部门政府的行为及其直接政府机制的控制

J. Tealdi
{"title":"部门政府的行为及其直接政府机制的控制","authors":"J. Tealdi","doi":"10.31672/55.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At Local Governments’ level, Uruguay’s Constitution states two mechanisms for direct participation, namely: referendum and popular initiative. Until 2013, the Electoral Board’s case law had denied the existence of such institutes, arguing that they required to be regulated by the lawmaker. Current case law of such Board, however, enshrines the existence of both institutes, although with serious limitations that, to the author’s view, violate the constitutional text, and that are analyzed throughout this paper.","PeriodicalId":440704,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Derecho Público","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LOS ACTOS DE LOS GOBIERNOS DEPARTAMENTALES Y SU CONTROL POR LOS MECANISMOS DE GOBIERNO DIRECTO\",\"authors\":\"J. Tealdi\",\"doi\":\"10.31672/55.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At Local Governments’ level, Uruguay’s Constitution states two mechanisms for direct participation, namely: referendum and popular initiative. Until 2013, the Electoral Board’s case law had denied the existence of such institutes, arguing that they required to be regulated by the lawmaker. Current case law of such Board, however, enshrines the existence of both institutes, although with serious limitations that, to the author’s view, violate the constitutional text, and that are analyzed throughout this paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Derecho Público\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Derecho Público\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31672/55.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Derecho Público","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31672/55.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在地方政府一级,乌拉圭《宪法》规定了两种直接参与机制,即:公民投票和人民倡议。在2013年之前,香港选举委员会的判例法一直否认此类机构的存在,称它们需要由立法会议员监管。然而,这一委员会的现行判例法规定了这两个机构的存在,尽管有严重的限制,作者认为这些限制违反了宪法文本,本文将对此进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LOS ACTOS DE LOS GOBIERNOS DEPARTAMENTALES Y SU CONTROL POR LOS MECANISMOS DE GOBIERNO DIRECTO
At Local Governments’ level, Uruguay’s Constitution states two mechanisms for direct participation, namely: referendum and popular initiative. Until 2013, the Electoral Board’s case law had denied the existence of such institutes, arguing that they required to be regulated by the lawmaker. Current case law of such Board, however, enshrines the existence of both institutes, although with serious limitations that, to the author’s view, violate the constitutional text, and that are analyzed throughout this paper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信