关于排版,技术写作专业的学生应该知道什么

J. Mackiewicz
{"title":"关于排版,技术写作专业的学生应该知道什么","authors":"J. Mackiewicz","doi":"10.1109/IPCC.2003.1245492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines technical writing students' ratings of five typefaces' on five tone attributes like \"professional\" and \"technical\" It also examines students' written assessments of typefaces, investigating why students perceive typefaces to convey different attributes and how students relate different typefaces to different types of documents. Two main findings emerged from this analysis of both quantitative, semantic differential data and qualitative, written responses: 1) Students lack the vocabulary to make fine distinctions among text typefaces; and 2) Students sometimes make associations among attributes that experts would not agree with. Four guidelines, generated by analysis of students' responses, are discussed: 1) Choose a typeface with relatively large, open counters and large x-heights for legibility and readability; 2) Choose a typeface with no or moderate modeling for professionalism; 3) Choose a typeface with variable pitch (as opposed to a fixed pitch) - to avoid an excessively technical tone; and 4) Avoid typefaces that mimic other modes of writing to avoid distracting readers from the message.","PeriodicalId":439913,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 2003. IPCC 2003. Proceedings.","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What technical writing students do know and should know about typography\",\"authors\":\"J. Mackiewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPCC.2003.1245492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines technical writing students' ratings of five typefaces' on five tone attributes like \\\"professional\\\" and \\\"technical\\\" It also examines students' written assessments of typefaces, investigating why students perceive typefaces to convey different attributes and how students relate different typefaces to different types of documents. Two main findings emerged from this analysis of both quantitative, semantic differential data and qualitative, written responses: 1) Students lack the vocabulary to make fine distinctions among text typefaces; and 2) Students sometimes make associations among attributes that experts would not agree with. Four guidelines, generated by analysis of students' responses, are discussed: 1) Choose a typeface with relatively large, open counters and large x-heights for legibility and readability; 2) Choose a typeface with no or moderate modeling for professionalism; 3) Choose a typeface with variable pitch (as opposed to a fixed pitch) - to avoid an excessively technical tone; and 4) Avoid typefaces that mimic other modes of writing to avoid distracting readers from the message.\",\"PeriodicalId\":439913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 2003. IPCC 2003. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 2003. IPCC 2003. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2003.1245492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 2003. IPCC 2003. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2003.1245492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文考察了技术写作学生对五种字体在“专业”和“技术”等五种色调属性上的评分。它还考察了学生对字体的书面评估,调查了为什么学生认为字体传达了不同的属性,以及学生如何将不同的字体与不同类型的文档联系起来。通过对定量、语义差异数据和定性、书面反馈的分析,我们发现了两个主要发现:1)学生缺乏区分文本字体的词汇量;2)学生有时会把专家不同意的属性联系起来。通过对学生反应的分析,本文讨论了四个准则:1)选择一个相对较大的、开放的、x高较大的字体,以提高易读性和可读性;2)选择没有或适度建模的字体,以提高专业度;3)选择一个可变音高的字体(而不是固定音高),以避免过于技术性的语气;4)避免模仿其他写作模式的字体,以免分散读者的注意力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What technical writing students do know and should know about typography
This paper examines technical writing students' ratings of five typefaces' on five tone attributes like "professional" and "technical" It also examines students' written assessments of typefaces, investigating why students perceive typefaces to convey different attributes and how students relate different typefaces to different types of documents. Two main findings emerged from this analysis of both quantitative, semantic differential data and qualitative, written responses: 1) Students lack the vocabulary to make fine distinctions among text typefaces; and 2) Students sometimes make associations among attributes that experts would not agree with. Four guidelines, generated by analysis of students' responses, are discussed: 1) Choose a typeface with relatively large, open counters and large x-heights for legibility and readability; 2) Choose a typeface with no or moderate modeling for professionalism; 3) Choose a typeface with variable pitch (as opposed to a fixed pitch) - to avoid an excessively technical tone; and 4) Avoid typefaces that mimic other modes of writing to avoid distracting readers from the message.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信