全纳教育评估工具(IEAT)信度和效度的验证

Changwan Han, Natsuki Yano
{"title":"全纳教育评估工具(IEAT)信度和效度的验证","authors":"Changwan Han, Natsuki Yano","doi":"10.14391/AJHS.9.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Han, Yano & Yonemizu (2015) also developed the Inclusive Education Assessment Tool(IEAT) to understand the establishment of inclusive education system. This tool was developed based on the understanding of the current state of inclusive education and the relationship between inclusive education and special needs education in Japan. IEAT is the first tool to evaluate the current state of inclusive education system, but its reliability and validity have not been verified yet. Therefore, this study aimed to verify the reliability, content validity and construct validity of IEAT. Content Validity; When over 80 percent of the respondents answered that the tool is valid, it is determined that this tool is verified to be valid. Reliability; Reliability of IEAT was estimated using the internal consistency method. The internal consistency of IEAT was assessed with Cronbach’s α. A minimum Cronbach’s α co-efficient of 0.7 was considered satisfactory for group-level comparisons. Construct Validity; Construct validity was verified using structural equation modeling (SEM). Goodness of fit index (GFI), comparative fit index (CFI) and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) are the suitability indices of SEM; researchers may choose which index they would use for the verification of SEM. A model is considered acceptable, when two or more fit indices are met including RMSEA. For adequately fitting models, these fit indices should meet the following criteria: GFI>0.95, CFI>0.90 and RMSEA<0.1. As the result, Over 90 percents of respondents answered that this tool is valid in all the items and domains, guarantee of rights(α=0.848), improvement in environment(α=0.752) and reform in curriculum(α=0.775); GFI=0.953; CFI=0.952; and RMSEA=0.068. The validity was verified because the values of GFI, CFI and RMSEA were within the goodness-of-fit range. Inclusive education, IEAT, Verification of the Reliability and Validity, Changwan HAN (hancw917@gmail.com) Asian J Human Services, 2015, 9:63-72. © 2015 Asian Society of Human Services Received","PeriodicalId":370734,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of human services","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Verification of the Reliability and Validity of Inclusive Education Assessment Tool (IEAT)\",\"authors\":\"Changwan Han, Natsuki Yano\",\"doi\":\"10.14391/AJHS.9.63\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Han, Yano & Yonemizu (2015) also developed the Inclusive Education Assessment Tool(IEAT) to understand the establishment of inclusive education system. This tool was developed based on the understanding of the current state of inclusive education and the relationship between inclusive education and special needs education in Japan. IEAT is the first tool to evaluate the current state of inclusive education system, but its reliability and validity have not been verified yet. Therefore, this study aimed to verify the reliability, content validity and construct validity of IEAT. Content Validity; When over 80 percent of the respondents answered that the tool is valid, it is determined that this tool is verified to be valid. Reliability; Reliability of IEAT was estimated using the internal consistency method. The internal consistency of IEAT was assessed with Cronbach’s α. A minimum Cronbach’s α co-efficient of 0.7 was considered satisfactory for group-level comparisons. Construct Validity; Construct validity was verified using structural equation modeling (SEM). Goodness of fit index (GFI), comparative fit index (CFI) and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) are the suitability indices of SEM; researchers may choose which index they would use for the verification of SEM. A model is considered acceptable, when two or more fit indices are met including RMSEA. For adequately fitting models, these fit indices should meet the following criteria: GFI>0.95, CFI>0.90 and RMSEA<0.1. As the result, Over 90 percents of respondents answered that this tool is valid in all the items and domains, guarantee of rights(α=0.848), improvement in environment(α=0.752) and reform in curriculum(α=0.775); GFI=0.953; CFI=0.952; and RMSEA=0.068. The validity was verified because the values of GFI, CFI and RMSEA were within the goodness-of-fit range. Inclusive education, IEAT, Verification of the Reliability and Validity, Changwan HAN (hancw917@gmail.com) Asian J Human Services, 2015, 9:63-72. © 2015 Asian Society of Human Services Received\",\"PeriodicalId\":370734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of human services\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of human services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14391/AJHS.9.63\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of human services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14391/AJHS.9.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Han, Yano & Yonemizu(2015)还开发了全纳教育评估工具(IEAT)来理解全纳教育体系的建立。该工具是基于对日本全纳教育现状的理解以及全纳教育与特殊需要教育的关系而开发的。IEAT是第一个评估全纳教育体系现状的工具,但其信度和效度尚未得到验证。因此,本研究旨在验证IEAT的信度、内容效度和结构效度。内容效度;当超过80%的受访者回答该工具有效时,就确定该工具已被验证为有效。可靠性;采用内一致性法对IEAT的信度进行了估计。采用Cronbach’s α评价IEAT的内部一致性。最小Cronbach 's α系数为0.7被认为是令人满意的组水平比较。建构效度;采用结构方程模型(SEM)验证结构效度。拟合优度指数(GFI)、比较拟合指数(CFI)和近似均方根误差(RMSEA)是SEM的适宜性指标;研究人员可以选择他们将使用哪个索引来验证扫描电镜。当包括RMSEA在内的两个或多个拟合指标得到满足时,该模型被认为是可接受的。为了充分拟合模型,这些拟合指标应满足以下条件:GFI>0.95, CFI>0.90, RMSEA<0.1。结果,90%以上的人回答说:“在权利保障(α=0.848)、环境改善(α=0.752)、课程改革(α=0.775)等所有项目和领域都是有效的。”GFI = 0.953;CFI = 0.952;和RMSEA = 0.068。GFI、CFI和RMSEA值均在拟合优度范围内,验证了有效性。全纳教育,IEAT,信度与效度验证,韩长万(hancw917@gmail.com)亚洲人文服务学报,2015,9:63-72。©2015亚洲人类服务协会收到
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Verification of the Reliability and Validity of Inclusive Education Assessment Tool (IEAT)
Han, Yano & Yonemizu (2015) also developed the Inclusive Education Assessment Tool(IEAT) to understand the establishment of inclusive education system. This tool was developed based on the understanding of the current state of inclusive education and the relationship between inclusive education and special needs education in Japan. IEAT is the first tool to evaluate the current state of inclusive education system, but its reliability and validity have not been verified yet. Therefore, this study aimed to verify the reliability, content validity and construct validity of IEAT. Content Validity; When over 80 percent of the respondents answered that the tool is valid, it is determined that this tool is verified to be valid. Reliability; Reliability of IEAT was estimated using the internal consistency method. The internal consistency of IEAT was assessed with Cronbach’s α. A minimum Cronbach’s α co-efficient of 0.7 was considered satisfactory for group-level comparisons. Construct Validity; Construct validity was verified using structural equation modeling (SEM). Goodness of fit index (GFI), comparative fit index (CFI) and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) are the suitability indices of SEM; researchers may choose which index they would use for the verification of SEM. A model is considered acceptable, when two or more fit indices are met including RMSEA. For adequately fitting models, these fit indices should meet the following criteria: GFI>0.95, CFI>0.90 and RMSEA<0.1. As the result, Over 90 percents of respondents answered that this tool is valid in all the items and domains, guarantee of rights(α=0.848), improvement in environment(α=0.752) and reform in curriculum(α=0.775); GFI=0.953; CFI=0.952; and RMSEA=0.068. The validity was verified because the values of GFI, CFI and RMSEA were within the goodness-of-fit range. Inclusive education, IEAT, Verification of the Reliability and Validity, Changwan HAN (hancw917@gmail.com) Asian J Human Services, 2015, 9:63-72. © 2015 Asian Society of Human Services Received
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信