公立中学教师能力评估:奈及利亚卡拉巴区学生改善表现的灵丹妙药

Okon Abigail Edem, Okon Celestina Edem
{"title":"公立中学教师能力评估:奈及利亚卡拉巴区学生改善表现的灵丹妙药","authors":"Okon Abigail Edem, Okon Celestina Edem","doi":"10.4314/gjedr.v22i1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study examined teachers’ competence in evaluating students’ learning outputs.  It was a descriptive survey design whose area of coverage was 2021/2022 school year in public secondary schools across Calabar Education Zone of Cross River State, Nigeria.   Four out of seven Local Government Areas, 20 out of 100 secondary schools and 496 out of 1,502 teachers (evaluators) formed the sample of the study.  Each teacher had one student to examine on; punctuality, obedience, self-control and honesty (Affective Domains); the evaluation methods considered were formative and summative evaluation.  The sampling methods adopted were purposive, simple random and systematic sampling methods.   Two sets of questionnaire were used for data collection in addition to students’ result sheets (first term junior secondary school two (JSS 2) and teaching staff disposition (teachers’ register).   The two sets of questionnaire were Teachers’ Competence Evaluation Questionnaire (TCEQ) and Teachers’ Score on Students’ Affective Domain Questionnaire (TSSADQ).  The questionnaire instruments were validated by experts in different areas of research affected.    The results obtained from the test-retest pilot study were correlated using Pearson Product Moment Correlation to obtain the internal consistency of the measures whose coefficient was 0.76.  Data collected were analyzed using contingency chi-square technique to test the formulated null hypotheses.  It was found that evaluation methods influence students’ learning outputs and that the quality of teacher competence evaluation also influence students’ affective domain.  It was recommended that teachers should intermittently evaluate students learning in the course of instruction and not forgetting the final evaluation. Also, teachers should improve their evaluation strategies by making learning a life-long affair.","PeriodicalId":197960,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Educational Research","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competence evaluation by public secondary school teachers: a panacea for students improved performance in calabar zone, nigeria\",\"authors\":\"Okon Abigail Edem, Okon Celestina Edem\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/gjedr.v22i1.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study examined teachers’ competence in evaluating students’ learning outputs.  It was a descriptive survey design whose area of coverage was 2021/2022 school year in public secondary schools across Calabar Education Zone of Cross River State, Nigeria.   Four out of seven Local Government Areas, 20 out of 100 secondary schools and 496 out of 1,502 teachers (evaluators) formed the sample of the study.  Each teacher had one student to examine on; punctuality, obedience, self-control and honesty (Affective Domains); the evaluation methods considered were formative and summative evaluation.  The sampling methods adopted were purposive, simple random and systematic sampling methods.   Two sets of questionnaire were used for data collection in addition to students’ result sheets (first term junior secondary school two (JSS 2) and teaching staff disposition (teachers’ register).   The two sets of questionnaire were Teachers’ Competence Evaluation Questionnaire (TCEQ) and Teachers’ Score on Students’ Affective Domain Questionnaire (TSSADQ).  The questionnaire instruments were validated by experts in different areas of research affected.    The results obtained from the test-retest pilot study were correlated using Pearson Product Moment Correlation to obtain the internal consistency of the measures whose coefficient was 0.76.  Data collected were analyzed using contingency chi-square technique to test the formulated null hypotheses.  It was found that evaluation methods influence students’ learning outputs and that the quality of teacher competence evaluation also influence students’ affective domain.  It was recommended that teachers should intermittently evaluate students learning in the course of instruction and not forgetting the final evaluation. Also, teachers should improve their evaluation strategies by making learning a life-long affair.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Journal of Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Journal of Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v22i1.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v22i1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察教师评价学生学习成果的能力。这是一项描述性调查设计,其覆盖区域为尼日利亚克罗斯河州卡拉巴尔教育区的公立中学2021/2022学年。调查对象是7个地方自治团体中的4个、100所中学中的20所、1502名教师(评价员)中的496名。每个老师都有一个学生要检查;守时、服从、自我控制和诚实(情感领域);考虑的评价方法有形成性评价和总结性评价。抽样方法采用有目的、简单随机、系统抽样的方法。除了学生成绩表(第一学期初中二年级(jss2))和教师配置表(教师名册)外,数据收集还使用了两套问卷。两套问卷分别是教师能力评价问卷(TCEQ)和教师学生情感领域问卷(TSSADQ)。问卷工具由不同研究领域的专家进行验证。采用Pearson积矩相关法对重测先导研究结果进行相关性分析,得到测度的内部一致性,其系数为0.76。收集的数据使用偶然性卡方技术进行分析,以检验制定的零假设。研究发现,评价方法影响学生的学习输出,教师能力评价的质量也影响学生的情感域。建议教师在教学过程中间歇性地评价学生的学习情况,不要忘记最后的评价。此外,教师应该改进他们的评价策略,使学习成为终身的事情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Competence evaluation by public secondary school teachers: a panacea for students improved performance in calabar zone, nigeria
The study examined teachers’ competence in evaluating students’ learning outputs.  It was a descriptive survey design whose area of coverage was 2021/2022 school year in public secondary schools across Calabar Education Zone of Cross River State, Nigeria.   Four out of seven Local Government Areas, 20 out of 100 secondary schools and 496 out of 1,502 teachers (evaluators) formed the sample of the study.  Each teacher had one student to examine on; punctuality, obedience, self-control and honesty (Affective Domains); the evaluation methods considered were formative and summative evaluation.  The sampling methods adopted were purposive, simple random and systematic sampling methods.   Two sets of questionnaire were used for data collection in addition to students’ result sheets (first term junior secondary school two (JSS 2) and teaching staff disposition (teachers’ register).   The two sets of questionnaire were Teachers’ Competence Evaluation Questionnaire (TCEQ) and Teachers’ Score on Students’ Affective Domain Questionnaire (TSSADQ).  The questionnaire instruments were validated by experts in different areas of research affected.    The results obtained from the test-retest pilot study were correlated using Pearson Product Moment Correlation to obtain the internal consistency of the measures whose coefficient was 0.76.  Data collected were analyzed using contingency chi-square technique to test the formulated null hypotheses.  It was found that evaluation methods influence students’ learning outputs and that the quality of teacher competence evaluation also influence students’ affective domain.  It was recommended that teachers should intermittently evaluate students learning in the course of instruction and not forgetting the final evaluation. Also, teachers should improve their evaluation strategies by making learning a life-long affair.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信