靶向相互作用的代理

Nikhil Vellodi, Joshua A. Weiss
{"title":"靶向相互作用的代理","authors":"Nikhil Vellodi, Joshua A. Weiss","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3921611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We introduce a novel framework to study targeted policy interventions. Agents: 1) differ both in their likelihood of and loss from interaction, 2) exert negative externalities through interaction, and 3) can exert costly effort to isolate. Additionally, a planner can select a subset of agents to isolate from interaction at zero cost. Our main result is a full characterization of optimal policies when costly isolation is either voluntary or mandatory. When voluntary, optimal policy is non-monotone -- agents with intermediate vulnerability are selected more. Moreover, we uncover a novel form of risk compensation -- voluntary behavior implies that selection is redirected toward the vulnerable away from the interactive, to maintain incentives for self-isolation. We extend our insights to a setting with positive externalities, and apply our results to applications including vaccine allocation, platform design, and information aggregation.","PeriodicalId":113748,"journal":{"name":"Public Economics: Publicly Provided Goods eJournal","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Targeting Interacting Agents\",\"authors\":\"Nikhil Vellodi, Joshua A. Weiss\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3921611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We introduce a novel framework to study targeted policy interventions. Agents: 1) differ both in their likelihood of and loss from interaction, 2) exert negative externalities through interaction, and 3) can exert costly effort to isolate. Additionally, a planner can select a subset of agents to isolate from interaction at zero cost. Our main result is a full characterization of optimal policies when costly isolation is either voluntary or mandatory. When voluntary, optimal policy is non-monotone -- agents with intermediate vulnerability are selected more. Moreover, we uncover a novel form of risk compensation -- voluntary behavior implies that selection is redirected toward the vulnerable away from the interactive, to maintain incentives for self-isolation. We extend our insights to a setting with positive externalities, and apply our results to applications including vaccine allocation, platform design, and information aggregation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Economics: Publicly Provided Goods eJournal\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Economics: Publicly Provided Goods eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3921611\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Economics: Publicly Provided Goods eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3921611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们引入了一个新的框架来研究有针对性的政策干预。代理人:1)在相互作用的可能性和损失上不同,2)通过相互作用产生负外部性,3)可以付出昂贵的努力来孤立。此外,计划器可以选择一个代理子集,以零成本将其与交互隔离开来。我们的主要结果是,在代价高昂的隔离是自愿的还是强制性的情况下,充分描述了最优政策。当自愿时,最优策略是非单调的,具有中间脆弱性的代理被更多地选择。此外,我们发现了一种新的风险补偿形式——自愿行为意味着选择被重新定向到弱势群体,远离互动,以保持自我隔离的动机。我们将我们的见解扩展到具有正外部性的环境中,并将我们的结果应用于疫苗分配、平台设计和信息聚合等应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Targeting Interacting Agents
We introduce a novel framework to study targeted policy interventions. Agents: 1) differ both in their likelihood of and loss from interaction, 2) exert negative externalities through interaction, and 3) can exert costly effort to isolate. Additionally, a planner can select a subset of agents to isolate from interaction at zero cost. Our main result is a full characterization of optimal policies when costly isolation is either voluntary or mandatory. When voluntary, optimal policy is non-monotone -- agents with intermediate vulnerability are selected more. Moreover, we uncover a novel form of risk compensation -- voluntary behavior implies that selection is redirected toward the vulnerable away from the interactive, to maintain incentives for self-isolation. We extend our insights to a setting with positive externalities, and apply our results to applications including vaccine allocation, platform design, and information aggregation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信