第十七章我认为你对家庭和工作的看法:多元无知和理想工人规范

Christin L. Munsch, L. O'Connor
{"title":"第十七章我认为你对家庭和工作的看法:多元无知和理想工人规范","authors":"Christin L. Munsch, L. O'Connor","doi":"10.1108/S1530-353520180000013019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThe ideal worker norm refers to the belief that employees can and should be singularly devoted to work. Our purpose is to understand the extent to which workers buy into various components of ideal work and how unpopular components of the ideal worker norm persist. We hypothesize they persist, at least in part, because of pluralistic ignorance. Pluralistic ignorance entails situations in which most people privately reject a norm, but incorrectly assume others accept it. \n \nDrawing on original survey data, we examine the extent to which US workers subscribe to a range of factors described in the ideal work literature. We test the pluralistic ignorance hypothesis by comparing workers’ agreement with, and their perceptions of their coworkers’ agreement with, these factors. \n \nWe find workers embrace some components of ideal work. Yet, regardless of gender or parental status, they dislike those components that involve working extremely long hours and prioritizing work at the expense of personal or family life. In addition, regardless of gender or parental status, workers experience pluralistic ignorance with respect to those components that involve prioritizing work at the expense of personal or family life. \n \nOur findings suggest that researchers distinguish between different components of ideal work. They also suggest that everyone – not just women or parents – desire work–family balance. Lastly, because people often behave in ways that are congruent with what they mistakenly believe to be the norm, our findings suggest workers may unintentionally perpetuate family-unfriendly workplace standards.","PeriodicalId":217936,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapter 17 What I Think You Think about Family and Work: Pluralistic Ignorance and the Ideal Worker Norm\",\"authors\":\"Christin L. Munsch, L. O'Connor\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/S1530-353520180000013019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\nThe ideal worker norm refers to the belief that employees can and should be singularly devoted to work. Our purpose is to understand the extent to which workers buy into various components of ideal work and how unpopular components of the ideal worker norm persist. We hypothesize they persist, at least in part, because of pluralistic ignorance. Pluralistic ignorance entails situations in which most people privately reject a norm, but incorrectly assume others accept it. \\n \\nDrawing on original survey data, we examine the extent to which US workers subscribe to a range of factors described in the ideal work literature. We test the pluralistic ignorance hypothesis by comparing workers’ agreement with, and their perceptions of their coworkers’ agreement with, these factors. \\n \\nWe find workers embrace some components of ideal work. Yet, regardless of gender or parental status, they dislike those components that involve working extremely long hours and prioritizing work at the expense of personal or family life. In addition, regardless of gender or parental status, workers experience pluralistic ignorance with respect to those components that involve prioritizing work at the expense of personal or family life. \\n \\nOur findings suggest that researchers distinguish between different components of ideal work. They also suggest that everyone – not just women or parents – desire work–family balance. Lastly, because people often behave in ways that are congruent with what they mistakenly believe to be the norm, our findings suggest workers may unintentionally perpetuate family-unfriendly workplace standards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":217936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1530-353520180000013019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1530-353520180000013019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

理想员工规范是指认为员工能够而且应该全身心投入工作的信念。我们的目的是了解工人在多大程度上接受理想工作的各种组成部分,以及理想工人规范中不受欢迎的组成部分是如何持续存在的。我们假设,它们之所以持续存在,至少在一定程度上是因为多元无知。多元无知导致这样的情况:大多数人私下拒绝某种规范,但错误地认为其他人接受它。根据原始调查数据,我们研究了美国工人在多大程度上认同理想工作文献中描述的一系列因素。我们通过比较员工对这些因素的认同,以及他们对同事对这些因素的认同的看法,来检验多元无知假说。我们发现工人们接受了理想工作的某些组成部分。然而,无论性别或父母身份如何,他们都不喜欢那些工作时间超长、以牺牲个人或家庭生活为代价优先考虑工作的工作。此外,无论性别或父母身份如何,员工对那些以牺牲个人或家庭生活为代价优先考虑工作的组成部分都有多元化的无知。我们的研究结果表明,研究人员区分了理想工作的不同组成部分。研究还表明,每个人——不仅仅是女性或父母——都渴望工作与家庭的平衡。最后,由于人们的行为方式往往与他们错误地认为是规范的方式一致,我们的研究结果表明,员工可能无意中延续了对家庭不友好的工作场所标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chapter 17 What I Think You Think about Family and Work: Pluralistic Ignorance and the Ideal Worker Norm
Abstract The ideal worker norm refers to the belief that employees can and should be singularly devoted to work. Our purpose is to understand the extent to which workers buy into various components of ideal work and how unpopular components of the ideal worker norm persist. We hypothesize they persist, at least in part, because of pluralistic ignorance. Pluralistic ignorance entails situations in which most people privately reject a norm, but incorrectly assume others accept it. Drawing on original survey data, we examine the extent to which US workers subscribe to a range of factors described in the ideal work literature. We test the pluralistic ignorance hypothesis by comparing workers’ agreement with, and their perceptions of their coworkers’ agreement with, these factors. We find workers embrace some components of ideal work. Yet, regardless of gender or parental status, they dislike those components that involve working extremely long hours and prioritizing work at the expense of personal or family life. In addition, regardless of gender or parental status, workers experience pluralistic ignorance with respect to those components that involve prioritizing work at the expense of personal or family life. Our findings suggest that researchers distinguish between different components of ideal work. They also suggest that everyone – not just women or parents – desire work–family balance. Lastly, because people often behave in ways that are congruent with what they mistakenly believe to be the norm, our findings suggest workers may unintentionally perpetuate family-unfriendly workplace standards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信