在线vs.课堂:基于成绩的比较

V. Gondhalekar, Robert Barnett, Susan C. Edwards
{"title":"在线vs.课堂:基于成绩的比较","authors":"V. Gondhalekar, Robert Barnett, Susan C. Edwards","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.497722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study forms two portfolios, online and in-class, each consisting of ninety matched undergraduate classes offered at a university and compares them on the basis of the grade performance of the students. The enrollment in the two portfolios is 1,958 and 2,073 students respectively. It finds that students in the online portfolio get lower grades compared to those in the in-class portfolio. Furthermore, the difference is significant for students with the following characteristics: female, white, closer proximity to campus, and income level. In the two years after portfolio formation, irrespective of the grade performance and other characteristics, a significantly lower proportion of the online students compared to the in-class students take the subsequent course (relative to their portfolio course). Subject to this caveat, the grade performance of students in the subsequent course is not different for the two groups.","PeriodicalId":369795,"journal":{"name":"Writing Technologies eJournal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online vs. In-Class: Comparison Based on Grades\",\"authors\":\"V. Gondhalekar, Robert Barnett, Susan C. Edwards\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.497722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study forms two portfolios, online and in-class, each consisting of ninety matched undergraduate classes offered at a university and compares them on the basis of the grade performance of the students. The enrollment in the two portfolios is 1,958 and 2,073 students respectively. It finds that students in the online portfolio get lower grades compared to those in the in-class portfolio. Furthermore, the difference is significant for students with the following characteristics: female, white, closer proximity to campus, and income level. In the two years after portfolio formation, irrespective of the grade performance and other characteristics, a significantly lower proportion of the online students compared to the in-class students take the subsequent course (relative to their portfolio course). Subject to this caveat, the grade performance of students in the subsequent course is not different for the two groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":369795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Writing Technologies eJournal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Writing Technologies eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.497722\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Writing Technologies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.497722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究形成了在线和课堂两个组合,每个组合由一所大学开设的90个相匹配的本科课程组成,并根据学生的成绩表现对它们进行比较。这两个项目的招生人数分别为1958人和2073人。研究发现,参加在线投资组合的学生比参加课堂投资组合的学生得分低。此外,在女性、白人、离校园较近和收入水平的学生中,差异也很显著。在作品集形成后的两年内,无论成绩表现和其他特征如何,在线学生选择后续课程的比例明显低于课堂学生(相对于他们的作品集课程)。在此前提下,两组学生在后续课程中的成绩表现并无不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Online vs. In-Class: Comparison Based on Grades
This study forms two portfolios, online and in-class, each consisting of ninety matched undergraduate classes offered at a university and compares them on the basis of the grade performance of the students. The enrollment in the two portfolios is 1,958 and 2,073 students respectively. It finds that students in the online portfolio get lower grades compared to those in the in-class portfolio. Furthermore, the difference is significant for students with the following characteristics: female, white, closer proximity to campus, and income level. In the two years after portfolio formation, irrespective of the grade performance and other characteristics, a significantly lower proportion of the online students compared to the in-class students take the subsequent course (relative to their portfolio course). Subject to this caveat, the grade performance of students in the subsequent course is not different for the two groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信