M. Mahmud, S. Monir, T. Khan, M.A.R. Mustafa, H. Sarwar
{"title":"比较无线网络参数下FLV和MPEG4 (H.264/AVC)多媒体文件格式","authors":"M. Mahmud, S. Monir, T. Khan, M.A.R. Mustafa, H. Sarwar","doi":"10.1109/ICCITECHN.2008.4803037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accommodating multimedia resources in the wireless media is a long cherished service. In this paper, we compared the FLV and MPEG4 (H.264/AVC) format of multimedia content using frame rates, sizes and byte rates. Thus we showed that MPEG4 performs better than FLV.","PeriodicalId":335795,"journal":{"name":"2008 11th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing FLV and MPEG4 (H.264/AVC) multimedia file format with wireless network parameters\",\"authors\":\"M. Mahmud, S. Monir, T. Khan, M.A.R. Mustafa, H. Sarwar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCITECHN.2008.4803037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accommodating multimedia resources in the wireless media is a long cherished service. In this paper, we compared the FLV and MPEG4 (H.264/AVC) format of multimedia content using frame rates, sizes and byte rates. Thus we showed that MPEG4 performs better than FLV.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 11th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 11th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCITECHN.2008.4803037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 11th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCITECHN.2008.4803037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing FLV and MPEG4 (H.264/AVC) multimedia file format with wireless network parameters
Accommodating multimedia resources in the wireless media is a long cherished service. In this paper, we compared the FLV and MPEG4 (H.264/AVC) format of multimedia content using frame rates, sizes and byte rates. Thus we showed that MPEG4 performs better than FLV.