[在杀人案中穿刺中央静脉]。

Beitrage zur gerichtlichen Medizin Pub Date : 1992-01-01
K S Saternus, J H Blank, H Maxeiner
{"title":"[在杀人案中穿刺中央静脉]。","authors":"K S Saternus,&nbsp;J H Blank,&nbsp;H Maxeiner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Puncture of a major cervical veins for insertion of a central venous catheter is a standard-method in resuscitation performed in emergency conditions. Even extensive lesion-marks due to punction are customarily seen by medico-legal practitioners, but in detail they may cause difficulties in differential diagnosis, when lesion marks caused by acts of violence directed straight against the neck are to be differentiated. Especially in the primary phase of inquiry about crimes of homicide these injuries due to punction are forensically important. Therefore frequency and methods of resuscitation efforts were evaluated in 453 crimes of homicide, committed in Göttingen and Berlin (subjects given by the Free University). Findings of the present study were that resuscitation measures were taken merely to a rate of 25%, and in proceeding a central venous catheter was not obligatorily inserted, moreover proceeding being regionally different. In Berlin a central venous catheter was inserted in 17 cases out of 77 resuscitated homicidal injuries, the rate being 24 cases out of 36 cases in Göttingen. In altogether 8 crimes of homicide committed by immediate attacks against the neck, a cervical vena was punctured, findings later being extensive effusions of blood marked around the tapped spot. The different ways to perform resuscitation may justify to point also at the forensic interest to discover the facts together with complete diagnosis in cases of crimes of homicide. That is why it may be vindicated to try to find out a proceeding, which does not lessen the effectiveness of resuscitative manoeuvres, yet by means of which forensical concerns are taken into consideration, too.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":75580,"journal":{"name":"Beitrage zur gerichtlichen Medizin","volume":"50 ","pages":"289-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Puncture of central veins in homicide cases].\",\"authors\":\"K S Saternus,&nbsp;J H Blank,&nbsp;H Maxeiner\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Puncture of a major cervical veins for insertion of a central venous catheter is a standard-method in resuscitation performed in emergency conditions. Even extensive lesion-marks due to punction are customarily seen by medico-legal practitioners, but in detail they may cause difficulties in differential diagnosis, when lesion marks caused by acts of violence directed straight against the neck are to be differentiated. Especially in the primary phase of inquiry about crimes of homicide these injuries due to punction are forensically important. Therefore frequency and methods of resuscitation efforts were evaluated in 453 crimes of homicide, committed in Göttingen and Berlin (subjects given by the Free University). Findings of the present study were that resuscitation measures were taken merely to a rate of 25%, and in proceeding a central venous catheter was not obligatorily inserted, moreover proceeding being regionally different. In Berlin a central venous catheter was inserted in 17 cases out of 77 resuscitated homicidal injuries, the rate being 24 cases out of 36 cases in Göttingen. In altogether 8 crimes of homicide committed by immediate attacks against the neck, a cervical vena was punctured, findings later being extensive effusions of blood marked around the tapped spot. The different ways to perform resuscitation may justify to point also at the forensic interest to discover the facts together with complete diagnosis in cases of crimes of homicide. That is why it may be vindicated to try to find out a proceeding, which does not lessen the effectiveness of resuscitative manoeuvres, yet by means of which forensical concerns are taken into consideration, too.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Beitrage zur gerichtlichen Medizin\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"289-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Beitrage zur gerichtlichen Medizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beitrage zur gerichtlichen Medizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在紧急情况下,穿刺颈大静脉插入中心静脉导管是一种标准的复苏方法。即使是由穿刺造成的广泛的损伤痕迹通常也会被法医学从业人员看到,但当要区分由直接对颈部的暴力行为造成的损伤痕迹时,这些损伤痕迹的细节可能会给鉴别诊断带来困难。特别是在杀人罪侦查的初级阶段,这些刺伤具有重要的法医学意义。因此,在Göttingen和柏林(由自由大学提供的科目)犯下的453起杀人案中,对复苏工作的频率和方法进行了评估。本研究的结果是,采取复苏措施的比率仅为25%,并且在进行中没有强制插入中心静脉导管,而且进行的区域不同。在柏林,77例复苏的杀人案伤者中有17例插入了中心静脉导管,在Göttingen的36例中有24例插入了中心静脉导管。在总共8起直接袭击颈部的杀人案中,颈部静脉被刺穿,后来发现在被刺穿的部位周围有大量的积液。实施复苏的不同方法也可以证明在杀人罪案件中发现事实和完整诊断的法医兴趣。这就是为什么试图找到一种程序是正确的,这种程序既不会降低复苏措施的有效性,又会考虑到法医方面的问题。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Puncture of central veins in homicide cases].

Puncture of a major cervical veins for insertion of a central venous catheter is a standard-method in resuscitation performed in emergency conditions. Even extensive lesion-marks due to punction are customarily seen by medico-legal practitioners, but in detail they may cause difficulties in differential diagnosis, when lesion marks caused by acts of violence directed straight against the neck are to be differentiated. Especially in the primary phase of inquiry about crimes of homicide these injuries due to punction are forensically important. Therefore frequency and methods of resuscitation efforts were evaluated in 453 crimes of homicide, committed in Göttingen and Berlin (subjects given by the Free University). Findings of the present study were that resuscitation measures were taken merely to a rate of 25%, and in proceeding a central venous catheter was not obligatorily inserted, moreover proceeding being regionally different. In Berlin a central venous catheter was inserted in 17 cases out of 77 resuscitated homicidal injuries, the rate being 24 cases out of 36 cases in Göttingen. In altogether 8 crimes of homicide committed by immediate attacks against the neck, a cervical vena was punctured, findings later being extensive effusions of blood marked around the tapped spot. The different ways to perform resuscitation may justify to point also at the forensic interest to discover the facts together with complete diagnosis in cases of crimes of homicide. That is why it may be vindicated to try to find out a proceeding, which does not lessen the effectiveness of resuscitative manoeuvres, yet by means of which forensical concerns are taken into consideration, too.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信