{"title":"卡希扬-鲍比的“西化”:异族通婚、父系化还是为了纳托鲁?","authors":"A. Saptomo, Journal Manager Apha","doi":"10.46816/jial.v1i1.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is the result of an analysis of the marriage event of two people that have different ethnicities, Javanese and Batak, and the kinship system, Parental and Patrilinieal. In the marriage process which was carried out according to the patrilineal kinship sistem followed by giving the clan title from Batak. The question, is such marriage an interadat, or patrilinealisation, dalihan na tolu? To answer it, socio-antro legal research was done by implementating the complementary approaches, adat law science and legal anthropology. The result, the marriage isn’t named antaradat, the mentioned marriage has been legal according to the adat Batak in which the one party received one of the clans in the Batak ethnic so that the marriage is the endogamy marriage of the ethnic and the exogamy of the clan and keep on dalihan na tolu.","PeriodicalId":372102,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indonesian Adat Law (JIAL)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Siregarization\\\" of Kahiyang-Bobby: Inter-Indigenous Marriage, Patrilinealization or For the sake of Na Tolu?\",\"authors\":\"A. Saptomo, Journal Manager Apha\",\"doi\":\"10.46816/jial.v1i1.20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is the result of an analysis of the marriage event of two people that have different ethnicities, Javanese and Batak, and the kinship system, Parental and Patrilinieal. In the marriage process which was carried out according to the patrilineal kinship sistem followed by giving the clan title from Batak. The question, is such marriage an interadat, or patrilinealisation, dalihan na tolu? To answer it, socio-antro legal research was done by implementating the complementary approaches, adat law science and legal anthropology. The result, the marriage isn’t named antaradat, the mentioned marriage has been legal according to the adat Batak in which the one party received one of the clans in the Batak ethnic so that the marriage is the endogamy marriage of the ethnic and the exogamy of the clan and keep on dalihan na tolu.\",\"PeriodicalId\":372102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Indonesian Adat Law (JIAL)\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Indonesian Adat Law (JIAL)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46816/jial.v1i1.20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indonesian Adat Law (JIAL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46816/jial.v1i1.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文是对爪哇人与巴塔克人这两个不同种族的人的婚姻事件,以及亲缘关系制度(parent and patrilinial)进行分析的结果。在根据父系亲属制度进行的婚姻过程中,随后从巴塔克获得氏族头衔。问题是,这样的婚姻是一种内部联姻,还是父系化?为此,运用法律科学与法律人类学相辅相成的方法进行了社会法学研究。结果,这段婚姻没有被命名为antaradat,上面提到的婚姻是合法的根据adat Batak其中一方接受了Batak族的一个氏族所以这段婚姻是该民族的内婚制和该氏族的外婚制继续dalihan na tolu。
"Siregarization" of Kahiyang-Bobby: Inter-Indigenous Marriage, Patrilinealization or For the sake of Na Tolu?
This paper is the result of an analysis of the marriage event of two people that have different ethnicities, Javanese and Batak, and the kinship system, Parental and Patrilinieal. In the marriage process which was carried out according to the patrilineal kinship sistem followed by giving the clan title from Batak. The question, is such marriage an interadat, or patrilinealisation, dalihan na tolu? To answer it, socio-antro legal research was done by implementating the complementary approaches, adat law science and legal anthropology. The result, the marriage isn’t named antaradat, the mentioned marriage has been legal according to the adat Batak in which the one party received one of the clans in the Batak ethnic so that the marriage is the endogamy marriage of the ethnic and the exogamy of the clan and keep on dalihan na tolu.