车辆运动跟踪性能评价的信息论方法

Daniel Clarke, Dennis Bruggner
{"title":"车辆运动跟踪性能评价的信息论方法","authors":"Daniel Clarke, Dennis Bruggner","doi":"10.23919/fusion43075.2019.9011376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Estimating the position, velocity and orientation of a vehicle is an extremely important aspect of highly assisted and autonomous driving scenarios. As a result of decades of research into this topic, there exist many tracking algorithms, each with different operating principles driven from different statistical frameworks. However, due to the complexity of the applications with which they are applied to, no algorithm has sufficient generality to be applied in all circumstances. While the topic of assessing the performance of algorithms has been investigated in the past, there exists no standardized framework for comparing the performance of different algorithms. In this paper we introduce an information theoretic framework which uses the Kullback Leibler Divergence to consider the relative information gain between different fusion algorithms. This framework is independent of the sensor systems and trajectories and considers only the technical operation of the algorithms. The results presented in this paper illustrate the utility of this approach and provide valuable insight for the development of algorithmic methodologies for real world vehicle dynamics estimation.","PeriodicalId":348881,"journal":{"name":"2019 22th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Information Theoretic Approach for Assessing the Performance of Vehicle Kinematic Tracking\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Clarke, Dennis Bruggner\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/fusion43075.2019.9011376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Estimating the position, velocity and orientation of a vehicle is an extremely important aspect of highly assisted and autonomous driving scenarios. As a result of decades of research into this topic, there exist many tracking algorithms, each with different operating principles driven from different statistical frameworks. However, due to the complexity of the applications with which they are applied to, no algorithm has sufficient generality to be applied in all circumstances. While the topic of assessing the performance of algorithms has been investigated in the past, there exists no standardized framework for comparing the performance of different algorithms. In this paper we introduce an information theoretic framework which uses the Kullback Leibler Divergence to consider the relative information gain between different fusion algorithms. This framework is independent of the sensor systems and trajectories and considers only the technical operation of the algorithms. The results presented in this paper illustrate the utility of this approach and provide valuable insight for the development of algorithmic methodologies for real world vehicle dynamics estimation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 22th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 22th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/fusion43075.2019.9011376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 22th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/fusion43075.2019.9011376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在高度辅助和自动驾驶场景中,估计车辆的位置、速度和方向是一个极其重要的方面。经过数十年对该主题的研究,存在许多跟踪算法,每种算法都有不同的工作原理,来自不同的统计框架。然而,由于应用它们的应用程序的复杂性,没有一个算法具有足够的通用性,可以应用于所有情况。虽然过去已经研究了评估算法性能的主题,但没有标准化的框架来比较不同算法的性能。本文介绍了一种利用Kullback Leibler散度来考虑不同融合算法之间的相对信息增益的信息理论框架。该框架独立于传感器系统和轨迹,只考虑算法的技术操作。本文给出的结果说明了这种方法的实用性,并为开发用于真实世界车辆动力学估计的算法方法提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Information Theoretic Approach for Assessing the Performance of Vehicle Kinematic Tracking
Estimating the position, velocity and orientation of a vehicle is an extremely important aspect of highly assisted and autonomous driving scenarios. As a result of decades of research into this topic, there exist many tracking algorithms, each with different operating principles driven from different statistical frameworks. However, due to the complexity of the applications with which they are applied to, no algorithm has sufficient generality to be applied in all circumstances. While the topic of assessing the performance of algorithms has been investigated in the past, there exists no standardized framework for comparing the performance of different algorithms. In this paper we introduce an information theoretic framework which uses the Kullback Leibler Divergence to consider the relative information gain between different fusion algorithms. This framework is independent of the sensor systems and trajectories and considers only the technical operation of the algorithms. The results presented in this paper illustrate the utility of this approach and provide valuable insight for the development of algorithmic methodologies for real world vehicle dynamics estimation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信