合同法需要道德吗?

K. Krawiec, Wenhao Liu
{"title":"合同法需要道德吗?","authors":"K. Krawiec, Wenhao Liu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3069935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In \"The Dignity of Commerce\", Nathan Oman sets out an ambitious market theory of contract, which he argues is a superior normative foundation for contract law than either the moralist or economic justifications that currently dominate contract theory. In doing so, he sets out a robust defense of commerce and the marketplace as contributing to human flourishing that is a refreshing and welcome contribution in an era of market alarmism. But the market theory ultimately falls short as either a normative or prescriptive theory of contract. The extent to which law, public policy, and theory should account for values other than economic efficiency is a longstanding debate. Whatever the merits of that debate, we conclude that contract law does not need morality as envisioned by Oman — a fluid, subjective, and seemingly instinctual approach to the morality of markets.","PeriodicalId":430410,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Regulation of Contracting Private Parties (Topic)","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Contract Law Need Morality?\",\"authors\":\"K. Krawiec, Wenhao Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3069935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In \\\"The Dignity of Commerce\\\", Nathan Oman sets out an ambitious market theory of contract, which he argues is a superior normative foundation for contract law than either the moralist or economic justifications that currently dominate contract theory. In doing so, he sets out a robust defense of commerce and the marketplace as contributing to human flourishing that is a refreshing and welcome contribution in an era of market alarmism. But the market theory ultimately falls short as either a normative or prescriptive theory of contract. The extent to which law, public policy, and theory should account for values other than economic efficiency is a longstanding debate. Whatever the merits of that debate, we conclude that contract law does not need morality as envisioned by Oman — a fluid, subjective, and seemingly instinctual approach to the morality of markets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Regulation of Contracting Private Parties (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"134 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Regulation of Contracting Private Parties (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3069935\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Regulation of Contracting Private Parties (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3069935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在《商业的尊严》一书中,内森·阿曼提出了一个雄心勃勃的市场契约理论,他认为这是合同法的一个更优越的规范基础,而不是目前主导契约理论的道德或经济理由。在此过程中,他为商业和市场做出了强有力的辩护,认为它们有助于人类繁荣,这在市场危言耸听的时代是一种令人耳目一新的、受欢迎的贡献。但是,市场理论无论作为契约的规范性理论还是规定性理论,最终都是不够的。法律、公共政策和理论应该在多大程度上解释经济效率以外的价值,这是一个长期存在的争论。无论这场辩论的优点是什么,我们得出的结论是,合同法不需要阿曼所设想的道德——一种流动的、主观的、似乎是本能的市场道德方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Contract Law Need Morality?
In "The Dignity of Commerce", Nathan Oman sets out an ambitious market theory of contract, which he argues is a superior normative foundation for contract law than either the moralist or economic justifications that currently dominate contract theory. In doing so, he sets out a robust defense of commerce and the marketplace as contributing to human flourishing that is a refreshing and welcome contribution in an era of market alarmism. But the market theory ultimately falls short as either a normative or prescriptive theory of contract. The extent to which law, public policy, and theory should account for values other than economic efficiency is a longstanding debate. Whatever the merits of that debate, we conclude that contract law does not need morality as envisioned by Oman — a fluid, subjective, and seemingly instinctual approach to the morality of markets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信