Cynthia L. Foronda, Jeanne L Alhusen, C. Budhathoki, M. Lamb, Kim Tinsley, Brent R. Macwilliams, Jessie Daniels, Diana Baptiste, Kathie Kushto Reese, Eric B. Bauman
{"title":"一项混合方法，国际，多地点的研究，以开发和验证护士与医生在模拟中的沟通措施","authors":"Cynthia L. Foronda, Jeanne L Alhusen, C. Budhathoki, M. Lamb, Kim Tinsley, Brent R. Macwilliams, Jessie Daniels, Diana Baptiste, Kathie Kushto Reese, Eric B. Bauman","doi":"10.5480/15-1644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM This study examined the reliability and validity of the ISBAR Interprofessional Communication Rubric (IICR). BACKGROUND Improving education regarding communication in health care is a global priority. Communication is difficult to measure and no evaluation rubrics were located that uniquely focused on nurse‐to‐physician communication in simulation. METHOD This study used a mixed‐methods design and included five sites. RESULTS The IICR was determined reliable among nurse educator raters (rs = 0.79). The scale was found valid as assessed by nurse and physician experts (content validity index = 0.92). When describing their experience of using the tool, nurse educator raters described three categories: overall acceptability of the tool, ease of use, and perceptions of the importance of communication skills for patient safety. CONCLUSION Teaching and evaluating communication in simulation with a standardized rubric is a research area in need of further exploration and refinement.","PeriodicalId":153271,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Education Perspective","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Mixed‐Methods, International, Multisite Study to Develop and Validate a Measure of Nurse‐to‐Physician Communication in Simulation\",\"authors\":\"Cynthia L. Foronda, Jeanne L Alhusen, C. Budhathoki, M. Lamb, Kim Tinsley, Brent R. Macwilliams, Jessie Daniels, Diana Baptiste, Kathie Kushto Reese, Eric B. Bauman\",\"doi\":\"10.5480/15-1644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIM This study examined the reliability and validity of the ISBAR Interprofessional Communication Rubric (IICR). BACKGROUND Improving education regarding communication in health care is a global priority. Communication is difficult to measure and no evaluation rubrics were located that uniquely focused on nurse‐to‐physician communication in simulation. METHOD This study used a mixed‐methods design and included five sites. RESULTS The IICR was determined reliable among nurse educator raters (rs = 0.79). The scale was found valid as assessed by nurse and physician experts (content validity index = 0.92). When describing their experience of using the tool, nurse educator raters described three categories: overall acceptability of the tool, ease of use, and perceptions of the importance of communication skills for patient safety. CONCLUSION Teaching and evaluating communication in simulation with a standardized rubric is a research area in need of further exploration and refinement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Education Perspective\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Education Perspective\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5480/15-1644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Education Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5480/15-1644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Mixed‐Methods, International, Multisite Study to Develop and Validate a Measure of Nurse‐to‐Physician Communication in Simulation
AIM This study examined the reliability and validity of the ISBAR Interprofessional Communication Rubric (IICR). BACKGROUND Improving education regarding communication in health care is a global priority. Communication is difficult to measure and no evaluation rubrics were located that uniquely focused on nurse‐to‐physician communication in simulation. METHOD This study used a mixed‐methods design and included five sites. RESULTS The IICR was determined reliable among nurse educator raters (rs = 0.79). The scale was found valid as assessed by nurse and physician experts (content validity index = 0.92). When describing their experience of using the tool, nurse educator raters described three categories: overall acceptability of the tool, ease of use, and perceptions of the importance of communication skills for patient safety. CONCLUSION Teaching and evaluating communication in simulation with a standardized rubric is a research area in need of further exploration and refinement.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
