社交互动机器人。为什么我们目前对它们的看法仍然有效

Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication Pub Date : 2002-12-10 DOI:10.1109/ROMAN.2002.1045681

Colin T. Schmidt

{"title":"社交互动机器人。为什么我们目前对它们的看法仍然有效","authors":"Colin T. Schmidt","doi":"10.1109/ROMAN.2002.1045681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discussion about the application of scientific knowledge in robotics in order to build people helpers is widespread. The issue herein addressed is philosophically poignant, that of robots that are 'people'. It is currently popular to speak about robots and the image of Man. Behind this lurks the dialogical mind and the questions on its artificial existence. Without intending to defend or refute the discourse in favour of 'recreating' Man, a lesser familiar question is brought forth: 'Given that we are capable of creating a man (constructing a robot-person), what would the consequences of this be and would we be satisfied with such technology?' Thorny topic; it questions the entire knowledge foundation upon which strong AI/Robotics is positioned. The author argues for improved monitoring of technological progress and thus favours 'soft' (weak) implementation techniques.","PeriodicalId":222409,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socially interactive robots. Why our current beliefs about them still work\",\"authors\":\"Colin T. Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ROMAN.2002.1045681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Discussion about the application of scientific knowledge in robotics in order to build people helpers is widespread. The issue herein addressed is philosophically poignant, that of robots that are 'people'. It is currently popular to speak about robots and the image of Man. Behind this lurks the dialogical mind and the questions on its artificial existence. Without intending to defend or refute the discourse in favour of 'recreating' Man, a lesser familiar question is brought forth: 'Given that we are capable of creating a man (constructing a robot-person), what would the consequences of this be and would we be satisfied with such technology?' Thorny topic; it questions the entire knowledge foundation upon which strong AI/Robotics is positioned. The author argues for improved monitoring of technological progress and thus favours 'soft' (weak) implementation techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":222409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2002.1045681\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2002.1045681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

关于将科学知识应用于机器人以制造人类助手的讨论非常广泛。这里讨论的问题在哲学上是尖锐的，即机器人是“人”。目前，谈论机器人和人类形象是很流行的。在这背后隐藏着对话的心灵及其人为存在的问题。无意为“再造”人类的观点辩护或反驳，这里提出了一个不那么熟悉的问题:“既然我们有能力创造一个人(建造一个机器人人)，那么这样做的后果会是什么?我们会对这样的技术感到满意吗?”棘手的话题;它质疑强大的人工智能/机器人所依赖的整个知识基础。作者主张改进对技术进步的监测，从而支持“软”(弱)实施技术。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Socially interactive robots. Why our current beliefs about them still work

Discussion about the application of scientific knowledge in robotics in order to build people helpers is widespread. The issue herein addressed is philosophically poignant, that of robots that are 'people'. It is currently popular to speak about robots and the image of Man. Behind this lurks the dialogical mind and the questions on its artificial existence. Without intending to defend or refute the discourse in favour of 'recreating' Man, a lesser familiar question is brought forth: 'Given that we are capable of creating a man (constructing a robot-person), what would the consequences of this be and would we be satisfied with such technology?' Thorny topic; it questions the entire knowledge foundation upon which strong AI/Robotics is positioned. The author argues for improved monitoring of technological progress and thus favours 'soft' (weak) implementation techniques.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication

自引率

0.00%

发文量