Alex Titlow, Matt K. Luebbe, Drew J. Lyon, Terry J. Klopfenstein, Karla Jenkins
{"title":"使用旱地一年生混合饲料作为放牧肉牛的饲料选择","authors":"Alex Titlow, Matt K. Luebbe, Drew J. Lyon, Terry J. Klopfenstein, Karla Jenkins","doi":"10.2134/FG-2013-0041-RS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cover crops are becoming increasingly popular in place of fallow in many farming regions. In semiarid, high plains regions, being able to utilize these annual forages for beef cattle can be crucial to maintaining beef cattle herds. The objective of this experiment was to evaluate annual forage mixtures for dry matter production and diet quality for beef cattle in a dryland no-till crop production system. In a two-year experiment, spring-planted forage pea (<i>Pisum sativum</i>), oat (<i>Avena sativa</i>), and turnip (<i>Brassica rapa</i>) were compared to crested wheatgrass pasture (<i>Agropyron cristatum</i>) for grazing cattle. Overall, annual forage mixtures had greater forage digestibility than crested wheatgrass (66.1 vs. 51.6%) and greater crude protein (10.0 vs. 6.9%, respectively). Dry matter production was greater for the crested wheatgrass pasture in 2011 than for the annual forage mixture (0.97 vs. 0.55 ton/acre). However, in 2012 the dry matter production was similar for annual forage mixtures and crested wheatgrass pasture (0.74 vs. 0.76 ton/acre, respectively). This integration of crops and livestock may offer an economical approach to using land for both grain and cattle production, while providing some deferment of perennial grass pastures when needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":100549,"journal":{"name":"Forage & Grazinglands","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2134/FG-2013-0041-RS","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Dryland Annual Forage Mixtures as a Forage Option for Grazing Beef Cattle\",\"authors\":\"Alex Titlow, Matt K. Luebbe, Drew J. Lyon, Terry J. Klopfenstein, Karla Jenkins\",\"doi\":\"10.2134/FG-2013-0041-RS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cover crops are becoming increasingly popular in place of fallow in many farming regions. In semiarid, high plains regions, being able to utilize these annual forages for beef cattle can be crucial to maintaining beef cattle herds. The objective of this experiment was to evaluate annual forage mixtures for dry matter production and diet quality for beef cattle in a dryland no-till crop production system. In a two-year experiment, spring-planted forage pea (<i>Pisum sativum</i>), oat (<i>Avena sativa</i>), and turnip (<i>Brassica rapa</i>) were compared to crested wheatgrass pasture (<i>Agropyron cristatum</i>) for grazing cattle. Overall, annual forage mixtures had greater forage digestibility than crested wheatgrass (66.1 vs. 51.6%) and greater crude protein (10.0 vs. 6.9%, respectively). Dry matter production was greater for the crested wheatgrass pasture in 2011 than for the annual forage mixture (0.97 vs. 0.55 ton/acre). However, in 2012 the dry matter production was similar for annual forage mixtures and crested wheatgrass pasture (0.74 vs. 0.76 ton/acre, respectively). This integration of crops and livestock may offer an economical approach to using land for both grain and cattle production, while providing some deferment of perennial grass pastures when needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forage & Grazinglands\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2134/FG-2013-0041-RS\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forage & Grazinglands\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2134/FG-2013-0041-RS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forage & Grazinglands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2134/FG-2013-0041-RS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
在许多农业地区,覆盖作物取代休耕越来越受欢迎。在半干旱的高平原地区,能够利用这些年度牧草饲养肉牛对维持肉牛群至关重要。本试验旨在评价旱地免耕作物生产体系下一年生混合饲料对肉牛干物质生产和日粮品质的影响。在一项为期两年的试验中,将春栽牧草豌豆(Pisum sativum)、燕麦(Avena sativa)和芜菁(Brassica rapa)与冠状小麦草牧草(Agropyron cristatum)进行了比较。总体而言,一年生混合饲料的饲料消化率(66.1比51.6%)和粗蛋白质(10.0比6.9%)均高于冠茅。2011年,冠麦草甸的干物质产量高于一年生混合饲料(0.97 vs 0.55吨/英亩)。然而,在2012年,一年生混合饲料和冠麦草甸的干物质产量相似(分别为0.74和0.76吨/英亩)。这种作物和牲畜的结合可以提供一种经济的方法,利用土地生产粮食和牲畜,同时在需要时提供一些多年生牧草的延期。
Using Dryland Annual Forage Mixtures as a Forage Option for Grazing Beef Cattle
Cover crops are becoming increasingly popular in place of fallow in many farming regions. In semiarid, high plains regions, being able to utilize these annual forages for beef cattle can be crucial to maintaining beef cattle herds. The objective of this experiment was to evaluate annual forage mixtures for dry matter production and diet quality for beef cattle in a dryland no-till crop production system. In a two-year experiment, spring-planted forage pea (Pisum sativum), oat (Avena sativa), and turnip (Brassica rapa) were compared to crested wheatgrass pasture (Agropyron cristatum) for grazing cattle. Overall, annual forage mixtures had greater forage digestibility than crested wheatgrass (66.1 vs. 51.6%) and greater crude protein (10.0 vs. 6.9%, respectively). Dry matter production was greater for the crested wheatgrass pasture in 2011 than for the annual forage mixture (0.97 vs. 0.55 ton/acre). However, in 2012 the dry matter production was similar for annual forage mixtures and crested wheatgrass pasture (0.74 vs. 0.76 ton/acre, respectively). This integration of crops and livestock may offer an economical approach to using land for both grain and cattle production, while providing some deferment of perennial grass pastures when needed.