帕纳西的分歧

J. Harvey
{"title":"帕纳西的分歧","authors":"J. Harvey","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474423786.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following discussion of the particularities of the Panahi case and the cultural specificity of the film, I engage with This is Not a Film in the context of what Rancière describes as ‘suitable political art’ (2004: 63), making the case that Panahi’s non-film – his, as he describes it, “effort” – constitutes a form of political subjectification. I explore what I refer to as an ‘aesthetic of effort’, tracing the lineage of domesticity, self-reflexivity and the long-take in relation to discourses of political filmmaking.","PeriodicalId":126074,"journal":{"name":"Jacques Rancière and the Politics of Art Cinema","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Panahi’s Disagreement\",\"authors\":\"J. Harvey\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474423786.003.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following discussion of the particularities of the Panahi case and the cultural specificity of the film, I engage with This is Not a Film in the context of what Rancière describes as ‘suitable political art’ (2004: 63), making the case that Panahi’s non-film – his, as he describes it, “effort” – constitutes a form of political subjectification. I explore what I refer to as an ‘aesthetic of effort’, tracing the lineage of domesticity, self-reflexivity and the long-take in relation to discourses of political filmmaking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jacques Rancière and the Politics of Art Cinema\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jacques Rancière and the Politics of Art Cinema\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474423786.003.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jacques Rancière and the Politics of Art Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474423786.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在讨论了帕纳西案例的特殊性和这部电影的文化特殊性之后,我将《这不是一部电影》置于ranci所说的“合适的政治艺术”(2004:63)的背景下,提出帕纳西的非电影——如他所说的,他的“努力”——构成了一种政治主体化的形式。我探索我所谓的“努力美学”,追踪家庭生活的血统,自我反思和与政治电影制作话语相关的长期拍摄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Panahi’s Disagreement
Following discussion of the particularities of the Panahi case and the cultural specificity of the film, I engage with This is Not a Film in the context of what Rancière describes as ‘suitable political art’ (2004: 63), making the case that Panahi’s non-film – his, as he describes it, “effort” – constitutes a form of political subjectification. I explore what I refer to as an ‘aesthetic of effort’, tracing the lineage of domesticity, self-reflexivity and the long-take in relation to discourses of political filmmaking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信