战争的正义之间的两种不对称。我们特别指出,比例条件和成功概率条件在限制诉诸战争和限制战争继续方面的作用是不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Aims of Just Wars and Jus Ex Bello
The chapter discusses the just aims of defensive wars, and, by implication, the duty to end wars, viz., the jus ex bello. It starts with a discussion of the idea of ‘uncompromising wars’ according to which wars may go on until one’s enemy military forces is completely destroyed. We offer a contractarian argument for a rule that categorically prohibits such wars. We then develop two asymmetries between the justice of resort to war and the justice of continuing it. In particular, we show that the conditions of proportionality and of probability of success function differently in constraining resort to war and in constraining its continuation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信