{"title":"萨拉菲主义的城堡","authors":"J. Wagemakers","doi":"10.1163/9789004435544_019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Salafism [...] is a danger to Muslims themselves and thus a danger to France as well.” This is how former French Prime Minister Manuel Valls referred to Salafism in late July 2016. A certain level of hyperbole in talking about Islam was perhaps to be expected a few weeks after the French city of Nice had been the target of a terrorist attack by what appeared to be a radical Islamist, killing over eighty people. Yet it was significant that Valls apparently felt the need to single out Salafism, which he blamed for having “destroyed and perverted part of the Muslim world,” despite the fact that the perpetrator of the Nice attacks did not appear to be a Salafi at all (AFP 2016). A French Member of Parliament, Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet, even went so far as to call for a ban on Salafism altogether (Lefeivre 2016). Such criticism of Salafism as being dangerous and even calls for banning this trend altogether are not limited to France. A similar call was heard in the Netherlands, for instance, from Ahmed Marcouch, a former Member of Parliament for the Dutch Labour Party, who considers Salafism a “breeding ground of jihadism and the ideological cradle of [the Islamic State (IS)]” (Marcouch and El Bouch 2015). In Kazakhstan, to mention one more example, a Muslim-majority country with an officially secular regime, President Nursultan Nazarbaev indicated in October 2016 that his country intended to ban Salafism, which he said, “poses a destructive threat to Kazakhstan” (Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty 2016). Salafism, in other words, is controversial. Ironically, this is also the case among Salafis themselves. Issues such as who may be labelled a Salafi and what types of Salafism exist are highly contested among adherents to this branch of Sunnī Islam themselves, which—as we will see later on in this chapter— indicates that Salafis are far less unified than the politicians quoted above appear to believe. This chapter will shed light on such contestations by dealing with the definition, history and ideological development of Salafism, the means adherents to this trend use to defend their doctrinal turf, its spreading throughout the Muslim world, Salafis’ everyday practices, and the faultlines that exist within the trend.","PeriodicalId":410071,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of Islamic Sects and Movements","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Citadel of Salafism\",\"authors\":\"J. Wagemakers\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004435544_019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“Salafism [...] is a danger to Muslims themselves and thus a danger to France as well.” This is how former French Prime Minister Manuel Valls referred to Salafism in late July 2016. A certain level of hyperbole in talking about Islam was perhaps to be expected a few weeks after the French city of Nice had been the target of a terrorist attack by what appeared to be a radical Islamist, killing over eighty people. Yet it was significant that Valls apparently felt the need to single out Salafism, which he blamed for having “destroyed and perverted part of the Muslim world,” despite the fact that the perpetrator of the Nice attacks did not appear to be a Salafi at all (AFP 2016). A French Member of Parliament, Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet, even went so far as to call for a ban on Salafism altogether (Lefeivre 2016). Such criticism of Salafism as being dangerous and even calls for banning this trend altogether are not limited to France. A similar call was heard in the Netherlands, for instance, from Ahmed Marcouch, a former Member of Parliament for the Dutch Labour Party, who considers Salafism a “breeding ground of jihadism and the ideological cradle of [the Islamic State (IS)]” (Marcouch and El Bouch 2015). In Kazakhstan, to mention one more example, a Muslim-majority country with an officially secular regime, President Nursultan Nazarbaev indicated in October 2016 that his country intended to ban Salafism, which he said, “poses a destructive threat to Kazakhstan” (Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty 2016). Salafism, in other words, is controversial. Ironically, this is also the case among Salafis themselves. Issues such as who may be labelled a Salafi and what types of Salafism exist are highly contested among adherents to this branch of Sunnī Islam themselves, which—as we will see later on in this chapter— indicates that Salafis are far less unified than the politicians quoted above appear to believe. This chapter will shed light on such contestations by dealing with the definition, history and ideological development of Salafism, the means adherents to this trend use to defend their doctrinal turf, its spreading throughout the Muslim world, Salafis’ everyday practices, and the faultlines that exist within the trend.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Handbook of Islamic Sects and Movements\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Handbook of Islamic Sects and Movements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004435544_019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of Islamic Sects and Movements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004435544_019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
“萨拉菲主义[…对穆斯林本身是危险的,因此对法国也是危险的。”在法国尼斯市遭受疑似激进伊斯兰分子的恐怖袭击,造成80多人死亡几周后,在谈论伊斯兰教时出现某种程度的夸张或许是意料之中的。然而,值得注意的是,瓦尔斯显然觉得有必要把萨拉菲主义单独挑出来,他指责萨拉菲主义“摧毁和扭曲了一部分穆斯林世界”,尽管尼斯袭击的肇事者似乎根本不是萨拉菲派(法新社2016)。法国国会议员Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet甚至呼吁完全禁止萨拉菲主义(Lefeivre 2016)。这种批评萨拉菲主义是危险的,甚至呼吁完全禁止这种趋势的言论并不仅限于法国。例如,荷兰前工党议员艾哈迈德·马尔库奇(Ahmed Marcouch)也发出了类似的呼吁,他认为萨拉菲主义是“圣战主义的滋生地,是伊斯兰国(IS)的意识形态摇篮”(Marcouch and El Bouch 2015)。再举一个例子,在穆斯林占多数的官方世俗政权的哈萨克斯坦,总统努尔苏丹·纳扎尔巴耶夫(Nursultan Nazarbaev)于2016年10月表示,他的国家打算禁止萨拉菲主义,他说,萨拉菲主义“对哈萨克斯坦构成了破坏性威胁”(自由欧洲电台/自由电台2016)。换句话说,萨拉菲主义是有争议的。讽刺的是,萨拉菲派本身也是如此。诸如谁可以被贴上萨拉菲派的标签以及萨拉菲主义存在的类型等问题在逊尼派伊斯兰教分支的追随者之间存在着激烈的争论,正如我们将在本章后面看到的那样,这表明萨拉菲派远没有上面引用的政治家所相信的那样统一。本章将通过处理萨拉菲主义的定义、历史和意识形态的发展,这一趋势的追随者用来捍卫他们的教义领地的手段,它在整个穆斯林世界的传播,萨拉菲派的日常实践,以及这一趋势中存在的断层线来阐明这些争论。
“Salafism [...] is a danger to Muslims themselves and thus a danger to France as well.” This is how former French Prime Minister Manuel Valls referred to Salafism in late July 2016. A certain level of hyperbole in talking about Islam was perhaps to be expected a few weeks after the French city of Nice had been the target of a terrorist attack by what appeared to be a radical Islamist, killing over eighty people. Yet it was significant that Valls apparently felt the need to single out Salafism, which he blamed for having “destroyed and perverted part of the Muslim world,” despite the fact that the perpetrator of the Nice attacks did not appear to be a Salafi at all (AFP 2016). A French Member of Parliament, Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet, even went so far as to call for a ban on Salafism altogether (Lefeivre 2016). Such criticism of Salafism as being dangerous and even calls for banning this trend altogether are not limited to France. A similar call was heard in the Netherlands, for instance, from Ahmed Marcouch, a former Member of Parliament for the Dutch Labour Party, who considers Salafism a “breeding ground of jihadism and the ideological cradle of [the Islamic State (IS)]” (Marcouch and El Bouch 2015). In Kazakhstan, to mention one more example, a Muslim-majority country with an officially secular regime, President Nursultan Nazarbaev indicated in October 2016 that his country intended to ban Salafism, which he said, “poses a destructive threat to Kazakhstan” (Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty 2016). Salafism, in other words, is controversial. Ironically, this is also the case among Salafis themselves. Issues such as who may be labelled a Salafi and what types of Salafism exist are highly contested among adherents to this branch of Sunnī Islam themselves, which—as we will see later on in this chapter— indicates that Salafis are far less unified than the politicians quoted above appear to believe. This chapter will shed light on such contestations by dealing with the definition, history and ideological development of Salafism, the means adherents to this trend use to defend their doctrinal turf, its spreading throughout the Muslim world, Salafis’ everyday practices, and the faultlines that exist within the trend.