金融自由化政策对收入不平等的影响

F. Saci
{"title":"金融自由化政策对收入不平等的影响","authors":"F. Saci","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3948240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p style=\"text-align:justify\"><br />\n<span style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"><span style=\"font-family:等线\"><span dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-family:\"Cambria\",serif\">This paper examines impacts of China’s financial liberalization policy on income inequality, through three channels: financial scale, financial structure and financial efficiency, an empirical analysis based on panel data of 30 provinces in China from 1996 to 2013 is conducted. The results confirm the Kuznets effect between financial scale, financial structure and income inequality. As the size of the financial sector expands, the financial structure is tilted toward direct financing, and the income gap among residents will experience a \"reverse U-shaped\" trend that rises first and then falls. Most of China has not yet passed the turning point, and is still in the upper bound of the \"inverted U-shaped\" curve. Financial liberalization policies will continue to exacerbate income inequality. The impact of financial efficiency on income distribution is quite different in different regions of China. After dividing the whole China into three regions according to the degree of economic development, it is found that the financial efficiency of the eastern and western regions has a Kuznets effect on the income gap, but compared with the eastern region, more provinces and cities in the western region have entered the stage of reducing the income inequality, and the financial development has a great impact on the western region. The effects of financial development on central China are weak, and income inequality increases with financial efficiency.</span></span></span></p>","PeriodicalId":346888,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Income Inequality (Topic)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Financial Liberalization Policies on Income Inequality\",\"authors\":\"F. Saci\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3948240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p style=\\\"text-align:justify\\\"><br />\\n<span style=\\\"font-size:10.5pt\\\"><span style=\\\"font-family:等线\\\"><span dir=\\\"ltr\\\" lang=\\\"EN-US\\\" style=\\\"font-family:\\\"Cambria\\\",serif\\\">This paper examines impacts of China’s financial liberalization policy on income inequality, through three channels: financial scale, financial structure and financial efficiency, an empirical analysis based on panel data of 30 provinces in China from 1996 to 2013 is conducted. The results confirm the Kuznets effect between financial scale, financial structure and income inequality. As the size of the financial sector expands, the financial structure is tilted toward direct financing, and the income gap among residents will experience a \\\"reverse U-shaped\\\" trend that rises first and then falls. Most of China has not yet passed the turning point, and is still in the upper bound of the \\\"inverted U-shaped\\\" curve. Financial liberalization policies will continue to exacerbate income inequality. The impact of financial efficiency on income distribution is quite different in different regions of China. After dividing the whole China into three regions according to the degree of economic development, it is found that the financial efficiency of the eastern and western regions has a Kuznets effect on the income gap, but compared with the eastern region, more provinces and cities in the western region have entered the stage of reducing the income inequality, and the financial development has a great impact on the western region. The effects of financial development on central China are weak, and income inequality increases with financial efficiency.</span></span></span></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":346888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Income Inequality (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Income Inequality (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3948240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Income Inequality (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3948240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文基于1996 - 2013年中国30个省份的面板数据,从金融规模、金融结构和金融效率三个渠道考察了中国金融自由化政策对收入不平等的影响。研究结果证实了金融规模、金融结构与收入不平等之间存在库兹涅茨效应。随着金融业规模的扩大,金融结构向直接融资倾斜,居民收入差距将呈现先升后降的“倒u型”趋势。中国大部分地区尚未越过拐点,仍处于“倒u型”曲线的上界。金融自由化政策将继续加剧收入不平等。金融效率对收入分配的影响在中国不同地区存在较大差异。将全国按经济发展程度划分为三个区域后发现,东西部地区的金融效率对收入差距存在库兹涅茨效应,但与东部地区相比,西部地区更多的省市进入了缩小收入不平等的阶段,金融发展对西部地区的影响较大。金融发展对中部地区的影响较弱,收入不平等随着金融效率的提高而加剧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Financial Liberalization Policies on Income Inequality


This paper examines impacts of China’s financial liberalization policy on income inequality, through three channels: financial scale, financial structure and financial efficiency, an empirical analysis based on panel data of 30 provinces in China from 1996 to 2013 is conducted. The results confirm the Kuznets effect between financial scale, financial structure and income inequality. As the size of the financial sector expands, the financial structure is tilted toward direct financing, and the income gap among residents will experience a "reverse U-shaped" trend that rises first and then falls. Most of China has not yet passed the turning point, and is still in the upper bound of the "inverted U-shaped" curve. Financial liberalization policies will continue to exacerbate income inequality. The impact of financial efficiency on income distribution is quite different in different regions of China. After dividing the whole China into three regions according to the degree of economic development, it is found that the financial efficiency of the eastern and western regions has a Kuznets effect on the income gap, but compared with the eastern region, more provinces and cities in the western region have entered the stage of reducing the income inequality, and the financial development has a great impact on the western region. The effects of financial development on central China are weak, and income inequality increases with financial efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信