一种评价RC4精炼最优性的方法

Suman Das, H. Dey, R. Ghosh
{"title":"一种评价RC4精炼最优性的方法","authors":"Suman Das, H. Dey, R. Ghosh","doi":"10.1109/C3IT.2015.7060139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though RC4 has proved itself as a simple, fast and robust stream cipher and it is trusted by many organizations, a number of researchers claimed that RC4 has some weakness and bias in its internal states. To increase its security, some guidelines recommended discarding some initial bytes like N, 2N or more from the RC4 key-stream (N is 256, generally). In this paper, the authors tried to find out the optimum number of bytes that is to be discarded to have a more secured RC4, by analyzing some variants of it. All the algorithms, including the original one, are analyzed by the NIST Statistical Test Suite and it has been found that it is not necessary discarding more and more number of bytes to increase the security of RC4.","PeriodicalId":402311,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2015 Third International Conference on Computer, Communication, Control and Information Technology (C3IT)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An approach to assess the optimality of refining RC4\",\"authors\":\"Suman Das, H. Dey, R. Ghosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/C3IT.2015.7060139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Though RC4 has proved itself as a simple, fast and robust stream cipher and it is trusted by many organizations, a number of researchers claimed that RC4 has some weakness and bias in its internal states. To increase its security, some guidelines recommended discarding some initial bytes like N, 2N or more from the RC4 key-stream (N is 256, generally). In this paper, the authors tried to find out the optimum number of bytes that is to be discarded to have a more secured RC4, by analyzing some variants of it. All the algorithms, including the original one, are analyzed by the NIST Statistical Test Suite and it has been found that it is not necessary discarding more and more number of bytes to increase the security of RC4.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2015 Third International Conference on Computer, Communication, Control and Information Technology (C3IT)\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2015 Third International Conference on Computer, Communication, Control and Information Technology (C3IT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/C3IT.2015.7060139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2015 Third International Conference on Computer, Communication, Control and Information Technology (C3IT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/C3IT.2015.7060139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管RC4已经证明了自己是一种简单、快速和健壮的流密码,并且受到许多组织的信任,但许多研究人员声称RC4在其内部状态中存在一些弱点和偏见。为了提高它的安全性,一些指导方针建议丢弃一些初始字节,比如RC4密钥流中的N、2N或更多字节(N通常是256)。在本文中,作者试图通过分析RC4的一些变体来找出要丢弃的最佳字节数,以获得更安全的RC4。通过NIST统计测试套件对包括原始算法在内的所有算法进行了分析,发现没有必要丢弃越来越多的字节来提高RC4的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An approach to assess the optimality of refining RC4
Though RC4 has proved itself as a simple, fast and robust stream cipher and it is trusted by many organizations, a number of researchers claimed that RC4 has some weakness and bias in its internal states. To increase its security, some guidelines recommended discarding some initial bytes like N, 2N or more from the RC4 key-stream (N is 256, generally). In this paper, the authors tried to find out the optimum number of bytes that is to be discarded to have a more secured RC4, by analyzing some variants of it. All the algorithms, including the original one, are analyzed by the NIST Statistical Test Suite and it has been found that it is not necessary discarding more and more number of bytes to increase the security of RC4.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信