{"title":"构式的范畴语义","authors":"T. Ehrhard","doi":"10.1109/LICS.1988.5125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An abstract framework is proposed for the description of the type dependency semantics. It is claimed that the notion of fibration introduced by A. Grothendieck in the 1960s is perfectly adapted to this goal and provides the greatest simplicity and generality. This semantics is extended to higher order, and an explanation is given of what a general definition for the semantics of the theory of constructions could be.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":425186,"journal":{"name":"[1988] Proceedings. Third Annual Information Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A categorical semantics of constructions\",\"authors\":\"T. Ehrhard\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LICS.1988.5125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An abstract framework is proposed for the description of the type dependency semantics. It is claimed that the notion of fibration introduced by A. Grothendieck in the 1960s is perfectly adapted to this goal and provides the greatest simplicity and generality. This semantics is extended to higher order, and an explanation is given of what a general definition for the semantics of the theory of constructions could be.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":425186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1988] Proceedings. Third Annual Information Symposium on Logic in Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"49\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1988] Proceedings. Third Annual Information Symposium on Logic in Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.1988.5125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1988] Proceedings. Third Annual Information Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.1988.5125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An abstract framework is proposed for the description of the type dependency semantics. It is claimed that the notion of fibration introduced by A. Grothendieck in the 1960s is perfectly adapted to this goal and provides the greatest simplicity and generality. This semantics is extended to higher order, and an explanation is given of what a general definition for the semantics of the theory of constructions could be.<>