最优机构交易理论

C. Holden
{"title":"最优机构交易理论","authors":"C. Holden","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2470280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I develop a theory of optimal trading by an institutional trader who receives a parent order (i.e., an overall trading request) from a fund manager to buy a specific quantity of a particular stock over a specified time horizon. The trader selects child orders to be submitted each period over the allotted time horizon to a limit order book market. Child orders can be either market orders or limit orders. Limit order prices can be selected from any price on a penny price grid. An unexecuted limit order can be cancelled at any time. The trader’s objective is to minimize the disutility of the fund manager. In the base version of the theory, all child orders are of unit size. I derive an analytic solution for the optimal trading strategy and show that it involves “dynamic aggressiveness.” This means that if the current period limit order executes (doesn’t execute), then the next limit order optimally has a weakly less (weakly more) aggressive price. Next, I extend the theory to: (1) permit child orders of any size, (2) allow the fund manager to have private information about future stock prices, (3) allow the fund manager to be risk averse, and (4) allow four alternative metrics for computing execution cost. I calibrate the model to real-world data and optimize it numerically. I find that if the fund manager has a large disutility parameter for underfills, then the optimal strategy involves a sequence of limit orders early on and switches to a sequence market orders later on to guarantee purchasing the parent order. Conversely, if the fund manager has a zero disutility parameter for underfills, then the optimal strategy involves a sequence of limit orders with low price aggressiveness, such that each individual trade will earn the spread. If a fund manager is relatively informed and/or highly risk averse, then the optimal strategy is relatively front-loaded in time and switches to market orders relatively early so as to trade before price moves in the predicted direction and/or to reduce risk. Conversely, if the fund manager is uninformed and has low risk aversion, then the optimal strategy is spread out over time and switches to market orders later. I find that the optimal trading strategy frequently involves dynamic aggressiveness and frequently beats two benchmark trading strategies from the existing literature. Finally, I discuss empirical predictions of the theory and how they can be tested.","PeriodicalId":303799,"journal":{"name":"Kelley: Finance (Topic)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Theory of Optimal Institutional Trading\",\"authors\":\"C. Holden\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2470280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I develop a theory of optimal trading by an institutional trader who receives a parent order (i.e., an overall trading request) from a fund manager to buy a specific quantity of a particular stock over a specified time horizon. The trader selects child orders to be submitted each period over the allotted time horizon to a limit order book market. Child orders can be either market orders or limit orders. Limit order prices can be selected from any price on a penny price grid. An unexecuted limit order can be cancelled at any time. The trader’s objective is to minimize the disutility of the fund manager. In the base version of the theory, all child orders are of unit size. I derive an analytic solution for the optimal trading strategy and show that it involves “dynamic aggressiveness.” This means that if the current period limit order executes (doesn’t execute), then the next limit order optimally has a weakly less (weakly more) aggressive price. Next, I extend the theory to: (1) permit child orders of any size, (2) allow the fund manager to have private information about future stock prices, (3) allow the fund manager to be risk averse, and (4) allow four alternative metrics for computing execution cost. I calibrate the model to real-world data and optimize it numerically. I find that if the fund manager has a large disutility parameter for underfills, then the optimal strategy involves a sequence of limit orders early on and switches to a sequence market orders later on to guarantee purchasing the parent order. Conversely, if the fund manager has a zero disutility parameter for underfills, then the optimal strategy involves a sequence of limit orders with low price aggressiveness, such that each individual trade will earn the spread. If a fund manager is relatively informed and/or highly risk averse, then the optimal strategy is relatively front-loaded in time and switches to market orders relatively early so as to trade before price moves in the predicted direction and/or to reduce risk. Conversely, if the fund manager is uninformed and has low risk aversion, then the optimal strategy is spread out over time and switches to market orders later. I find that the optimal trading strategy frequently involves dynamic aggressiveness and frequently beats two benchmark trading strategies from the existing literature. Finally, I discuss empirical predictions of the theory and how they can be tested.\",\"PeriodicalId\":303799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kelley: Finance (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kelley: Finance (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2470280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kelley: Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2470280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我发展了一个机构交易者的最优交易理论,他从基金经理那里收到一个母订单(即一个整体交易请求),要求在指定的时间范围内购买特定数量的特定股票。交易者选择子订单在分配的时间范围内提交给限价订单市场。子订单可以是市价订单或限价订单。限价订单价格可以从便士价格网格上的任何价格中选择。未执行的限价订单可随时取消。交易者的目标是使基金经理的负效用最小化。在该理论的基本版本中,所有子订单都是单位大小的。我导出了最优交易策略的解析解,并表明它涉及“动态进取性”。这意味着如果当前限价单执行(未执行),那么下一个限价单的最优价格较弱(较弱)激进。接下来,我将理论扩展到:(1)允许任何规模的子订单,(2)允许基金经理拥有有关未来股票价格的私人信息,(3)允许基金经理规避风险,以及(4)允许计算执行成本的四个替代指标。我根据实际数据校准模型,并对其进行数值优化。我发现,如果基金经理对欠填量有较大的负效用参数,那么最优策略涉及早期的一系列限价订单,然后切换到序列市场订单,以保证购买母订单。相反,如果基金经理的负效用参数为零,则最优策略包括一系列具有低价格侵略性的限价单,这样每笔交易都将赚取差价。如果一个基金经理是相对消息灵通和/或高度风险厌恶者,那么最优策略是相对及时地提前加载,并相对早地切换到市场订单,以便在价格向预期方向移动之前进行交易和/或降低风险。相反,如果基金经理不知情且风险厌恶程度低,那么最优策略会随着时间的推移而分散,并在之后转向市场订单。我发现最优交易策略经常涉及动态进取性,并且经常优于现有文献中的两个基准交易策略。最后,我讨论了该理论的经验预测以及如何对其进行测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Theory of Optimal Institutional Trading
I develop a theory of optimal trading by an institutional trader who receives a parent order (i.e., an overall trading request) from a fund manager to buy a specific quantity of a particular stock over a specified time horizon. The trader selects child orders to be submitted each period over the allotted time horizon to a limit order book market. Child orders can be either market orders or limit orders. Limit order prices can be selected from any price on a penny price grid. An unexecuted limit order can be cancelled at any time. The trader’s objective is to minimize the disutility of the fund manager. In the base version of the theory, all child orders are of unit size. I derive an analytic solution for the optimal trading strategy and show that it involves “dynamic aggressiveness.” This means that if the current period limit order executes (doesn’t execute), then the next limit order optimally has a weakly less (weakly more) aggressive price. Next, I extend the theory to: (1) permit child orders of any size, (2) allow the fund manager to have private information about future stock prices, (3) allow the fund manager to be risk averse, and (4) allow four alternative metrics for computing execution cost. I calibrate the model to real-world data and optimize it numerically. I find that if the fund manager has a large disutility parameter for underfills, then the optimal strategy involves a sequence of limit orders early on and switches to a sequence market orders later on to guarantee purchasing the parent order. Conversely, if the fund manager has a zero disutility parameter for underfills, then the optimal strategy involves a sequence of limit orders with low price aggressiveness, such that each individual trade will earn the spread. If a fund manager is relatively informed and/or highly risk averse, then the optimal strategy is relatively front-loaded in time and switches to market orders relatively early so as to trade before price moves in the predicted direction and/or to reduce risk. Conversely, if the fund manager is uninformed and has low risk aversion, then the optimal strategy is spread out over time and switches to market orders later. I find that the optimal trading strategy frequently involves dynamic aggressiveness and frequently beats two benchmark trading strategies from the existing literature. Finally, I discuss empirical predictions of the theory and how they can be tested.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信