科技不会扼杀公共汽车——除非我们放任不管

Steven Higashide
{"title":"科技不会扼杀公共汽车——除非我们放任不管","authors":"Steven Higashide","doi":"10.5822/978-1-64283-015-6_8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When voters are asked to tax themselves to increase funding for public transit, most of the time the answer is yes. According to statistics compiled by the Center for Transportation Excellence (CFTE), transit referenda generally pass seven out of every ten times. But this number is inflated by a large number of routine transit tax renewal votes in places such as Perry, Michigan. When the vote is for high-­profile, high-­dollar, high-­stakes transit investments, success is less assured. In 2018, one of the highest-­profile, highest-­stakes campaigns took place in Nashville.","PeriodicalId":236378,"journal":{"name":"Better Buses, Better Cities","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technology Won’t Kill the Bus—­Unless We Let It\",\"authors\":\"Steven Higashide\",\"doi\":\"10.5822/978-1-64283-015-6_8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When voters are asked to tax themselves to increase funding for public transit, most of the time the answer is yes. According to statistics compiled by the Center for Transportation Excellence (CFTE), transit referenda generally pass seven out of every ten times. But this number is inflated by a large number of routine transit tax renewal votes in places such as Perry, Michigan. When the vote is for high-­profile, high-­dollar, high-­stakes transit investments, success is less assured. In 2018, one of the highest-­profile, highest-­stakes campaigns took place in Nashville.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Better Buses, Better Cities\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Better Buses, Better Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-64283-015-6_8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Better Buses, Better Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-64283-015-6_8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当选民被要求向自己征税以增加公共交通的资金时,大多数情况下答案是肯定的。根据交通卓越中心(CFTE)编制的统计数据,每十次公交公投中通常有七次通过。但这个数字被密歇根州佩里等地大量例行的交通税更新投票夸大了。当投票的是高调、高金额、高风险的交通投资时,成功就不那么确定了。2018年,纳什维尔发生了一场最引人注目、赌注最高的竞选活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technology Won’t Kill the Bus—­Unless We Let It
When voters are asked to tax themselves to increase funding for public transit, most of the time the answer is yes. According to statistics compiled by the Center for Transportation Excellence (CFTE), transit referenda generally pass seven out of every ten times. But this number is inflated by a large number of routine transit tax renewal votes in places such as Perry, Michigan. When the vote is for high-­profile, high-­dollar, high-­stakes transit investments, success is less assured. In 2018, one of the highest-­profile, highest-­stakes campaigns took place in Nashville.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信