云存储系统中机密性和客户端加密的开销

Eric Henziger, Niklas Carlsson
{"title":"云存储系统中机密性和客户端加密的开销","authors":"Eric Henziger, Niklas Carlsson","doi":"10.1145/3344341.3368808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Client-side encryption (CSE) is important to ensure that only the intended users have access to information stored in public cloud services. However, CSE complicates file synchronization methods such as deduplication and delta encoding, important to reduce the large network bandwidth overheads associated with cloud storage services. To investigate the overhead penalty associated with CSE, in this paper, we present a comprehensive overhead analysis that includes empirical experiments using four popular CSE services (CSEs) and four popular non-CSEs. Our results show that existing CSEs are able to implement CSE together with bandwidth saving features such as compression and deduplication with low additional overhead compared to the non-CSEs. The most noticeable differences between CSEs and non-CSEs are instead related to whether they implement delta encoding and how effectively such solutions are implemented. In particular, fewer CSEs than non-CSEs implement delta encoding, and the bandwidth saving differences between the applications that implement delta encoding can be substantial.","PeriodicalId":261870,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 12th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Overhead of Confidentiality and Client-side Encryption in Cloud Storage Systems\",\"authors\":\"Eric Henziger, Niklas Carlsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3344341.3368808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Client-side encryption (CSE) is important to ensure that only the intended users have access to information stored in public cloud services. However, CSE complicates file synchronization methods such as deduplication and delta encoding, important to reduce the large network bandwidth overheads associated with cloud storage services. To investigate the overhead penalty associated with CSE, in this paper, we present a comprehensive overhead analysis that includes empirical experiments using four popular CSE services (CSEs) and four popular non-CSEs. Our results show that existing CSEs are able to implement CSE together with bandwidth saving features such as compression and deduplication with low additional overhead compared to the non-CSEs. The most noticeable differences between CSEs and non-CSEs are instead related to whether they implement delta encoding and how effectively such solutions are implemented. In particular, fewer CSEs than non-CSEs implement delta encoding, and the bandwidth saving differences between the applications that implement delta encoding can be substantial.\",\"PeriodicalId\":261870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 12th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 12th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3344341.3368808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 12th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3344341.3368808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

客户端加密(CSE)对于确保只有预期用户才能访问存储在公共云服务中的信息非常重要。但是,CSE使重复数据删除和增量编码等文件同步方法变得复杂,这对于减少与云存储业务相关的大量网络带宽开销非常重要。为了研究与CSE相关的开销损失,在本文中,我们提出了一个全面的开销分析,包括使用四种流行的CSE服务(CSE)和四种流行的非CSE服务的实证实验。我们的结果表明,与非CSE相比,现有的CSE能够将CSE与带宽节省功能(如压缩和重复数据删除)一起实现,并且额外开销较低。cse和非cse之间最显著的区别在于它们是否实现增量编码,以及实现这种解决方案的效率如何。特别是,实现增量编码的cse比不实现增量编码的cse要少,并且实现增量编码的应用程序之间的带宽节省差异可能很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Overhead of Confidentiality and Client-side Encryption in Cloud Storage Systems
Client-side encryption (CSE) is important to ensure that only the intended users have access to information stored in public cloud services. However, CSE complicates file synchronization methods such as deduplication and delta encoding, important to reduce the large network bandwidth overheads associated with cloud storage services. To investigate the overhead penalty associated with CSE, in this paper, we present a comprehensive overhead analysis that includes empirical experiments using four popular CSE services (CSEs) and four popular non-CSEs. Our results show that existing CSEs are able to implement CSE together with bandwidth saving features such as compression and deduplication with low additional overhead compared to the non-CSEs. The most noticeable differences between CSEs and non-CSEs are instead related to whether they implement delta encoding and how effectively such solutions are implemented. In particular, fewer CSEs than non-CSEs implement delta encoding, and the bandwidth saving differences between the applications that implement delta encoding can be substantial.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信