用客观度量方法估计带水印音频信号的质量

K. Kondo
{"title":"用客观度量方法估计带水印音频信号的质量","authors":"K. Kondo","doi":"10.1109/IIH-MSP.2013.78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares two objective audio quality assessment measures calculated for three watermark methods with its corresponding subjective quality. The aim was to see if these measures could be used to estimate the subjective audio quality with various watermarks. Samples were watermarked with the LSB substitution, the direct spread-spectrum, and the echo hiding methods. The objective scores were calculated using peaqb, an implementation of the ITU-R BS.1387-1 standard, and PEMO-Q. PEMO-Q showed significantly higher correlation, about 0.90 compared to peaqb. Initial quality estimation tests were also conducted, where regression from objective score to the subjective score of one watermark (e.g. LSB) was estimated, and this regression was used to estimate the subjective score of another watermark method (e.g. spread-spectrum) from its objective score. PEMO-Q showed higher estimation accuracy, with Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of about 11%.","PeriodicalId":105427,"journal":{"name":"2013 Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Estimation of Quality of Watermarked Audio Signal Using Objective Measures\",\"authors\":\"K. Kondo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IIH-MSP.2013.78\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares two objective audio quality assessment measures calculated for three watermark methods with its corresponding subjective quality. The aim was to see if these measures could be used to estimate the subjective audio quality with various watermarks. Samples were watermarked with the LSB substitution, the direct spread-spectrum, and the echo hiding methods. The objective scores were calculated using peaqb, an implementation of the ITU-R BS.1387-1 standard, and PEMO-Q. PEMO-Q showed significantly higher correlation, about 0.90 compared to peaqb. Initial quality estimation tests were also conducted, where regression from objective score to the subjective score of one watermark (e.g. LSB) was estimated, and this regression was used to estimate the subjective score of another watermark method (e.g. spread-spectrum) from its objective score. PEMO-Q showed higher estimation accuracy, with Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of about 11%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":105427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IIH-MSP.2013.78\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IIH-MSP.2013.78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文将三种水印方法计算的两种客观音质评价测度与其相应的主观音质进行了比较。目的是看看这些措施是否可以用来估计主观音频质量与各种水印。采用LSB替换、直接扩频和回波隐藏等方法对样本进行了水印处理。使用peaqb (ITU-R BS.1387-1标准的实现)和PEMO-Q计算客观分数。pomo - q与peaqb的相关性为0.90。还进行了初始质量估计测试,其中估计从客观评分到主观评分的一个水印(例如LSB)的回归,并使用该回归从其客观评分估计另一个水印方法(例如扩频)的主观评分。PEMO-Q具有较高的估计精度,均方根误差(RMSE)约为11%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards Estimation of Quality of Watermarked Audio Signal Using Objective Measures
This paper compares two objective audio quality assessment measures calculated for three watermark methods with its corresponding subjective quality. The aim was to see if these measures could be used to estimate the subjective audio quality with various watermarks. Samples were watermarked with the LSB substitution, the direct spread-spectrum, and the echo hiding methods. The objective scores were calculated using peaqb, an implementation of the ITU-R BS.1387-1 standard, and PEMO-Q. PEMO-Q showed significantly higher correlation, about 0.90 compared to peaqb. Initial quality estimation tests were also conducted, where regression from objective score to the subjective score of one watermark (e.g. LSB) was estimated, and this regression was used to estimate the subjective score of another watermark method (e.g. spread-spectrum) from its objective score. PEMO-Q showed higher estimation accuracy, with Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of about 11%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信