LS-MIMO系统二维doa估计两种阵列配置的比较研究

Sahbi Mazlout, M. Salah, A. Samet
{"title":"LS-MIMO系统二维doa估计两种阵列配置的比较研究","authors":"Sahbi Mazlout, M. Salah, A. Samet","doi":"10.1109/COMNET.2017.8285597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a comparison between two array geometries, including URA arrays and L-shaped arrays, for two-dimensional DOA estimation is presented. For each geometry, algorithm which achieved the more accurate 2D-DOA estimates is considered. Indeed, conjugate symmetry based subspace and 2D-ESPRIT estimators are, respectively, chosen for the estimation of the L-Shaped and URA structures. Various criteria are taken into consideration such us the angular spread. A comparative study of the performance of geometries is carried out in terms of RMSE over a wide range of scenarios. The advantages and drawbacks of each geometry and the respective DOA estimation approaches are illustrated through a numerical comparison.","PeriodicalId":192985,"journal":{"name":"2017 Sixth International Conference on Communications and Networking (ComNet)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of two array configurations for 2D-DOA estimation in LS-MIMO systems\",\"authors\":\"Sahbi Mazlout, M. Salah, A. Samet\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COMNET.2017.8285597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, a comparison between two array geometries, including URA arrays and L-shaped arrays, for two-dimensional DOA estimation is presented. For each geometry, algorithm which achieved the more accurate 2D-DOA estimates is considered. Indeed, conjugate symmetry based subspace and 2D-ESPRIT estimators are, respectively, chosen for the estimation of the L-Shaped and URA structures. Various criteria are taken into consideration such us the angular spread. A comparative study of the performance of geometries is carried out in terms of RMSE over a wide range of scenarios. The advantages and drawbacks of each geometry and the respective DOA estimation approaches are illustrated through a numerical comparison.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Sixth International Conference on Communications and Networking (ComNet)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Sixth International Conference on Communications and Networking (ComNet)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMNET.2017.8285597\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Sixth International Conference on Communications and Networking (ComNet)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMNET.2017.8285597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文比较了URA阵列和l形阵列两种阵列几何形状对二维DOA估计的影响。对于每种几何形状,都考虑了实现更精确2D-DOA估计的算法。实际上,分别选择基于共轭对称的子空间和2D-ESPRIT估计器来估计l形和URA结构。考虑了各种标准,如角扩展。在各种情况下,根据RMSE对几何形状的性能进行了比较研究。通过数值比较说明了每种几何形状和各自的DOA估计方法的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of two array configurations for 2D-DOA estimation in LS-MIMO systems
In this paper, a comparison between two array geometries, including URA arrays and L-shaped arrays, for two-dimensional DOA estimation is presented. For each geometry, algorithm which achieved the more accurate 2D-DOA estimates is considered. Indeed, conjugate symmetry based subspace and 2D-ESPRIT estimators are, respectively, chosen for the estimation of the L-Shaped and URA structures. Various criteria are taken into consideration such us the angular spread. A comparative study of the performance of geometries is carried out in terms of RMSE over a wide range of scenarios. The advantages and drawbacks of each geometry and the respective DOA estimation approaches are illustrated through a numerical comparison.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信