考虑连续降雨事件的溃坝模拟研究

S. Shin, J. Lim, Kyunghun Kim, H. Kim
{"title":"考虑连续降雨事件的溃坝模拟研究","authors":"S. Shin, J. Lim, Kyunghun Kim, H. Kim","doi":"10.9798/kosham.2023.23.4.207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, flood damage resulting from continuous rainfall events has been on the rise. However, existing Emergency Action Plans (EAPs) addressing reservoir or dam failure only consider Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP), which represents a single rainfall event. This study aims to address this limitation by simulating a dam break scenario caused by continuous rainfall events. The Chungju dam watershed was selected as the study area and a mega rainfall event scenario, involving continuous 500-year frequency rainfall intensity events, was defined. Next, the flood discharge resulting from the mega rainfall event scenario was estimated using the Consecutive Storm Event Based (ConSEB) model. The Simplified Dam Break (SMPDBK) model was employed to simulate the dam break. The flood discharge estimated for this scenario amounted to 31,080.34 cms, which is about 1.2 times larger than the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF). The dam break water level simulated by the SMPDBK model was 150 m and the flood damage area was estimated to be 307.45 km2. Based on the results of the study, we highlighted the need to consider continuous rainfall events within EAPs.","PeriodicalId":416980,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study on Dam Break Simulation considering Continuous Rainfall Events\",\"authors\":\"S. Shin, J. Lim, Kyunghun Kim, H. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.9798/kosham.2023.23.4.207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, flood damage resulting from continuous rainfall events has been on the rise. However, existing Emergency Action Plans (EAPs) addressing reservoir or dam failure only consider Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP), which represents a single rainfall event. This study aims to address this limitation by simulating a dam break scenario caused by continuous rainfall events. The Chungju dam watershed was selected as the study area and a mega rainfall event scenario, involving continuous 500-year frequency rainfall intensity events, was defined. Next, the flood discharge resulting from the mega rainfall event scenario was estimated using the Consecutive Storm Event Based (ConSEB) model. The Simplified Dam Break (SMPDBK) model was employed to simulate the dam break. The flood discharge estimated for this scenario amounted to 31,080.34 cms, which is about 1.2 times larger than the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF). The dam break water level simulated by the SMPDBK model was 150 m and the flood damage area was estimated to be 307.45 km2. Based on the results of the study, we highlighted the need to consider continuous rainfall events within EAPs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9798/kosham.2023.23.4.207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9798/kosham.2023.23.4.207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近年来,连续降雨事件造成的洪涝灾害呈上升趋势。然而,现有的应急行动计划(eap)处理水库或大坝的失败只考虑可能的最大降水(PMP),它代表一次降雨事件。本研究旨在通过模拟由连续降雨事件引起的溃坝情景来解决这一限制。以忠州坝流域为研究区域,定义了连续500年发生一次的特大降雨事件情景。其次,使用基于连续风暴事件(ConSEB)模型估计特大降雨事件情景导致的洪水流量。采用简化溃坝模型(SMPDBK)进行溃坝模拟。在这种情况下,估计的洪水流量为31,080.34厘米,约为可能最大洪水(PMF)的1.2倍。SMPDBK模型模拟的溃坝水位为150 m,洪水破坏面积为307.45 km2。根据研究结果,我们强调需要考虑eap内的连续降雨事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Study on Dam Break Simulation considering Continuous Rainfall Events
In recent years, flood damage resulting from continuous rainfall events has been on the rise. However, existing Emergency Action Plans (EAPs) addressing reservoir or dam failure only consider Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP), which represents a single rainfall event. This study aims to address this limitation by simulating a dam break scenario caused by continuous rainfall events. The Chungju dam watershed was selected as the study area and a mega rainfall event scenario, involving continuous 500-year frequency rainfall intensity events, was defined. Next, the flood discharge resulting from the mega rainfall event scenario was estimated using the Consecutive Storm Event Based (ConSEB) model. The Simplified Dam Break (SMPDBK) model was employed to simulate the dam break. The flood discharge estimated for this scenario amounted to 31,080.34 cms, which is about 1.2 times larger than the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF). The dam break water level simulated by the SMPDBK model was 150 m and the flood damage area was estimated to be 307.45 km2. Based on the results of the study, we highlighted the need to consider continuous rainfall events within EAPs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信