CVA错路风险:使用Quanto CDS基础进行校准

T. Chung, J. Gregory
{"title":"CVA错路风险:使用Quanto CDS基础进行校准","authors":"T. Chung, J. Gregory","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3188793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we discuss the calibration of wrong way risk (WWR) model by using information from the credit default swap (CDS) market. A Quanto CDS provides credit protection against the default of a reference entity but is denominated in a non-domestic currency. The payoff of a Quanto CDS contract therefore reflects the market-implied interaction of FX risk and a credit event. This in turn, defines the cost of hedging WWR for a FX-sensitive portfolio. Our empirical evidence shows that the implied FX jump sizes are significant for a wide range of corporates. For systemic counterparties, the CVA WWR add-on could be 40% higher than the standard case, and choosing a proper jump-at-default WWR model is critical to capture the impact. In contrast, historical correlation gives the incorrect relationship (right-way risk) and cannot calibrate to the market prices in many cases, leading to the mispricing of CVA WWR.","PeriodicalId":293888,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Derivatives eJournal","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CVA Wrong Way Risk: Calibration Using Quanto CDS Basis\",\"authors\":\"T. Chung, J. Gregory\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3188793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we discuss the calibration of wrong way risk (WWR) model by using information from the credit default swap (CDS) market. A Quanto CDS provides credit protection against the default of a reference entity but is denominated in a non-domestic currency. The payoff of a Quanto CDS contract therefore reflects the market-implied interaction of FX risk and a credit event. This in turn, defines the cost of hedging WWR for a FX-sensitive portfolio. Our empirical evidence shows that the implied FX jump sizes are significant for a wide range of corporates. For systemic counterparties, the CVA WWR add-on could be 40% higher than the standard case, and choosing a proper jump-at-default WWR model is critical to capture the impact. In contrast, historical correlation gives the incorrect relationship (right-way risk) and cannot calibrate to the market prices in many cases, leading to the mispricing of CVA WWR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":293888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometric Modeling: Derivatives eJournal\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometric Modeling: Derivatives eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3188793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Derivatives eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3188793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文利用信用违约互换(CDS)市场的信息,讨论了错误路径风险(WWR)模型的标定问题。Quanto CDS提供针对参考实体违约的信用保护,但以非本地货币计价。因此,Quanto CDS合约的支付反映了市场隐含的外汇风险和信用事件的相互作用。这反过来又定义了外汇敏感型投资组合的套期保值成本。我们的经验证据表明,隐含的外汇跳跃规模对广泛的公司都是显著的。对于系统交易对手,CVA的WWR附加值可能比标准情况高出40%,选择一个适当的违约跳转WWR模型对于捕捉影响至关重要。相比之下,历史相关性给出了不正确的关系(正确的风险),并且在许多情况下不能校准市场价格,导致CVA WWR的错误定价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CVA Wrong Way Risk: Calibration Using Quanto CDS Basis
In this article, we discuss the calibration of wrong way risk (WWR) model by using information from the credit default swap (CDS) market. A Quanto CDS provides credit protection against the default of a reference entity but is denominated in a non-domestic currency. The payoff of a Quanto CDS contract therefore reflects the market-implied interaction of FX risk and a credit event. This in turn, defines the cost of hedging WWR for a FX-sensitive portfolio. Our empirical evidence shows that the implied FX jump sizes are significant for a wide range of corporates. For systemic counterparties, the CVA WWR add-on could be 40% higher than the standard case, and choosing a proper jump-at-default WWR model is critical to capture the impact. In contrast, historical correlation gives the incorrect relationship (right-way risk) and cannot calibrate to the market prices in many cases, leading to the mispricing of CVA WWR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信