Mochlos or Makhlokes: JS和人文科学

Adam Zachary Newton
{"title":"Mochlos or Makhlokes: JS和人文科学","authors":"Adam Zachary Newton","doi":"10.5422/fordham/9780823283958.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Makhlokes” (Ashkenazi pronunciation) connotes “dissensus,” “separation,” “faction,” “dispute” (like German “Streit” in Kant’s Conflict of the Faculties). Its trilateral root חלק‎ HLK can signify either “to divide” or “to be smooth or viscous.” How, in light of this Mishnaic concept, does JS position itself with respect to academic humanities: as a mode or leverage, or at a node of energetic conflict and contestation? A conservative, polemical answer to that question was posed thirty years ago by the late and prodigious scholar of rabbinic Judaism Jacob Neusner in several books about the disciplines, research methodologies, and modes of Jewish Studies in specific relation to the “new Humanities.” A wealth of reformulation has accrued to the latter term in the last decade or so. This chapter reopens and reorients Neusner’s presentation of the case vis-à-vis a contemporaneous deployment of the same term by Derrida.","PeriodicalId":339401,"journal":{"name":"Jewish Studies as Counterlife","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mochlos or Makhlokes: JS and the Humanities\",\"authors\":\"Adam Zachary Newton\",\"doi\":\"10.5422/fordham/9780823283958.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“Makhlokes” (Ashkenazi pronunciation) connotes “dissensus,” “separation,” “faction,” “dispute” (like German “Streit” in Kant’s Conflict of the Faculties). Its trilateral root חלק‎ HLK can signify either “to divide” or “to be smooth or viscous.” How, in light of this Mishnaic concept, does JS position itself with respect to academic humanities: as a mode or leverage, or at a node of energetic conflict and contestation? A conservative, polemical answer to that question was posed thirty years ago by the late and prodigious scholar of rabbinic Judaism Jacob Neusner in several books about the disciplines, research methodologies, and modes of Jewish Studies in specific relation to the “new Humanities.” A wealth of reformulation has accrued to the latter term in the last decade or so. This chapter reopens and reorients Neusner’s presentation of the case vis-à-vis a contemporaneous deployment of the same term by Derrida.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jewish Studies as Counterlife\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jewish Studies as Counterlife\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823283958.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jewish Studies as Counterlife","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823283958.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“Makhlokes”(德系犹太语发音)意味着“异议”、“分离”、“派系”、“争议”(就像康德的《官能冲突》中的德语“Streit”)。它的三边词根hkk可以表示“分裂”或“光滑或粘稠”。在这种密西拿派的概念下,JS如何将自己定位于学术人文学科:作为一种模式或杠杆,还是处于充满活力的冲突和争论的节点?30年前,著名的拉比犹太教学者雅各布·纽斯纳(Jacob Neusner)在几本有关学科、研究方法和犹太研究模式的书中,就这个问题给出了一个保守的、有争议的答案。在过去十年左右的时间里,对后一个术语进行了大量的重新表述。这一章重新打开并重新定位了纽斯纳对-à-vis案例的陈述,这是德里达对同一术语的同时代部署。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mochlos or Makhlokes: JS and the Humanities
“Makhlokes” (Ashkenazi pronunciation) connotes “dissensus,” “separation,” “faction,” “dispute” (like German “Streit” in Kant’s Conflict of the Faculties). Its trilateral root חלק‎ HLK can signify either “to divide” or “to be smooth or viscous.” How, in light of this Mishnaic concept, does JS position itself with respect to academic humanities: as a mode or leverage, or at a node of energetic conflict and contestation? A conservative, polemical answer to that question was posed thirty years ago by the late and prodigious scholar of rabbinic Judaism Jacob Neusner in several books about the disciplines, research methodologies, and modes of Jewish Studies in specific relation to the “new Humanities.” A wealth of reformulation has accrued to the latter term in the last decade or so. This chapter reopens and reorients Neusner’s presentation of the case vis-à-vis a contemporaneous deployment of the same term by Derrida.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信