{"title":"正义与道德","authors":"Philip S. Holt, A. Basden","doi":"10.1300/J460v02n02_05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract “Unauthorized network intrusions affect us all. Worse yet, certain classes of unauthorized network intrusions are a very serious matter; ones in which there are minimal defensive actions to prevent such attacks.” Denial-Of-Service (DoS) and Distributed Denial-Of-Service (DDoS) attacks are the class of attack vectors this paper examines and demystifies. We will examine certain aspects (multi/polyaspectuality) of these class-attacks by investigating the following: • The online statement from Carnegie Mellon's Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT/CC Timeline, May 2001). The interplay of three types of justice: Legal Justice (Jus Ad Rem), Social Justice (Jus Civile), and Natural-Moral Justice, or Ethics (Jus Naturalis), while asking the reasonable question, “Can these three types of justice co-exist?” The application of Lonergan's ethics, whose employment allows for the examination of the good, obligation, and value. • In doing so, we hope to arrive at some preliminary answers that will (1) serve as a concrete foundation that will verify the authenticity of positions and further develop those positions; and (2) serve to undermine and destroy weak positions, the ones which are in fact counterpositions and reverse them to concrete positions that are attentive, intelligent, reasonable, and responsible to the individual, the group that said person is a member of, and the society in which they are situated.","PeriodicalId":345897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Security Education","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Justice and Ethics\",\"authors\":\"Philip S. Holt, A. Basden\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J460v02n02_05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract “Unauthorized network intrusions affect us all. Worse yet, certain classes of unauthorized network intrusions are a very serious matter; ones in which there are minimal defensive actions to prevent such attacks.” Denial-Of-Service (DoS) and Distributed Denial-Of-Service (DDoS) attacks are the class of attack vectors this paper examines and demystifies. We will examine certain aspects (multi/polyaspectuality) of these class-attacks by investigating the following: • The online statement from Carnegie Mellon's Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT/CC Timeline, May 2001). The interplay of three types of justice: Legal Justice (Jus Ad Rem), Social Justice (Jus Civile), and Natural-Moral Justice, or Ethics (Jus Naturalis), while asking the reasonable question, “Can these three types of justice co-exist?” The application of Lonergan's ethics, whose employment allows for the examination of the good, obligation, and value. • In doing so, we hope to arrive at some preliminary answers that will (1) serve as a concrete foundation that will verify the authenticity of positions and further develop those positions; and (2) serve to undermine and destroy weak positions, the ones which are in fact counterpositions and reverse them to concrete positions that are attentive, intelligent, reasonable, and responsible to the individual, the group that said person is a member of, and the society in which they are situated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Security Education\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Security Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J460v02n02_05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Security Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J460v02n02_05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
“未经授权的网络入侵影响着我们所有人。更糟糕的是,某些类别的未经授权的网络入侵是一个非常严重的问题;在这种情况下,防止此类袭击的防御行动最少。”拒绝服务(DoS)和分布式拒绝服务(DDoS)攻击是本文研究和揭示的一类攻击向量。我们将通过调查以下内容来检查这些类攻击的某些方面(多/多方面):•卡内基梅隆大学计算机应急响应小组(CERT/CC Timeline, 2001年5月)的在线声明。三种类型的正义:法律正义(Jus Ad Rem),社会正义(Jus Civile)和自然道德正义或伦理学(Jus Naturalis)的相互作用,同时提出合理的问题,“这三种类型的正义可以共存吗?”朗尼根伦理学的应用,其应用允许对善、义务和价值进行检验。•在这样做的过程中,我们希望得到一些初步的答案,这些答案将(1)作为验证立场真实性的具体基础,并进一步发展这些立场;(2)有助于破坏和摧毁弱势地位,即那些实际上是对立的地位,并将其逆转为具体的地位,这种地位是对个人,对个人所属的群体,对他们所处的社会负责的,明智的,合理的和负责的。
Abstract “Unauthorized network intrusions affect us all. Worse yet, certain classes of unauthorized network intrusions are a very serious matter; ones in which there are minimal defensive actions to prevent such attacks.” Denial-Of-Service (DoS) and Distributed Denial-Of-Service (DDoS) attacks are the class of attack vectors this paper examines and demystifies. We will examine certain aspects (multi/polyaspectuality) of these class-attacks by investigating the following: • The online statement from Carnegie Mellon's Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT/CC Timeline, May 2001). The interplay of three types of justice: Legal Justice (Jus Ad Rem), Social Justice (Jus Civile), and Natural-Moral Justice, or Ethics (Jus Naturalis), while asking the reasonable question, “Can these three types of justice co-exist?” The application of Lonergan's ethics, whose employment allows for the examination of the good, obligation, and value. • In doing so, we hope to arrive at some preliminary answers that will (1) serve as a concrete foundation that will verify the authenticity of positions and further develop those positions; and (2) serve to undermine and destroy weak positions, the ones which are in fact counterpositions and reverse them to concrete positions that are attentive, intelligent, reasonable, and responsible to the individual, the group that said person is a member of, and the society in which they are situated.