R. Molero, Carlos Fambuena, A. Climent, M. Guillem
{"title":"心房颤动的心电图成像:最佳吉洪诺夫正则化参数的选择","authors":"R. Molero, Carlos Fambuena, A. Climent, M. Guillem","doi":"10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) allows evaluating the complexity of atrial fibrillation (AF) signals using the Boundary Element Method and Tikhonov regularization. An accurate ECGI reconstruction is dependent on a proper selection of the regularization parameter <tex>$(\\lambda)$</tex>. In this work, two ranges of <tex>$\\lambda$</tex> are explored to evaluate the effect of <tex>$\\lambda$</tex> on the quality of the ECGI reconstruction. ECGIs of 20 AF patients were computed using zero (TO), first (T1) and second (T2) order Tikhonov regularization (TR) for two ranges ofv: from 10–<sup>9</sup> to 10<sup>2</sup> and 10–<sup>12</sup> to 10–<sup>4</sup>. Dominant frequencies (DF) and the number of rotors obtained with the two ranges and methods were compared. Zero-order Tikhonov showed to be more robust in <tex>$\\lambda$</tex> selection for different <tex>$\\lambda$</tex> ranges. For lower <tex>$\\lambda$</tex> ranges, higher DF was found <tex>$(T2,\\ p < 0.05)$</tex> and more rotors were detected for T1 and <tex>$T2(p < 0.01)$</tex>. Differences between TR methods compared by <tex>$\\lambda$</tex> ranges showed more variability in derived metrics for lower <tex>$\\lambda$</tex> range <tex>$(p < 0.01)$</tex>. Optimal ranges for <tex>$\\lambda$</tex> search differ among T0, T1 and T2. Election of lower than optimal <tex>$\\lambda$</tex> values result in an increased estimated electrical complexity.","PeriodicalId":126746,"journal":{"name":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrocardiographic Imaging in Atrial Fibrillation: Selection of the Optimal Tikhonov-Regularization Parameter\",\"authors\":\"R. Molero, Carlos Fambuena, A. Climent, M. Guillem\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) allows evaluating the complexity of atrial fibrillation (AF) signals using the Boundary Element Method and Tikhonov regularization. An accurate ECGI reconstruction is dependent on a proper selection of the regularization parameter <tex>$(\\\\lambda)$</tex>. In this work, two ranges of <tex>$\\\\lambda$</tex> are explored to evaluate the effect of <tex>$\\\\lambda$</tex> on the quality of the ECGI reconstruction. ECGIs of 20 AF patients were computed using zero (TO), first (T1) and second (T2) order Tikhonov regularization (TR) for two ranges ofv: from 10–<sup>9</sup> to 10<sup>2</sup> and 10–<sup>12</sup> to 10–<sup>4</sup>. Dominant frequencies (DF) and the number of rotors obtained with the two ranges and methods were compared. Zero-order Tikhonov showed to be more robust in <tex>$\\\\lambda$</tex> selection for different <tex>$\\\\lambda$</tex> ranges. For lower <tex>$\\\\lambda$</tex> ranges, higher DF was found <tex>$(T2,\\\\ p < 0.05)$</tex> and more rotors were detected for T1 and <tex>$T2(p < 0.01)$</tex>. Differences between TR methods compared by <tex>$\\\\lambda$</tex> ranges showed more variability in derived metrics for lower <tex>$\\\\lambda$</tex> range <tex>$(p < 0.01)$</tex>. Optimal ranges for <tex>$\\\\lambda$</tex> search differ among T0, T1 and T2. Election of lower than optimal <tex>$\\\\lambda$</tex> values result in an increased estimated electrical complexity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662918\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Electrocardiographic Imaging in Atrial Fibrillation: Selection of the Optimal Tikhonov-Regularization Parameter
Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) allows evaluating the complexity of atrial fibrillation (AF) signals using the Boundary Element Method and Tikhonov regularization. An accurate ECGI reconstruction is dependent on a proper selection of the regularization parameter $(\lambda)$. In this work, two ranges of $\lambda$ are explored to evaluate the effect of $\lambda$ on the quality of the ECGI reconstruction. ECGIs of 20 AF patients were computed using zero (TO), first (T1) and second (T2) order Tikhonov regularization (TR) for two ranges ofv: from 10–9 to 102 and 10–12 to 10–4. Dominant frequencies (DF) and the number of rotors obtained with the two ranges and methods were compared. Zero-order Tikhonov showed to be more robust in $\lambda$ selection for different $\lambda$ ranges. For lower $\lambda$ ranges, higher DF was found $(T2,\ p < 0.05)$ and more rotors were detected for T1 and $T2(p < 0.01)$. Differences between TR methods compared by $\lambda$ ranges showed more variability in derived metrics for lower $\lambda$ range $(p < 0.01)$. Optimal ranges for $\lambda$ search differ among T0, T1 and T2. Election of lower than optimal $\lambda$ values result in an increased estimated electrical complexity.