CETA中的投资者-国家争端解决:它是黄金标准吗?

International Economic Law eJournal Pub Date : 2016-10-04 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2860319

J. Vanduzer

{"title":"CETA中的投资者-国家争端解决:它是黄金标准吗?","authors":"J. Vanduzer","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2860319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"October 24, 2016 – CETA’s investment dispute provisions have become a lightning rod for critics of the trade pact within Europe, but in its current form, the CETA text represents a significant improvement from past trade and investment deals according to a new report from the C.D. Howe Institute. In “Investor-state Dispute Settlement in CETA: Is it the Gold Standard?,” Tony VanDuzer concludes that CETA provisions address many of the critical objections emanating from within European Union (EU) states.","PeriodicalId":378416,"journal":{"name":"International Economic Law eJournal","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investor-State Dispute Settlement in CETA: Is It the Gold Standard?\",\"authors\":\"J. Vanduzer\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2860319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"October 24, 2016 – CETA’s investment dispute provisions have become a lightning rod for critics of the trade pact within Europe, but in its current form, the CETA text represents a significant improvement from past trade and investment deals according to a new report from the C.D. Howe Institute. In “Investor-state Dispute Settlement in CETA: Is it the Gold Standard?,” Tony VanDuzer concludes that CETA provisions address many of the critical objections emanating from within European Union (EU) states.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Economic Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Economic Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2860319\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Economic Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2860319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

摘要

2016年10月24日—CETA的投资争端条款已成为欧洲内部贸易协定批评者的焦点，但根据C.D. Howe研究所的一份新报告，从目前的形式来看，CETA文本比过去的贸易和投资协议有了重大改进。在“CETA的投资者-国家争端解决:它是黄金标准吗?”Tony VanDuzer的结论是，CETA的条款解决了来自欧盟(EU)国家内部的许多关键异议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Investor-State Dispute Settlement in CETA: Is It the Gold Standard?

October 24, 2016 – CETA’s investment dispute provisions have become a lightning rod for critics of the trade pact within Europe, but in its current form, the CETA text represents a significant improvement from past trade and investment deals according to a new report from the C.D. Howe Institute. In “Investor-state Dispute Settlement in CETA: Is it the Gold Standard?,” Tony VanDuzer concludes that CETA provisions address many of the critical objections emanating from within European Union (EU) states.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Economic Law eJournal

自引率

0.00%

发文量