加纳小学学生在普通科学逻辑任务中的形式推理性质

Mk Amedeker, L. Abdul-Rahman
{"title":"加纳小学学生在普通科学逻辑任务中的形式推理性质","authors":"Mk Amedeker, L. Abdul-Rahman","doi":"10.4314/AJESMS.V3I1.38599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many Psychologists have considered early formal thinking among adolescents as signs of normal development. As it is not known for certain at what age Ghanaian Junior\nSecondary School (JSS) pupils achieve formal operational capabilities, the study seeks to\nfind out the relationship between Piagetian theory of development and the extent of\nformal thinking among adolescent pupils, especially in General Science Logic tasks. This study thus used two sets of questionnaire involving “General Knowledge Logic Tasks” and “General Science Logic Tasks” based on topics chosen from the JSS science syllabus to test the logical reasoning of pupils between ages of 13 and 15 years. A total of 60 pupils were selected randomly from four junior secondary schools and tested on the questionnaire. The sample was made up of 15 pupils (with 5 from each of JSS 1 to\nJSS 3) from each school. They were then served with the same items. The marks they\nobtained on the two examinations were used to determine the extent of their formal\nreasoning as well as their maturity. It was found, rather surprisingly, that the older\npupils did less formal reasoning than the younger ones. That is, the younger pupils in\nJSS 1 (age 13-14 years) performed better on the tests than those in JSS 2 (ages 14-15\nyears) and JSS 3 (ages 15 –16 years). It was also found that on the average all pupils\nperformed better on the General Knowledge tasks than on the General Science tasks,\nimplying that pupils\\' formal reasoning was not subject oriented. This anomaly may be\nattributed to the fact that many pupils resort to rote learning and as a result forget soon\nafterward what they had learned while their knowledge of happenings around them\nlasted longer. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences Vol. 3 2005: pp. 9-19","PeriodicalId":210929,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The nature of Formal Reasoning among Ghanaian Basic School pupils in General Science Logic Tasks\",\"authors\":\"Mk Amedeker, L. Abdul-Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/AJESMS.V3I1.38599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many Psychologists have considered early formal thinking among adolescents as signs of normal development. As it is not known for certain at what age Ghanaian Junior\\nSecondary School (JSS) pupils achieve formal operational capabilities, the study seeks to\\nfind out the relationship between Piagetian theory of development and the extent of\\nformal thinking among adolescent pupils, especially in General Science Logic tasks. This study thus used two sets of questionnaire involving “General Knowledge Logic Tasks” and “General Science Logic Tasks” based on topics chosen from the JSS science syllabus to test the logical reasoning of pupils between ages of 13 and 15 years. A total of 60 pupils were selected randomly from four junior secondary schools and tested on the questionnaire. The sample was made up of 15 pupils (with 5 from each of JSS 1 to\\nJSS 3) from each school. They were then served with the same items. The marks they\\nobtained on the two examinations were used to determine the extent of their formal\\nreasoning as well as their maturity. It was found, rather surprisingly, that the older\\npupils did less formal reasoning than the younger ones. That is, the younger pupils in\\nJSS 1 (age 13-14 years) performed better on the tests than those in JSS 2 (ages 14-15\\nyears) and JSS 3 (ages 15 –16 years). It was also found that on the average all pupils\\nperformed better on the General Knowledge tasks than on the General Science tasks,\\nimplying that pupils\\\\' formal reasoning was not subject oriented. This anomaly may be\\nattributed to the fact that many pupils resort to rote learning and as a result forget soon\\nafterward what they had learned while their knowledge of happenings around them\\nlasted longer. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences Vol. 3 2005: pp. 9-19\",\"PeriodicalId\":210929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/AJESMS.V3I1.38599\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/AJESMS.V3I1.38599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多心理学家认为青少年早期的形式思维是正常发展的标志。由于尚不清楚加纳初中(JSS)学生在什么年龄达到形式运算能力,本研究旨在找出皮亚杰发展理论与青少年学生形式思维程度之间的关系,特别是在一般科学逻辑任务中。因此,本研究根据JSS科学教学大纲的选题,采用“常识逻辑任务”和“科学逻辑任务”两套问卷对13 - 15岁小学生的逻辑推理能力进行测试。从四所初中随机抽取60名学生进行问卷调查。样本由每所学校的15名学生组成(其中5名来自jss1至jss3)。然后给他们提供同样的食物。他们在两次考试中获得的分数被用来确定他们的形式推理程度和成熟度。令人惊讶的是,年龄较大的学生比年龄较小的学生更不擅长形式推理。也就是说,1年级(13-14岁)的低年级学生比2年级(14-15岁)和3年级(15 -16岁)的学生在测试中表现得更好。研究还发现,平均而言,所有学生在普通知识任务中的表现都比在普通科学任务中的表现要好,这意味着学生的形式推理不是以学科为导向的。这种反常现象可能是由于许多学生采用死记硬背的学习方式,结果很快就忘记了他们所学的知识,而他们对周围发生的事情的了解却持续得更久。非洲数学与科学教育研究杂志Vol. 3 2005: pp. 9-19
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The nature of Formal Reasoning among Ghanaian Basic School pupils in General Science Logic Tasks
Many Psychologists have considered early formal thinking among adolescents as signs of normal development. As it is not known for certain at what age Ghanaian Junior Secondary School (JSS) pupils achieve formal operational capabilities, the study seeks to find out the relationship between Piagetian theory of development and the extent of formal thinking among adolescent pupils, especially in General Science Logic tasks. This study thus used two sets of questionnaire involving “General Knowledge Logic Tasks” and “General Science Logic Tasks” based on topics chosen from the JSS science syllabus to test the logical reasoning of pupils between ages of 13 and 15 years. A total of 60 pupils were selected randomly from four junior secondary schools and tested on the questionnaire. The sample was made up of 15 pupils (with 5 from each of JSS 1 to JSS 3) from each school. They were then served with the same items. The marks they obtained on the two examinations were used to determine the extent of their formal reasoning as well as their maturity. It was found, rather surprisingly, that the older pupils did less formal reasoning than the younger ones. That is, the younger pupils in JSS 1 (age 13-14 years) performed better on the tests than those in JSS 2 (ages 14-15 years) and JSS 3 (ages 15 –16 years). It was also found that on the average all pupils performed better on the General Knowledge tasks than on the General Science tasks, implying that pupils\' formal reasoning was not subject oriented. This anomaly may be attributed to the fact that many pupils resort to rote learning and as a result forget soon afterward what they had learned while their knowledge of happenings around them lasted longer. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences Vol. 3 2005: pp. 9-19
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信