{"title":"自由关系","authors":"Donnel B. Stern","doi":"10.21110/19882939.2020.140201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Freedom in the interpersonal field is defined by the degree of latitude patient and analyst have to relate to one another without the kinds of constraints introduced by unconscious defensive purposes. Rigidities in the field lead to stereotyped, destructive interactions and constraints on the freedom to create the future. Changes in the field are changes in the possibilities for relatedness—i.e., changes in the kinds of relatedness that are facilitated and inhibited.","PeriodicalId":318287,"journal":{"name":"Clínica e Investigación Relacional","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Libertad relacional\",\"authors\":\"Donnel B. Stern\",\"doi\":\"10.21110/19882939.2020.140201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Freedom in the interpersonal field is defined by the degree of latitude patient and analyst have to relate to one another without the kinds of constraints introduced by unconscious defensive purposes. Rigidities in the field lead to stereotyped, destructive interactions and constraints on the freedom to create the future. Changes in the field are changes in the possibilities for relatedness—i.e., changes in the kinds of relatedness that are facilitated and inhibited.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clínica e Investigación Relacional\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clínica e Investigación Relacional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21110/19882939.2020.140201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clínica e Investigación Relacional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21110/19882939.2020.140201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Freedom in the interpersonal field is defined by the degree of latitude patient and analyst have to relate to one another without the kinds of constraints introduced by unconscious defensive purposes. Rigidities in the field lead to stereotyped, destructive interactions and constraints on the freedom to create the future. Changes in the field are changes in the possibilities for relatedness—i.e., changes in the kinds of relatedness that are facilitated and inhibited.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
