三次以上虹膜识别的统计评价

A. Czajka, K. Bowyer
{"title":"三次以上虹膜识别的统计评价","authors":"A. Czajka, K. Bowyer","doi":"10.1109/BTAS.2015.7358797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Real-world biometric applications often operate in the context of an identity transaction that allows up to three attempts. That is, if a biometric sample is acquired and if it does not result in a match, the user is allowed to acquire a second sample, and if it again does not result in a match, the user is allowed to acquire a third sample. If the third sample does not result in a match, then the transaction is ended with no match. We report results of an experiment to determine whether or not successive attempts can be considered as independent samples from the same distribution, and whether and how the quality of a biometric sample changes in successive attempts. To our knowledge, this is the first published research to investigate the statistics of multi-attempt biometric transactions. We find that the common assumption that the attempt outcomes come from independent and identically distributed random variables in multi-attempt biometric transactions is incorrect.","PeriodicalId":404972,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical evaluation of up-to-three-attempt iris recognition\",\"authors\":\"A. Czajka, K. Bowyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BTAS.2015.7358797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Real-world biometric applications often operate in the context of an identity transaction that allows up to three attempts. That is, if a biometric sample is acquired and if it does not result in a match, the user is allowed to acquire a second sample, and if it again does not result in a match, the user is allowed to acquire a third sample. If the third sample does not result in a match, then the transaction is ended with no match. We report results of an experiment to determine whether or not successive attempts can be considered as independent samples from the same distribution, and whether and how the quality of a biometric sample changes in successive attempts. To our knowledge, this is the first published research to investigate the statistics of multi-attempt biometric transactions. We find that the common assumption that the attempt outcomes come from independent and identically distributed random variables in multi-attempt biometric transactions is incorrect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS)\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BTAS.2015.7358797\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BTAS.2015.7358797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

现实世界的生物识别应用程序通常在允许最多三次尝试的身份事务环境中运行。也就是说,如果获得了生物识别样本,如果没有匹配,则允许用户获取第二个样本,如果再次没有匹配,则允许用户获取第三个样本。如果第三个样本没有匹配,则事务以不匹配结束。我们报告了一个实验的结果,以确定连续的尝试是否可以被视为来自同一分布的独立样本,以及在连续的尝试中生物识别样本的质量是否以及如何变化。据我们所知,这是首次发表的调查多尝试生物识别交易统计数据的研究。我们发现,在多尝试生物识别交易中,通常假设尝试结果来自独立且同分布的随机变量是不正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Statistical evaluation of up-to-three-attempt iris recognition
Real-world biometric applications often operate in the context of an identity transaction that allows up to three attempts. That is, if a biometric sample is acquired and if it does not result in a match, the user is allowed to acquire a second sample, and if it again does not result in a match, the user is allowed to acquire a third sample. If the third sample does not result in a match, then the transaction is ended with no match. We report results of an experiment to determine whether or not successive attempts can be considered as independent samples from the same distribution, and whether and how the quality of a biometric sample changes in successive attempts. To our knowledge, this is the first published research to investigate the statistics of multi-attempt biometric transactions. We find that the common assumption that the attempt outcomes come from independent and identically distributed random variables in multi-attempt biometric transactions is incorrect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信