媒体使用对情绪社会分享的理解机制:媒介可视性和习惯性媒体使用的作用

Mina Choi, Catalina L. Toma
{"title":"媒体使用对情绪社会分享的理解机制:媒介可视性和习惯性媒体使用的作用","authors":"Mina Choi, Catalina L. Toma","doi":"10.1027/1864-1105/a000301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The social sharing of emotion is the process of communicating with others about one’s significant emotional experiences. Recent research has shown that interpersonal media such as texting, voice calling, and social network site posts are widely used for social sharing, yet it has not investigated how and why people use these media. This article takes on the task of investigating the mechanism responsible for media selection for the first instance of social sharing. A survey of undergraduates ( N = 227) shows that respondents’ media use for sharing positive and negative events was driven by their perceptions of media affordances and by their habitual media use with the target of their disclosure. For positive events, respondents articulated preferences for accessibility, while for negative events, they preferred bandwidth and privacy affordances. Habitual media use was the strongest predictor of media use for social sharing, but the perceived importance of these affordances predicted media use above and beyond media habits. These findings extend the social-sharing framework and the literature on media selection in social contexts.","PeriodicalId":366104,"journal":{"name":"J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl.","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Mechanisms of Media Use for the Social Sharing of Emotion: The Role of Media Affordances and Habitual Media Use\",\"authors\":\"Mina Choi, Catalina L. Toma\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/1864-1105/a000301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The social sharing of emotion is the process of communicating with others about one’s significant emotional experiences. Recent research has shown that interpersonal media such as texting, voice calling, and social network site posts are widely used for social sharing, yet it has not investigated how and why people use these media. This article takes on the task of investigating the mechanism responsible for media selection for the first instance of social sharing. A survey of undergraduates ( N = 227) shows that respondents’ media use for sharing positive and negative events was driven by their perceptions of media affordances and by their habitual media use with the target of their disclosure. For positive events, respondents articulated preferences for accessibility, while for negative events, they preferred bandwidth and privacy affordances. Habitual media use was the strongest predictor of media use for social sharing, but the perceived importance of these affordances predicted media use above and beyond media habits. These findings extend the social-sharing framework and the literature on media selection in social contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":366104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl.\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要情感的社会分享是与他人交流自己重要的情感经历的过程。最近的研究表明,诸如短信、语音通话和社交网站帖子等人际媒体被广泛用于社交分享,但尚未调查人们如何以及为什么使用这些媒体。本文对社会分享的媒介选择机制进行了初步研究。一项针对大学生(N = 227)的调查显示,受访者在分享积极和消极事件时使用的媒体是由他们对媒体启示的感知和他们习惯性地使用媒体来披露目标所驱动的。对于积极事件,受访者表达了对可访问性的偏好,而对于消极事件,他们更喜欢带宽和隐私能力。习惯性媒体使用是社交分享媒体使用的最强预测因子,但这些功能的感知重要性预测媒体使用超越媒体习惯。这些发现扩展了社会分享框架和社会背景下媒体选择的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding Mechanisms of Media Use for the Social Sharing of Emotion: The Role of Media Affordances and Habitual Media Use
Abstract. The social sharing of emotion is the process of communicating with others about one’s significant emotional experiences. Recent research has shown that interpersonal media such as texting, voice calling, and social network site posts are widely used for social sharing, yet it has not investigated how and why people use these media. This article takes on the task of investigating the mechanism responsible for media selection for the first instance of social sharing. A survey of undergraduates ( N = 227) shows that respondents’ media use for sharing positive and negative events was driven by their perceptions of media affordances and by their habitual media use with the target of their disclosure. For positive events, respondents articulated preferences for accessibility, while for negative events, they preferred bandwidth and privacy affordances. Habitual media use was the strongest predictor of media use for social sharing, but the perceived importance of these affordances predicted media use above and beyond media habits. These findings extend the social-sharing framework and the literature on media selection in social contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信