在少于多数的情况下确定控制权的案例:一步一步的审查,以确定是否保留权力

Ji-Young Kim, M. Oh
{"title":"在少于多数的情况下确定控制权的案例:一步一步的审查,以确定是否保留权力","authors":"Ji-Young Kim, M. Oh","doi":"10.32599/apjb.14.1.202303.313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine the process of determining control in a situation where investors hold less than a majority of the voting rights of the investee through case. \nDesign/methodology/approach - In this study, the various and complex considerations presented in K-IFRS 1110 ‘Consolidated Financial Statements’ were systematically classified and stratified. \nFindings - First, the agreement to delegate voting rights does not necessarily have to be documented, but it can be said to be substantive rights right only if it is not of the nature that one party can discontinue at any time. Second, if it is clear that investors do not have power due to the relative size of voting rights and the degree of stock dispersion, there is no need to review the past shareholders' meeting resolutions and additional facts and circumstances. \nResearch implications or Originality - This study expects to minimize errors in applying the standards by classifying and stratifying the various considerations presented in K-IFRS 1110 into first and subsequent considerations. In addition, it is expected to contribute to reducing practical confusion in determining control by presenting a step-by-step review through case on whether or not to have power to judge control when holding voting rights of less than a majority.","PeriodicalId":310482,"journal":{"name":"The Institute of Management and Economy Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Case of Determining Control when Holding Voting Rights of Less Than a Majority: A Step-by-step Review to Determine whether the Power is Retained\",\"authors\":\"Ji-Young Kim, M. Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.32599/apjb.14.1.202303.313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine the process of determining control in a situation where investors hold less than a majority of the voting rights of the investee through case. \\nDesign/methodology/approach - In this study, the various and complex considerations presented in K-IFRS 1110 ‘Consolidated Financial Statements’ were systematically classified and stratified. \\nFindings - First, the agreement to delegate voting rights does not necessarily have to be documented, but it can be said to be substantive rights right only if it is not of the nature that one party can discontinue at any time. Second, if it is clear that investors do not have power due to the relative size of voting rights and the degree of stock dispersion, there is no need to review the past shareholders' meeting resolutions and additional facts and circumstances. \\nResearch implications or Originality - This study expects to minimize errors in applying the standards by classifying and stratifying the various considerations presented in K-IFRS 1110 into first and subsequent considerations. In addition, it is expected to contribute to reducing practical confusion in determining control by presenting a step-by-step review through case on whether or not to have power to judge control when holding voting rights of less than a majority.\",\"PeriodicalId\":310482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Institute of Management and Economy Research\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Institute of Management and Economy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32599/apjb.14.1.202303.313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Institute of Management and Economy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32599/apjb.14.1.202303.313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的-本研究的目的是通过案例研究在投资者持有少于被投资方多数表决权的情况下确定控制权的过程。设计/方法/方法-在本研究中,K-IFRS 1110“合并财务报表”中提出的各种复杂考虑因素被系统地分类和分层。调查结果-首先,委托表决权的协议不一定要有文件,但只有当它不具有一方可以随时终止的性质时,它才可以说是实质性权利。第二,如果由于表决权的相对规模和股票分散程度,明确投资者没有权力,则不需要审查过去的股东大会决议和其他事实和情况。研究影响或原创性-本研究希望通过将K-IFRS 1110中提出的各种考虑因素分为第一考虑因素和后续考虑因素进行分类和分层,从而最大限度地减少应用准则时的错误。此外,还将通过对在拥有少于过半数的表决权的情况下是否具有判断控制权的权力的事例,逐步进行审查,预计将有助于减少在确定控制权方面的实际混乱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Case of Determining Control when Holding Voting Rights of Less Than a Majority: A Step-by-step Review to Determine whether the Power is Retained
Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine the process of determining control in a situation where investors hold less than a majority of the voting rights of the investee through case. Design/methodology/approach - In this study, the various and complex considerations presented in K-IFRS 1110 ‘Consolidated Financial Statements’ were systematically classified and stratified. Findings - First, the agreement to delegate voting rights does not necessarily have to be documented, but it can be said to be substantive rights right only if it is not of the nature that one party can discontinue at any time. Second, if it is clear that investors do not have power due to the relative size of voting rights and the degree of stock dispersion, there is no need to review the past shareholders' meeting resolutions and additional facts and circumstances. Research implications or Originality - This study expects to minimize errors in applying the standards by classifying and stratifying the various considerations presented in K-IFRS 1110 into first and subsequent considerations. In addition, it is expected to contribute to reducing practical confusion in determining control by presenting a step-by-step review through case on whether or not to have power to judge control when holding voting rights of less than a majority.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信