南澳大利亚风电场能源输出预测:物理方法和深度学习方法的比较分析

Yijia Zhang
{"title":"南澳大利亚风电场能源输出预测:物理方法和深度学习方法的比较分析","authors":"Yijia Zhang","doi":"10.1109/ACMLC58173.2022.00023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To achieve the target of carbon zero” in 2050, the Australian government advocates the development of renewable energy technology to reduce CO2 emissions. Particularly, wind energy resources are rich in South Australia. With the development of wind farms, it is necessary to predict the energy output for the electricity market. This study compared two different methods for forecasting the wind energy output monthly. The first method is the physical method, using predicting weather data from Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). Another method is RNN-LSTM (Recurrent Neural Network-Long Short-Term Memory) by using Python to predict energy output. The result showed that the physical method can predict the trend of energy output value while RNN-LSTM is not suitable for monthly forecasting. This study proved that the deep learning methods should be utilized in the site that have numerous numbers of data resources. And it is better to use physical methods which consider the atmosphere, local terrain, and wind farm layout for wind farm energy outputs forecasting.","PeriodicalId":375920,"journal":{"name":"2022 5th Asia Conference on Machine Learning and Computing (ACMLC)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forecasting for Wind Farm Energy Output in South Australia: A Comparative Analysis of Physical Methods and Deep Learning Methods\",\"authors\":\"Yijia Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACMLC58173.2022.00023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To achieve the target of carbon zero” in 2050, the Australian government advocates the development of renewable energy technology to reduce CO2 emissions. Particularly, wind energy resources are rich in South Australia. With the development of wind farms, it is necessary to predict the energy output for the electricity market. This study compared two different methods for forecasting the wind energy output monthly. The first method is the physical method, using predicting weather data from Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). Another method is RNN-LSTM (Recurrent Neural Network-Long Short-Term Memory) by using Python to predict energy output. The result showed that the physical method can predict the trend of energy output value while RNN-LSTM is not suitable for monthly forecasting. This study proved that the deep learning methods should be utilized in the site that have numerous numbers of data resources. And it is better to use physical methods which consider the atmosphere, local terrain, and wind farm layout for wind farm energy outputs forecasting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 5th Asia Conference on Machine Learning and Computing (ACMLC)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 5th Asia Conference on Machine Learning and Computing (ACMLC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACMLC58173.2022.00023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 5th Asia Conference on Machine Learning and Computing (ACMLC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACMLC58173.2022.00023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了实现2050年“零碳排放”的目标,澳大利亚政府倡导发展可再生能源技术,以减少二氧化碳的排放。特别是,南澳大利亚州的风能资源丰富。随着风电场的发展,对电力市场的发电量进行预测是十分必要的。本研究比较了两种不同的预测每月风能输出的方法。第一种方法是物理方法,使用中期天气预报(ECMWF)的预测天气数据。另一种方法是使用Python预测能量输出的RNN-LSTM(循环神经网络-长短期记忆)。结果表明,物理方法可以预测发电量的变化趋势,而RNN-LSTM不适合逐月预测。本研究证明了深度学习方法应该应用于拥有大量数据资源的站点。采用考虑大气、局部地形、风电场布局等因素的物理方法进行风电场发电量预测效果较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forecasting for Wind Farm Energy Output in South Australia: A Comparative Analysis of Physical Methods and Deep Learning Methods
To achieve the target of carbon zero” in 2050, the Australian government advocates the development of renewable energy technology to reduce CO2 emissions. Particularly, wind energy resources are rich in South Australia. With the development of wind farms, it is necessary to predict the energy output for the electricity market. This study compared two different methods for forecasting the wind energy output monthly. The first method is the physical method, using predicting weather data from Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). Another method is RNN-LSTM (Recurrent Neural Network-Long Short-Term Memory) by using Python to predict energy output. The result showed that the physical method can predict the trend of energy output value while RNN-LSTM is not suitable for monthly forecasting. This study proved that the deep learning methods should be utilized in the site that have numerous numbers of data resources. And it is better to use physical methods which consider the atmosphere, local terrain, and wind farm layout for wind farm energy outputs forecasting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信