论强持续性句法遗忘

M. Berthold
{"title":"论强持续性句法遗忘","authors":"M. Berthold","doi":"10.24963/kr.2022/5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is generally agreed upon that so-called strong persistence (SP) captures best the essence of forgetting in logic programming. While classes of operators, such as F_R and F_SP, that satisfy immediate relaxations of (SP), and in the case of F_SP, even (SP) whenever possible, have been characterized semantically, many practical questions have yet to be addressed.\nThis technical paper aims to answer one of them: How can atoms be forgotten from a program without having to calculate its exponential number of models? To this end, we introduce two concrete representatives of F_R and F_SP that forget sets of atoms by syntactical manipulation of a program’s rules. This may in many cases prevent exponential blowups and produce a forgetting result that is close to the original program.","PeriodicalId":351970,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Syntactic Forgetting with Strong Persistence\",\"authors\":\"M. Berthold\",\"doi\":\"10.24963/kr.2022/5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is generally agreed upon that so-called strong persistence (SP) captures best the essence of forgetting in logic programming. While classes of operators, such as F_R and F_SP, that satisfy immediate relaxations of (SP), and in the case of F_SP, even (SP) whenever possible, have been characterized semantically, many practical questions have yet to be addressed.\\nThis technical paper aims to answer one of them: How can atoms be forgotten from a program without having to calculate its exponential number of models? To this end, we introduce two concrete representatives of F_R and F_SP that forget sets of atoms by syntactical manipulation of a program’s rules. This may in many cases prevent exponential blowups and produce a forgetting result that is close to the original program.\",\"PeriodicalId\":351970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2022/5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2022/5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

人们普遍认为,所谓的强持久性(strong persistence, SP)最好地抓住了逻辑编程中遗忘的本质。虽然诸如F_R和F_SP等满足(SP)的直接松弛的算子类,以及在F_SP的情况下,甚至在可能的情况下都满足(SP)的算子类,已经在语义上得到了表征,但许多实际问题还有待解决。这篇技术论文旨在回答其中一个问题:如何在不计算其指数模型的情况下从程序中忘记原子?为此,我们引入F_R和F_SP的两个具体表示,它们通过对程序规则的语法操作来忘记原子集。在许多情况下,这可以防止指数膨胀,并产生接近原始程序的遗忘结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Syntactic Forgetting with Strong Persistence
It is generally agreed upon that so-called strong persistence (SP) captures best the essence of forgetting in logic programming. While classes of operators, such as F_R and F_SP, that satisfy immediate relaxations of (SP), and in the case of F_SP, even (SP) whenever possible, have been characterized semantically, many practical questions have yet to be addressed. This technical paper aims to answer one of them: How can atoms be forgotten from a program without having to calculate its exponential number of models? To this end, we introduce two concrete representatives of F_R and F_SP that forget sets of atoms by syntactical manipulation of a program’s rules. This may in many cases prevent exponential blowups and produce a forgetting result that is close to the original program.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信