{"title":"完整顺序行为的功能验证:对系统级和RTL描述之间差异的正式处理","authors":"Carlos Ivan Castro Marquez, M. Strum, J. Wang","doi":"10.1109/IDT.2013.6727074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Formal techniques allow exhaustive verification on circuit design (at least in theory), but due to actual computational limitations, workarounds must always be adopted to check only a portion of the design at a time. Sequential equivalence checking is an effective approach, but it can only be applied between circuit descriptions where a one-to-one correspondence for states, as well as for memory elements, is expected. This paper presents a formal methodology to verify RTL descriptions through direct comparison with high-level reference models. By doing so, there is no need to specify or analyze formal properties, as the complete behavior is already contained in the reference model. We also consider the natural discrepancies between system level and RTL code, including non-matching interface and memory elements, and state mapping. In this manner, we are able to prove the functional coherence for the overall sequential behavior of the design under verification.","PeriodicalId":446826,"journal":{"name":"2013 8th IEEE Design and Test Symposium","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional verification of complete sequential behaviors: A formal treatment of discrepancies between system-level and RTL descriptions\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Ivan Castro Marquez, M. Strum, J. Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IDT.2013.6727074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Formal techniques allow exhaustive verification on circuit design (at least in theory), but due to actual computational limitations, workarounds must always be adopted to check only a portion of the design at a time. Sequential equivalence checking is an effective approach, but it can only be applied between circuit descriptions where a one-to-one correspondence for states, as well as for memory elements, is expected. This paper presents a formal methodology to verify RTL descriptions through direct comparison with high-level reference models. By doing so, there is no need to specify or analyze formal properties, as the complete behavior is already contained in the reference model. We also consider the natural discrepancies between system level and RTL code, including non-matching interface and memory elements, and state mapping. In this manner, we are able to prove the functional coherence for the overall sequential behavior of the design under verification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":446826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 8th IEEE Design and Test Symposium\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 8th IEEE Design and Test Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IDT.2013.6727074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 8th IEEE Design and Test Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IDT.2013.6727074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Functional verification of complete sequential behaviors: A formal treatment of discrepancies between system-level and RTL descriptions
Formal techniques allow exhaustive verification on circuit design (at least in theory), but due to actual computational limitations, workarounds must always be adopted to check only a portion of the design at a time. Sequential equivalence checking is an effective approach, but it can only be applied between circuit descriptions where a one-to-one correspondence for states, as well as for memory elements, is expected. This paper presents a formal methodology to verify RTL descriptions through direct comparison with high-level reference models. By doing so, there is no need to specify or analyze formal properties, as the complete behavior is already contained in the reference model. We also consider the natural discrepancies between system level and RTL code, including non-matching interface and memory elements, and state mapping. In this manner, we are able to prove the functional coherence for the overall sequential behavior of the design under verification.