JICSB翻译:大胆定位,冲击更广、更深

Thomas G. Pittz, Jeffrey R. Alves, Ayman El tarabishy, E. Liguori, K. Passerini
{"title":"JICSB翻译:大胆定位,冲击更广、更深","authors":"Thomas G. Pittz, Jeffrey R. Alves, Ayman El tarabishy, E. Liguori, K. Passerini","doi":"10.1080/26437015.2021.1989637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Does our research influence how entrepreneurs and small business owners think or accomplish their business objectives? Does our research effectively inform policy such that legislation is largely evidence-based? Is our research contributing to solving some of the world’s greatest challenges (for example, the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, the Navol/tcgqtional Academy of Engineering Grand Challenges) at a pace proportionate to society’s collective need for solutions? Many individuals (for example, scholars, grant funding agencies, policy makers, practitioners, editors, authors) worry contemporary entrepreneurship and small business research (and most academic research more broadly) has little impact on practice, does not effectively inform policy, and is not producing output proportionate to the global need for solutions to the world’s biggest problems. Aguinis et al. (2014) suggested the theory–practice divide is largely due to the fact that “[t]he majority of inquiry on scholarly impact has focused almost exclusively on one particular stakeholder and one type of measure: academics and citations” (p. 624). While, as scholars and editors, we appreciate citations, these are insular metrics to academia’s ivory tower that only indirectly facilitate translation to practice, primarily through textbooks (Aguinis et al., 2019). Exacerbating the divide, while societal need for solutions continues to increase, fewer incentives and less of a researcher’s time are available to devote to practical relevance (Eckhardt & Wetherbe, 2014). This leaves academia and practice at a standstill, with each looking to the other to figure out how to build a better bridge. For too long, research translation has been left primarily to chance, yet real impact is the “result of agency and a desire for change” (Fenby-Hulse, 2019, p. 191). Therefore, we are pleased to announce in this editorial a new initiative by the International Council for Small Business (ICSB) directly aimed at facilitating translation between its flagship academic journal, the Journal of Small Business Management (JSBM), and its applied, practitioner-, and policy maker–oriented journal, the Journal of the International Council for Small Business (JICSB). Specifically, ICSB is pleased to announce a new article type to be published in JICSB (viz., JICSB Translation), aimed at bridging the theory–practice divide by purposefully working with authors of accepted JSBM articles to develop policy maker– and practitioner-translated versions of their research for broader dissemination. JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SMALL BUSINESS 2021, VOL. 2, NO. 4, 275–277 https://doi.org/10.1080/26437015.2021.1989637","PeriodicalId":246224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Council for Small Business","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"JICSB Translation: Boldly positioning for broader and deeper impact\",\"authors\":\"Thomas G. Pittz, Jeffrey R. Alves, Ayman El tarabishy, E. Liguori, K. Passerini\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26437015.2021.1989637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Does our research influence how entrepreneurs and small business owners think or accomplish their business objectives? Does our research effectively inform policy such that legislation is largely evidence-based? Is our research contributing to solving some of the world’s greatest challenges (for example, the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, the Navol/tcgqtional Academy of Engineering Grand Challenges) at a pace proportionate to society’s collective need for solutions? Many individuals (for example, scholars, grant funding agencies, policy makers, practitioners, editors, authors) worry contemporary entrepreneurship and small business research (and most academic research more broadly) has little impact on practice, does not effectively inform policy, and is not producing output proportionate to the global need for solutions to the world’s biggest problems. Aguinis et al. (2014) suggested the theory–practice divide is largely due to the fact that “[t]he majority of inquiry on scholarly impact has focused almost exclusively on one particular stakeholder and one type of measure: academics and citations” (p. 624). While, as scholars and editors, we appreciate citations, these are insular metrics to academia’s ivory tower that only indirectly facilitate translation to practice, primarily through textbooks (Aguinis et al., 2019). Exacerbating the divide, while societal need for solutions continues to increase, fewer incentives and less of a researcher’s time are available to devote to practical relevance (Eckhardt & Wetherbe, 2014). This leaves academia and practice at a standstill, with each looking to the other to figure out how to build a better bridge. For too long, research translation has been left primarily to chance, yet real impact is the “result of agency and a desire for change” (Fenby-Hulse, 2019, p. 191). Therefore, we are pleased to announce in this editorial a new initiative by the International Council for Small Business (ICSB) directly aimed at facilitating translation between its flagship academic journal, the Journal of Small Business Management (JSBM), and its applied, practitioner-, and policy maker–oriented journal, the Journal of the International Council for Small Business (JICSB). Specifically, ICSB is pleased to announce a new article type to be published in JICSB (viz., JICSB Translation), aimed at bridging the theory–practice divide by purposefully working with authors of accepted JSBM articles to develop policy maker– and practitioner-translated versions of their research for broader dissemination. JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SMALL BUSINESS 2021, VOL. 2, NO. 4, 275–277 https://doi.org/10.1080/26437015.2021.1989637\",\"PeriodicalId\":246224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International Council for Small Business\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International Council for Small Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26437015.2021.1989637\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Council for Small Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26437015.2021.1989637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们的研究是否会影响企业家和小企业主的想法或实现他们的商业目标?我们的研究是否有效地为政策提供信息,使立法在很大程度上以证据为基础?我们的研究是否有助于解决一些世界上最大的挑战(例如,联合国可持续发展目标,纳沃/工程学院大挑战),其速度与社会对解决方案的集体需求成比例?许多个人(例如,学者、资助机构、政策制定者、从业者、编辑、作者)担心当代创业和小企业研究(以及更广泛的大多数学术研究)对实践的影响很小,不能有效地为政策提供信息,也不能产生与全球对解决世界最大问题的需求相称的产出。Aguinis等人(2014)认为,理论与实践之间的鸿沟很大程度上是由于“大多数关于学术影响的调查几乎完全集中在一个特定的利益相关者和一种衡量标准上:学术和引用”(第624页)。虽然,作为学者和编辑,我们欣赏引用,但这些是学术界象牙塔的孤立指标,只能间接促进翻译实践,主要是通过教科书(Aguinis et al., 2019)。在社会对解决方案的需求持续增加的同时,更少的激励和更少的研究人员的时间可用于实际相关性(Eckhardt & Wetherbe, 2014),这加剧了鸿沟。这使得学术界和实践都处于停滞状态,双方都在寻找如何建立一座更好的桥梁。长期以来,研究翻译主要是靠运气,但真正的影响是“机构和变革愿望的结果”(Fenby-Hulse, 2019,第191页)。因此,我们很高兴地在这篇社论中宣布,国际小企业理事会(ICSB)发起了一项新的倡议,旨在促进其旗舰学术期刊《小企业管理杂志》(JSBM)与它的应用型、实践者型和决策者型期刊《国际小企业理事会杂志》(JICSB)之间的翻译。具体来说,ICSB很高兴地宣布,将在JICSB上发表一种新的文章类型(即JICSB翻译),旨在通过有目的地与被接受的JICSB文章的作者合作,开发决策者和从业者翻译的研究版本,以弥合理论与实践的鸿沟,以便更广泛地传播。《国际小企业理事会杂志》,2021年,第2卷,第2期。4,275 - 277 https://doi.org/10.1080/26437015.2021.1989637
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
JICSB Translation: Boldly positioning for broader and deeper impact
Does our research influence how entrepreneurs and small business owners think or accomplish their business objectives? Does our research effectively inform policy such that legislation is largely evidence-based? Is our research contributing to solving some of the world’s greatest challenges (for example, the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, the Navol/tcgqtional Academy of Engineering Grand Challenges) at a pace proportionate to society’s collective need for solutions? Many individuals (for example, scholars, grant funding agencies, policy makers, practitioners, editors, authors) worry contemporary entrepreneurship and small business research (and most academic research more broadly) has little impact on practice, does not effectively inform policy, and is not producing output proportionate to the global need for solutions to the world’s biggest problems. Aguinis et al. (2014) suggested the theory–practice divide is largely due to the fact that “[t]he majority of inquiry on scholarly impact has focused almost exclusively on one particular stakeholder and one type of measure: academics and citations” (p. 624). While, as scholars and editors, we appreciate citations, these are insular metrics to academia’s ivory tower that only indirectly facilitate translation to practice, primarily through textbooks (Aguinis et al., 2019). Exacerbating the divide, while societal need for solutions continues to increase, fewer incentives and less of a researcher’s time are available to devote to practical relevance (Eckhardt & Wetherbe, 2014). This leaves academia and practice at a standstill, with each looking to the other to figure out how to build a better bridge. For too long, research translation has been left primarily to chance, yet real impact is the “result of agency and a desire for change” (Fenby-Hulse, 2019, p. 191). Therefore, we are pleased to announce in this editorial a new initiative by the International Council for Small Business (ICSB) directly aimed at facilitating translation between its flagship academic journal, the Journal of Small Business Management (JSBM), and its applied, practitioner-, and policy maker–oriented journal, the Journal of the International Council for Small Business (JICSB). Specifically, ICSB is pleased to announce a new article type to be published in JICSB (viz., JICSB Translation), aimed at bridging the theory–practice divide by purposefully working with authors of accepted JSBM articles to develop policy maker– and practitioner-translated versions of their research for broader dissemination. JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SMALL BUSINESS 2021, VOL. 2, NO. 4, 275–277 https://doi.org/10.1080/26437015.2021.1989637
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信