在医学教育文献中应用游戏化的证据质量和教学策略:系统综述

A. Salehi, Hossein Ali Mohammadi, E. Jenabi, E. Khanlarzadeh, Koosha Ashtari
{"title":"在医学教育文献中应用游戏化的证据质量和教学策略:系统综述","authors":"A. Salehi, Hossein Ali Mohammadi, E. Jenabi, E. Khanlarzadeh, Koosha Ashtari","doi":"10.1177/10468781231195903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gamification is the use of game principles in non-game settings such as medical education. Effective evidence for using gamification in medical education needs well-designed studies that describe outcomes related to interventions. The study objective was to systematically review the study designs describing gamification interventions in medical education focusing on their characteristics and medical students’ learning. We systematically searched the databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until 2021. Articles were appraised using the Medical Education Research Quality Instrument (MERSQI). The search result included 423 articles, of which 53 articles had inclusion criteria. Of these, 23 articles were classified in the non-electronic games group and 30 studies in the electronic games group. The quality of evidence in both groups was assessed using the MERSQI average checklist. In total, 90% of studies reported the effectiveness of game intervention in one of the 4 levels of the Kirkpatrick pyramid. The predominant pedagogical approach in both groups was the cognitive approach. The psychomotor approach and the affective approach were more prominent in the electronic and non-electronic games groups, respectively. This study shows that gamification training techniques improve the performance of medical students in most cases.","PeriodicalId":190710,"journal":{"name":"Simulation & Gaming","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Evidence and Pedagogical Strategy in Using Gamification in Medical Education Literature: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"A. Salehi, Hossein Ali Mohammadi, E. Jenabi, E. Khanlarzadeh, Koosha Ashtari\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10468781231195903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gamification is the use of game principles in non-game settings such as medical education. Effective evidence for using gamification in medical education needs well-designed studies that describe outcomes related to interventions. The study objective was to systematically review the study designs describing gamification interventions in medical education focusing on their characteristics and medical students’ learning. We systematically searched the databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until 2021. Articles were appraised using the Medical Education Research Quality Instrument (MERSQI). The search result included 423 articles, of which 53 articles had inclusion criteria. Of these, 23 articles were classified in the non-electronic games group and 30 studies in the electronic games group. The quality of evidence in both groups was assessed using the MERSQI average checklist. In total, 90% of studies reported the effectiveness of game intervention in one of the 4 levels of the Kirkpatrick pyramid. The predominant pedagogical approach in both groups was the cognitive approach. The psychomotor approach and the affective approach were more prominent in the electronic and non-electronic games groups, respectively. This study shows that gamification training techniques improve the performance of medical students in most cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":190710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Simulation & Gaming\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Simulation & Gaming\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781231195903\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation & Gaming","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781231195903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

游戏化是指在非游戏环境中使用游戏原则,如医学教育。在医学教育中使用游戏化的有效证据需要精心设计的研究,描述与干预措施相关的结果。本研究的目的是系统回顾描述游戏化干预在医学教育中的研究设计,重点是它们的特点和医学生的学习。我们系统地检索了数据库,包括Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus和Web of Science,直到2021年。采用医学教育研究质量评价工具(MERSQI)对文章进行评价。检索结果包括423篇文章,其中53篇文章有纳入标准。其中,23篇文章被归类为非电子游戏组,30篇研究被归类为电子游戏组。两组的证据质量均采用MERSQI平均检查表进行评估。总的来说,90%的研究报告了游戏干预在柯克帕特里克金字塔的4个等级中的一个中的有效性。两组的主要教学方法是认知方法。在电子游戏组和非电子游戏组中,精神运动性方法和情感方法分别更为突出。本研究表明,游戏化训练技术在大多数情况下提高医学生的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of Evidence and Pedagogical Strategy in Using Gamification in Medical Education Literature: A Systematic Review
Gamification is the use of game principles in non-game settings such as medical education. Effective evidence for using gamification in medical education needs well-designed studies that describe outcomes related to interventions. The study objective was to systematically review the study designs describing gamification interventions in medical education focusing on their characteristics and medical students’ learning. We systematically searched the databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until 2021. Articles were appraised using the Medical Education Research Quality Instrument (MERSQI). The search result included 423 articles, of which 53 articles had inclusion criteria. Of these, 23 articles were classified in the non-electronic games group and 30 studies in the electronic games group. The quality of evidence in both groups was assessed using the MERSQI average checklist. In total, 90% of studies reported the effectiveness of game intervention in one of the 4 levels of the Kirkpatrick pyramid. The predominant pedagogical approach in both groups was the cognitive approach. The psychomotor approach and the affective approach were more prominent in the electronic and non-electronic games groups, respectively. This study shows that gamification training techniques improve the performance of medical students in most cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信