根据工作经验、工作场所类型和复苏经验,评估波兰救生员对溺水受害者心肺复苏原理的知识

K. Starosta, Filip Jaśkiewicz, Krystyna Frydrysiak, Dawid Kowalewski, Krzysztof Guzenda, D. Timler
{"title":"根据工作经验、工作场所类型和复苏经验,评估波兰救生员对溺水受害者心肺复苏原理的知识","authors":"K. Starosta, Filip Jaśkiewicz, Krystyna Frydrysiak, Dawid Kowalewski, Krzysztof Guzenda, D. Timler","doi":"10.36740/emems202201106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The main aim of the study was to assess the lifeguards’ knowledge of qualified first aid depending on: work experi¬ence, type of workplace, experience in providing CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation). \nMaterial and methods: The study included 433 lifeguards. Males 60.05% (n=260). The mean age was 24.7±7.5. Management of a person after an episode of drowning, CPR, AED (automatic external defibrillation), oxygen therapy, methods of opening the airway were assessed using a questionnaire. Statistical analysis was carried out using PQStat set ver. 1.8.0.338. The correct answers in the group was compared by one-way analysis of variance and post-hoc test by Tukey and estimating the Fisher’s linear method. Test probability at p < 0.05 was considered as significant. \nResults: The mean of the results in the group was 74.65% ± 17.22. The correct answers in the study group differs significantly depending on work experience. The results in the group with the longest work experience are significantly higher than in the other groups. The correct answers in the surveyed group also differs significantly depending on the type of workplace. The results obtained in the group of sea lifeguards are significantly higher than in the other groups. The comparison of the groups indicates a significant trend proportional to the size of the waterbody. The correct answers differed significantly depending on the experience in providing CPR. \nConclusions: Work experience, type of workplace and experience in providing resuscitation have an impact on the lifeguards’ knowledge of selected elements of qualified first aid. Attention should be paid to the education of the group with the shortest work experience.","PeriodicalId":433523,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medical Service","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The assessment of the Polish lifeguards’ knowledge of the principles of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in victims of drowning depending on work experience, type of workplace and experience in resuscitation\",\"authors\":\"K. Starosta, Filip Jaśkiewicz, Krystyna Frydrysiak, Dawid Kowalewski, Krzysztof Guzenda, D. Timler\",\"doi\":\"10.36740/emems202201106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The main aim of the study was to assess the lifeguards’ knowledge of qualified first aid depending on: work experi¬ence, type of workplace, experience in providing CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation). \\nMaterial and methods: The study included 433 lifeguards. Males 60.05% (n=260). The mean age was 24.7±7.5. Management of a person after an episode of drowning, CPR, AED (automatic external defibrillation), oxygen therapy, methods of opening the airway were assessed using a questionnaire. Statistical analysis was carried out using PQStat set ver. 1.8.0.338. The correct answers in the group was compared by one-way analysis of variance and post-hoc test by Tukey and estimating the Fisher’s linear method. Test probability at p < 0.05 was considered as significant. \\nResults: The mean of the results in the group was 74.65% ± 17.22. The correct answers in the study group differs significantly depending on work experience. The results in the group with the longest work experience are significantly higher than in the other groups. The correct answers in the surveyed group also differs significantly depending on the type of workplace. The results obtained in the group of sea lifeguards are significantly higher than in the other groups. The comparison of the groups indicates a significant trend proportional to the size of the waterbody. The correct answers differed significantly depending on the experience in providing CPR. \\nConclusions: Work experience, type of workplace and experience in providing resuscitation have an impact on the lifeguards’ knowledge of selected elements of qualified first aid. Attention should be paid to the education of the group with the shortest work experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medical Service\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medical Service\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36740/emems202201106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medical Service","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/emems202201106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的主要目的是评估救生员的合格急救知识取决于:工作经验,工作场所类型,提供CPR(心肺复苏)的经验。材料与方法:研究对象为433名救生员。男性60.05% (n=260)。平均年龄24.7±7.5岁。对溺水患者的处理、心肺复苏术、体外自动除颤(AED)、氧疗、气道开放方法进行问卷调查。采用PQStat set ver进行统计分析。1.8.0.338. 组内正确答案的比较采用单向方差分析、Tukey事后检验和估计Fisher线性方法。检验概率p < 0.05为显著性。结果:两组结果的平均值为74.65%±17.22。学习小组的正确答案因工作经验的不同而有很大差异。工作经验最长的一组的结果明显高于其他组。根据工作场所的类型,被调查者的正确答案也有很大差异。海上救生员组的结果明显高于其他组。各组的比较显示出与水体大小成正比的显著趋势。根据提供心肺复苏术的经验不同,正确答案有显著差异。结论:工作经验、工作场所类型和提供复苏的经验对救生员对合格急救要素的选择知识有影响。要注意对工作经验最短的群体进行教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The assessment of the Polish lifeguards’ knowledge of the principles of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in victims of drowning depending on work experience, type of workplace and experience in resuscitation
Aim: The main aim of the study was to assess the lifeguards’ knowledge of qualified first aid depending on: work experi¬ence, type of workplace, experience in providing CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation). Material and methods: The study included 433 lifeguards. Males 60.05% (n=260). The mean age was 24.7±7.5. Management of a person after an episode of drowning, CPR, AED (automatic external defibrillation), oxygen therapy, methods of opening the airway were assessed using a questionnaire. Statistical analysis was carried out using PQStat set ver. 1.8.0.338. The correct answers in the group was compared by one-way analysis of variance and post-hoc test by Tukey and estimating the Fisher’s linear method. Test probability at p < 0.05 was considered as significant. Results: The mean of the results in the group was 74.65% ± 17.22. The correct answers in the study group differs significantly depending on work experience. The results in the group with the longest work experience are significantly higher than in the other groups. The correct answers in the surveyed group also differs significantly depending on the type of workplace. The results obtained in the group of sea lifeguards are significantly higher than in the other groups. The comparison of the groups indicates a significant trend proportional to the size of the waterbody. The correct answers differed significantly depending on the experience in providing CPR. Conclusions: Work experience, type of workplace and experience in providing resuscitation have an impact on the lifeguards’ knowledge of selected elements of qualified first aid. Attention should be paid to the education of the group with the shortest work experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信